Re: [Fink-users] Updating libgda-1.0.4-1 failed

2004-07-08 Thread jfm
Dominique, Reinstall openjade to get your installation back in a kosher state, then remove the BuildConflict line in libgda.info _ seems anyway not a proper use of it _ , and add --disable-gtk-doc at the end of the ConfigureParams line. Jean-Francois

Re: [Fink-users] Updating libgda-1.0.4-1 failed

2004-07-08 Thread Alexander K. Hansen
Actually, Dave M. put the BuildConflict line deliberately: I had a similar build problem with libgda-1.0.3-15, and it turned out that I had to remove openjade to get it to build successfully. On Jul 8, 2004, at 6:47 AM, jfm wrote: Dominique, Reinstall openjade to get your installation back in

Re: [Fink-users] Updating libgda-1.0.4-1 failed

2004-07-08 Thread Dominique Dhumieres
On Jul 8, 2004, at 8:05 AM, Alex hansen wrote: Actually, Dave M. put the BuildConflict line deliberately: I had a similar build problem with libgda-1.0.3-15, and it turned out that I had to remove openjade to get it to build successfully. Reinstall openjade to get your installation back

Re: [Fink-users] Updating libgda-1.0.4-1 failed

2004-07-08 Thread Alexander K. Hansen
I think the BuildConflicts code isn't really implemented. On Jul 8, 2004, at 9:22 AM, Dominique Dhumieres wrote: On Jul 8, 2004, at 8:05 AM, Alex hansen wrote: Actually, Dave M. put the BuildConflict line deliberately: I had a similar build problem with libgda-1.0.3-15, and it turned out that I

Re: [Fink-users] Updating libgda-1.0.4-1 failed

2004-07-08 Thread jfm
On Jul 8, 2004, at 2:05 PM, Alexander K. Hansen wrote: Actually, Dave M. put the BuildConflict line deliberately: I had a similar build problem with libgda-1.0.3-15, and it turned out that I had to remove openjade to get it to build successfully. I realize well _ that's why I said to add