On Mon, Jun 07, 2010 at 10:25:51PM +0200, Dominique Dhumieres wrote:
> > I won't disable gcj in fink's libtool yet, I'd like to see if I get more
> > reports of failures.
>
> What is working is to use gcc44.
Is this the same issue of gcj in gcc 4.5.0 not compiling java under
darwin9? If so, gcc 4
> I won't disable gcj in fink's libtool yet, I'd like to see if I get more
> reports of failures.
What is working is to use gcc44.
> Can you check that it also hangs without -fno-common, then run the same
> thing under gdb, wait a while, interrupt it and get a backtrace and file
> a bug.
Without
On 06/07/2010 11:51 AM, Dominique Dhumieres wrote:
> Hi Peter,
>
>> That seems nasty, ...
>
> Indeed!-(
>
>
> With 4.5 I had to interupt the compilation:
>
> [karma] libtool2-2.2.8-1/libtool-2.2.8% time sudo gcj -c -g -O2 -I/sw/include
> -fno-common conftest.java
> ^C0.012u 0.019s 2:04.73 0.0% 0
Hi Peter,
> That seems nasty, ...
Indeed!-(
I have done the following:
[macbook] f90/bug% cat > conftest.java
class foo {}
[macbook] f90/bug% time gcj -c -g -O2 -I/sw/include -fno-common conftest.java
0.834u 0.588s 0:05.47 25.7% 0+0k 30+48io 0pf+0w
on x86_64-apple-darwin10.3.0.
With 4.4 o
On 06/07/2010 04:50 AM, Dominique Dhumieres wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On ppc OSX 10.5.8 I have tried to update to libtool2-2.2.8-1 with
> gcc45 and the configure phase got stuck at
>
> ...
> checking for gcj option to produce PIC... -fno-common
> checking if gcj PIC flag -fno-common works...
>
> The test to
Hi,
On ppc OSX 10.5.8 I have tried to update to libtool2-2.2.8-1 with
gcc45 and the configure phase got stuck at
...
checking for gcj option to produce PIC... -fno-common
checking if gcj PIC flag -fno-common works...
The test took an unusual long time and started to grab all my
1.5Gb of RAM unti
