Re: [Fink-users] Fink 0.10

I have put code into CVS that makes it rebuild the package database upong selfupdate only if the fink package was updated. Cheers, Max -- --- Max Horn Software Developer email: phone: (+49) 6151-494890 -

Re: [Fink-users] Fink 0.10

On Fri, 9 Aug 2002, paul beard wrote: > Koen van der Drift wrote: > > (after a fink selfupdate-cvs) > > [snip] > > So a total of 134 seconds :( > > > > I am running a 400 MHz G3 iMac and 320 MB. > > on a G3 350 with 384, I got 156 and 76 seconds: almost 4 minutes. It's been slow for me too l

Re: [Fink-users] Fink 0.10

Koen van der Drift wrote: > (after a fink selfupdate-cvs) > > Reading package info... > Updating package index... done. > Information about 1327 packages read in 86 seconds. > > No packages to install. > Re-executing fink to use the new version... > Reading package info... > Updating package i

Re: [Fink-users] Fink 0.10

At 12:34 PM +0200 8/9/02, Max Horn wrote: >I guess I could conditionalize this cache rebuild to when the "fink" >package is updated, in other cases only the normal single cache >rebuild is necessary. That would be great, Max. It is actually worse than I first described: (after a fink selfupd

Re: [Fink-users] Fink 0.10

At 22:14 Uhr -0400 08.08.2002, Koen van der Drift wrote: >Hi, > >After updating to Fink 0.10, updating the package index after an selfupdate >is *much* slower: 40-50 sec instead of 3-4 sec what is used to be with >0.9.12. However the 'fink list' command only takes a few seconds. I have >done an 'f

Re: [Fink-users] Fink 0.10

At 22:55 Uhr -0500 08.08.2002, Brandon Potter wrote: >Just as an FYI, >Fink list : 30 seconds Even after your index is uptodate ("fink index") ? In that case, wow, you sure have a very very slow hard disk :-) Although for me the whole Fink cache seems to be fit into the system disk cache (after

Re: [Fink-users] Fink 0.10

Just as an FYI, Fink list : 30 seconds Fink selfupdate-cvs : 4 min, 20 seconds (no packages to install) Hmmm, maybe code optimization for 10.2 hurts older systems? I believe I read a posting earlier that 0.10.0-1 was supposed to work okay on 10.2, but I may have imagined it. BTW, I've got an old

[Fink-users] Fink 0.10

Hi, After updating to Fink 0.10, updating the package index after an selfupdate is *much* slower: 40-50 sec instead of 3-4 sec what is used to be with 0.9.12. However the 'fink list' command only takes a few seconds. I have done an 'fink index'. - Koen.