Re: [Fink-users] sdl-1.2.14-1 build failure on 10.5/x84_64

2009-10-20 Thread Max Horn
Am 21.10.2009 um 01:44 schrieb Hanspeter Niederstrasser: > Max Horn wrote: >> FYI, I filed a bug report on the SDL bug tracker about this issue, >> feel free to add yourself to the CC list of that bug report if you >> are interested in the resolution or want to contribute to solving >> it

Re: [Fink-users] How do I get beamer and the latest version of PGF?

2009-10-20 Thread Martin Costabel
W.P. McNeill wrote: > I have a LaTeX installation via fink. I have installed the beamer > package, which requires the pgf package. > > The latest version of pgf available through stable or unstable fink is > 1.01. This is very old. I want to install the latest version 2.00 from > Sourceforge

[Fink-users] How do I get beamer and the latest version of PGF?

2009-10-20 Thread W.P. McNeill
I have a LaTeX installation via fink. I have installed the beamer package, which requires the pgf package. The latest version of pgf available through stable or unstable fink is 1.01. This is very old. I want to install the latest version 2.00 from Sourceforge. Here's what I tried: 1. fink

Re: [Fink-users] Problem with ddd package on 10.6

2009-10-20 Thread Alexander Hansen
JonAlf Dyrland-Weaver wrote: > Hello, > > I am running Snow Leopard on a MacBook Air, and am having a nagging > problem while installing certain packages. I am using a fresh install > of fink and when I try to install ddd I get the following error: > > checking whether compiling X headers requi

[Fink-users] Problem with ddd package on 10.6

2009-10-20 Thread JonAlf Dyrland-Weaver
Hello, I am running Snow Leopard on a MacBook Air, and am having a nagging problem while installing certain packages. I am using a fresh install of fink and when I try to install ddd I get the following error: checking whether compiling X headers requires -fpermissive... no checking for XOpen

Re: [Fink-users] sdl-1.2.14-1 build failure on 10.5/x84_64

2009-10-20 Thread Daniel Johnson
On Oct 20, 2009, at 7:44 PM, Hanspeter Niederstrasser wrote: Max Horn wrote: FYI, I filed a bug report on the SDL bug tracker about this issue, feel free to add yourself to the CC list of that bug report if you are interested in the resolution or want to contribute to solving it:

Re: [Fink-users] sdl-1.2.14-1 build failure on 10.5/x84_64

2009-10-20 Thread Hanspeter Niederstrasser
Max Horn wrote: > FYI, I filed a bug report on the SDL bug tracker about this issue, > feel free to add yourself to the CC list of that bug report if you are > interested in the resolution or want to contribute to solving it: >

Re: [Fink-users] sdl-1.2.14-1 build failure on 10.5/x84_64

2009-10-20 Thread Max Horn
FYI, I filed a bug report on the SDL bug tracker about this issue, feel free to add yourself to the CC list of that bug report if you are interested in the resolution or want to contribute to solving it: Cheers, Max Am 21.10.2009 um 00:30 s

Re: [Fink-users] sdl-1.2.14-1 build failure on 10.5/x84_64

2009-10-20 Thread Max Horn
Am 21.10.2009 um 00:30 schrieb Hanspeter Niederstrasser: > The new release of sdl 1.2.14 fails on 10.5/x86_64. It builds fine > on 10.5/32bit. The previous 1.2.13-svn4819 also built fine on both > architectures. > > This is the build error: > > /bin/sh ./libtool --mode=compile gcc-4.0 -g -O

[Fink-users] sdl-1.2.14-1 build failure on 10.5/x84_64

2009-10-20 Thread Hanspeter Niederstrasser
The new release of sdl 1.2.14 fails on 10.5/x86_64. It builds fine on 10.5/32bit. The previous 1.2.13-svn4819 also built fine on both architectures. This is the build error: /bin/sh ./libtool --mode=compile gcc-4.0 -g -O2 -I/sw64/include -I./include -D_GNU_SOURCE=1 -DTARGET_API_MAC_CARBON -D

Re: [Fink-users] Perl version stop the Fink Installation (Snow Leopard)

2009-10-20 Thread Alexander Hansen
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Johann PELLET wrote: > >> >> One issue you may face later is that the fink package manager, not just >> the bootstrap script, expects /usr/bin/perl to be perl5.10.0 on 10.6. >> > > If I understand, after the installation, if /usr/bin/perl is perl5.8.

Re: [Fink-users] Perl version stop the Fink Installation (Snow Leopard)

2009-10-20 Thread Alexander Hansen
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Johann PELLET wrote: > I have changed in boostrap: > l1: #!/usr/bin/env -i /usr/bin/perl5.10.0 -w > > l27: #use 5.008_001; # perl 5.8.1 or newer required > > and run boostrap with this command: > /usr/bin/perl5.10.0 bootstrap > > and it seems to wo

Re: [Fink-users] Perl version stop the Fink Installation (Snow Leopard)

2009-10-20 Thread Johann PELLET
I have changed in boostrap: l1: #!/usr/bin/env -i /usr/bin/perl5.10.0 -w l27: #use 5.008_001; # perl 5.8.1 or newer required and run boostrap with this command: /usr/bin/perl5.10.0 bootstrap and it seems to work: # Writing updated configuration to '/sw/etc/fink.conf'... plist is dpkg-boots

Re: [Fink-users] Using unstable/64bit tree

2009-10-20 Thread Alexander Hansen
Florian Lindner wrote: > Hello, > > on 10.5 I've been always been using fink unstable tree and I was quite > happy with it. Now I've upgraded to 10.6 and wanted to give the > unstable 64bit tree a try. But the source installations of 0.29.10 > does not prompt for the selection of a tree. > >

[Fink-users] Using unstable/64bit tree

2009-10-20 Thread Florian Lindner
Hello, on 10.5 I've been always been using fink unstable tree and I was quite happy with it. Now I've upgraded to 10.6 and wanted to give the unstable 64bit tree a try. But the source installations of 0.29.10 does not prompt for the selection of a tree. - Is there any reason for this? - Wha

Re: [Fink-users] FFTW double precision library files not found in /sw/lib

2009-10-20 Thread monipol
(kicking back to the list) I don't know why but you've got x86_64 (64-bit) libraries on your 32- bit Fink installation, Christoph. It could be the case that atlas' build process somehow overwrites Fink's gcc -arch i386. Can someone on 10.6/i386 check whether atlas builds with the correct targ