I've noticed that very recently completion for the 'open' command seems
broken. I'm running 10.5.1, and bash-completion-20060301-3 under fink 0.28.0
.
Here's an example of when I try to complete a file name with TAB:
[machine:/usr/src/swdocs/dev/vhaag/projects/hh]
$ open fo-bash: COMP_WORDS[2]:
On Thursday 24 January 2008 11:13:10 am Viktor Haag wrote:
I've noticed that very recently completion for the 'open' command seems
broken. I'm running 10.5.1, and bash-completion-20060301-3 under fink
0.28.0 .
Here's an example of when I try to complete a file name with TAB:
On Jan 24, 2008 11:13 AM, Viktor Haag [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[machine:/usr/src/swdocs/dev/vhaag/projects/hh]
$ open fo-bash: COMP_WORDS[2]: unbound variable
That looks like you've defined some custom completion rules using the
complete builtin, and something in your completion func is
On 24/01/2008, Mark J. Reed [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jan 24, 2008 11:13 AM, Viktor Haag [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[machine:/usr/src/swdocs/dev/vhaag/projects/hh]
$ open fo-bash: COMP_WORDS[2]: unbound variable
That looks like you've defined some custom completion rules using the
On Thursday 24 January 2008 01:56:33 pm Viktor Haag wrote:
On 24/01/2008, Alexander K. Hansen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It works for me, seemingly.
You're definitely on revision 3? This was added with a note from the
maintainer saying that it was supposed to contain fixes for bash 3.
Hrm... I will check, but to the best of my knowledge, I haven't added any such
custom completions
V.
--Original Message--
From: Mark J. Reed
Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Viktor Haag
Cc: fink-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Fink-users] Problem with bash-completion
@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Fink-users] Problem with bash-completion and 'open' command
under 10.5.1?
Sent: 24 Jan 2008 14:17
On Jan 24, 2008 1:53 PM, Viktor Haag [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have not done this to the best of my knowledge; where would such custom
completion rules get stored
On 24/01/2008, Mark J. Reed [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You would remember, i'm sure. It's possible some package or other did
such a thing - i can readily imagine adding custom completion to
open such that open -a completes further arguments as application
names from /Applications, for
On 24/01/2008, Mark J. Reed [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jan 24, 2008 1:53 PM, Viktor Haag [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have not done this to the best of my knowledge; where would such
custom
completion rules get stored?
The rules aren't persisted, so they would take the form of complete
such a thing - i can readily imagine adding custom completion to
open such that open -a completes further arguments as application
names from /Applications, for instance.
The _open completion function in zsh does this.
10 matches
Mail list logo
