>>
>>> That failure is correct, since the fink package is _supposed_ to build as
>>> root. I'm not sure how it's even _possible_ for you to try to build fink
>>> under a non-root user without modifying
>>> /sw/fink/dists/stable/main/finkinfo/base/fink-10.8.info and removing the
>>> "BuildAsNo
On 6/1/13 4:15 PM, Boaz Ilan wrote:
>
> On Jun 1, 2013, at 2:30 PM, Alexander Hansen
> wrote:
>
>> On 6/1/13 1:36 PM, Boaz Ilan wrote:
>>>
>>> selfupdate fails to compile fink-buildlock-fink-0.34.8-71, with error
>>
>> (not fink-buildlock-fink, but fink)
>>
>>>
>>> # Failed test 'requires norm
On Jun 1, 2013, at 2:30 PM, Alexander Hansen
wrote:
> On 6/1/13 1:36 PM, Boaz Ilan wrote:
>>
>> selfupdate fails to compile fink-buildlock-fink-0.34.8-71, with error
>
> (not fink-buildlock-fink, but fink)
>
>>
>> # Failed test 'requires normal user but build_as_nobody enabled'
>> This i
On 6/1/13 1:36 PM, Boaz Ilan wrote:
>
> selfupdate fails to compile fink-buildlock-fink-0.34.8-71, with error
(not fink-buildlock-fink, but fink)
>
> # Failed test 'requires normal user but build_as_nobody enabled'
> # at ./Services/execute_nonroot_okay.t line 105.
> # got: 0
> #
selfupdate fails to compile fink-buildlock-fink-0.34.8-71, with error
# Failed test 'requires normal user but build_as_nobody enabled'
# at ./Services/execute_nonroot_okay.t line 105.
# got: 0
# expected: anything else
# Looks like you failed 1 test of 12.
./Services/execute_nonr
On Sat, Jun 01, 2013 at 08:53:17AM +0200, Dominique Dhumieres wrote:
> Jack,
>
> Before entering how the different gcc are installed on my system,
> let me say that the following change allowed me to update gcc48
>
> [karma] /Users/dominiq% diff /sw/var/lib/fink/path-prefix-g++-4.0/g++~
> /sw/va
On Sat, Jun 01, 2013 at 08:53:17AM +0200, Dominique Dhumieres wrote:
> Jack,
>
> Before entering how the different gcc are installed on my system,
> let me say that the following change allowed me to update gcc48
>
> [karma] /Users/dominiq% diff /sw/var/lib/fink/path-prefix-g++-4.0/g++~
> /sw/va
