Re: [Fink-users] Re: Building and installation directory.

2004-09-02 Thread Andrea Riciputi
I see, but you must admit that having traceback messages that report directories that don't exist it's not very nice. So if there is not any real reason to avoid the --root flag, I think we have to prefer it to --prefix as suggested by Daniel Macks. Cheers, Andrea. On 1 Sep 2004, at 16:

Re: [Fink-users] Re: Building and installation directory.

2004-09-01 Thread Martin Costabel
Andrea Riciputi wrote: I've tried --root=%d and I've got the same result for my packages. But before changing all of them I'd prefer to know the opinion of someone more experienced in Python... Well, I'm not experienced, but I know how to run 'grep' :-) It seems there are already some packages th

Re: [Fink-users] Re: Building and installation directory.

2004-09-01 Thread Andrea Riciputi
I've tried --root=%d and I've got the same result for my packages. But before changing all of them I'd prefer to know the opinion of someone more experienced in Python... Any comment? Andrea. On 1 Sep 2004, at 14:14, Daniel E. Macks wrote: I wonder if, in general, 'python setup.py instal

[Fink-users] Re: Building and installation directory.

2004-09-01 Thread Daniel E. Macks
I wonder if, in general, 'python setup.py install --prefix=%i' is the wrong idiom for the case where one wants to install in a temp location and then copy to the actual runtime location later. Looking at the output of 'python2.2 setup.py --help install', I see: --prefixinstallation p