Kevin Horton wrote:
On 29 Oct 2007, at 21:27, Robert T Wyatt wrote:
Building cadabra kind of dies because it doesn't find breqn (which is
installed):
checking for latex... yes
-n checking for breqn package...
The -n raises a certain suspicion...
^Z
[1]+ Stopped fink
I can't fink install gnutls-bin. Does this mean that there are some issues
installing it on leopard? I tired installing it manually, but got some errors
when `make'.
Without this package, i'm unable to send mail by gmail in Gnus... Any ideas?
--
William
On Tue, 30 Oct 2007 09:26:56 +0100
Martin Costabel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 29 Oct 2007, at 21:27, Robert T Wyatt wrote:
Building cadabra kind of dies because it doesn't find breqn (which is
installed):
checking for latex... yes
-n checking for breqn package...
Several
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
William Xu wrote:
I can't fink install gnutls-bin. Does this mean that there are some issues
installing it on leopard? I tired installing it manually, but got some
errors
when `make'.
Without this package, i'm unable to send mail by gmail in
On Oct 30, 2007, at 1:26 AM, Martin Costabel wrote:
That is, it interprets the escaped backslashes plus the following
character as escape sequences. This is a buggy implementation not of
POSIX conformance, but of XSI extensions of the POSIX standard, see
Hello
I am unable to install any new fink packages due to problems with sudo.
$ fink update qt3
Password:
username is not in the sudoers file. This incident will be reported.
I tried to edit my /private/etc/sudoers file using visudo but I run into the
same problem.
$ sudo visudo
username is
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
David Lowe wrote:
On Oct 30, 2007, at 1:26 AM, Martin Costabel wrote:
That is, it interprets the escaped backslashes plus the following
character as escape sequences. This is a buggy implementation
not of POSIX conformance, but of XSI extensions
Ebrahim Mayat wrote:
Hello
I am unable to install any new fink packages due to problems with sudo.
$ fink update qt3
Password:
username is not in the sudoers file. This incident will be reported.
I tried to edit my /private/etc/sudoers file using visudo but I run into
the same
On Tuesday, October 30, 2007, at 06:53AM, Alexander K. Hansen [EMAIL
PROTECTED] wrote:
Run which sudo. If it's /usr/bin/sudo then your issue is with
Leopard rather than Fink, and you'll probably have to do a clean install
of some sort.
Hi Alex
Yes, that is indeed the case.
$ which sudo
Ebrahim Mayat wrote:
On Tuesday, October 30, 2007, at 06:53AM, Alexander K. Hansen [EMAIL
PROTECTED] wrote:
Run which sudo. If it's /usr/bin/sudo then your issue is with
Leopard rather than Fink, and you'll probably have to do a clean install
of some sort.
Hi Alex
Yes,
On Tuesday, October 30, 2007, at 07:14AM, Alexander K. Hansen [EMAIL
PROTECTED] wrote:
Or maybe Archive and Install. Before you go that far, you might try
checking on /etc/sudoers--though I think you'll have to boot into
single-user mode (hold down command+s during startup) to see it, because
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ebrahim Mayat wrote:
# User privilege specification
rootALL=(ALL) ALL
%admin ALL=(ALL) ALL
I haven't followed this whole conversation, but why don't you just log
in as the admin user on your machine and add yourself?
Or did you somehow end
On Tue, 30 Oct 2007 10:46:02 -0400
Alexander K. Hansen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
David Lowe wrote:
On Oct 30, 2007, at 1:26 AM, Martin Costabel wrote:
That is, it interprets the escaped backslashes plus the following
character as escape
On Tuesday, October 30, 2007, at 08:04AM, Benjamin Reed [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I haven't followed this whole conversation, but why don't you just log
in as the admin user on your machine and add yourself?
Or did you somehow end up without an admin account of any kind?
Ranger
Yes, updating
David Lowe wrote:
[]
I'm not a frequent contributor, and may be missing something here,
but doesn't the open group web page hint that 'echo' is deprecated
and the use of 'printf' is encouraged? I'm not a very experienced
programmer, how much work would it be to make that change in
On 10/30/07, Alexander Hansen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10/30/07, Ebrahim Mayat [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tuesday, October 30, 2007, at 08:04AM, Benjamin Reed [EMAIL
PROTECTED] wrote:
I haven't followed this whole conversation, but why don't you just log
in as the admin user on
Kevin Horton wrote:
[]
I have a good relationship with the author of cadabra. I expect that he will
agree to modify the original sources, if the change does not cause problems
on other architectures. I have already informed him of the problem, and
Martin's suggested fixes. I will try to
from macfixit:
Admin accounts inadvertently converted to standard after Leopard
install; fix
Users are reporting a strange phenomenon where their administrator
user accounts are converted to standard user accounts after
installation of Mac OS X 10.5 (Leopard).
MacFixIt reader Ed
Alexander K. Hansen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
According to http://pdb.finkproject.org/pdb/browse.php?summary=gnutls
there's no gnutls-bin package in Fink at all for any OS version.
The gnutls12 and gnutls14 main packages contain executables, and both
are available for Leopard.
Oh, right, the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
William Xu wrote:
Alexander K. Hansen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
According to http://pdb.finkproject.org/pdb/browse.php?summary=gnutls
there's no gnutls-bin package in Fink at all for any OS version.
The gnutls12 and gnutls14 main packages contain
On Tuesday, October 30, 2007, at 08:45AM, Matthew Parry [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
The solution for this issue is to create a root account and then
assigning admin privileges to the relegated account by starting in
single-user mode and entering these commands:
mount -uw /
passwd root (you
Alexander K. Hansen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The 154 packages suggests to me that you need to run
a fink selfupdate-rsync.
Ah, after a `fink selfupdate', everything works fine ! This is a big
difference from debian's apt-get, with which one only has to do apt-get
update, even for updating apt
William Xu wrote:
Alexander K. Hansen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The 154 packages suggests to me that you need to run
a fink selfupdate-rsync.
Ah, after a `fink selfupdate', everything works fine ! This is a big
difference from debian's apt-get, with which one only has to do
Hi all,
Ok, this seems odd to me: whenever I start Vim in a terminal, X11 launches.
I'm not trying GVim, which I would expect to launch an X11 session. I'm just
using Vim in a terminal. Does anyone have a guess what setting has gotten
its wires crossed?
Thanks, T
In Leopard, launching any program which is linked to an X11 library
causes X11 to launch automatically. I guess vim must be linked to an
X11 library.
-- Dave
On Oct 30, 2007, at 3:55 PM, Telemachus Odysseos wrote:
Hi all,
Ok, this seems odd to me: whenever I start Vim in a terminal,
On Tue, 30 Oct 2007, Telemachus Odysseos wrote:
Ok, this seems odd to me: whenever I start Vim in a terminal, X11 launches.
I'm not trying GVim, which I would expect to launch an X11 session. I'm just
using Vim in a terminal. Does anyone have a guess what setting has gotten
its wires crossed?
Sorry that my first response was too quick: I wasn't thinking about
the fact that fink has a vim-nox package as well as a vim package.
Presumably fink uninstall vim followed by fink install vim-nox
would fix your problem.
-- Dave
On Oct 30, 2007, at 4:06 PM, Telemachus Odysseos wrote:
Yeah, I got distracted with other things. Do you have a .info file to
build the current graphviz, or were you just doing it by hand?
I've got a working up-to-date graphviz in my experimental; thanks for
the reminder -- I mailed the maintainer and never heard back, so I was
going to go ahead
28 matches
Mail list logo
