Re: [Fink-users] automatic mirror selection

2006-02-11 Thread Dan Sommers
On 2006-02-11 at 09:21:46 -0600, Robert T Wyatt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > ... What would happen with > > /usr/bin/yes 5|fink update-all > > If the options only run 1-4? Would I have to be there to escape the > process? yes is as stupid a utility as there is; so, yes (pun intended), a person

Re: [Fink-users] automatic mirror selection

2006-02-11 Thread Robert T Wyatt
Dan Sommers wrote: My first thought was something analogous to this: yes|fink update-all and my second thought was, "oh, yeah, fink has that": fink -y update-all and my third, "oops--mirror selection isn't a yes/no question!" ;-) OTOH, it's not pretty, but you could do this: /

Re: [Fink-users] automatic mirror selection

2006-02-11 Thread Dan Sommers
On 2006-02-11 at 02:02:23 -0600, Robert T Wyatt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > It occurs to me, while downloading 234 source packages, that it would > be downright handy to ask fink to automatically try package-defined > mirrors upon a 404 and then descend through other mirrors, etc. I > figure as l

[Fink-users] automatic mirror selection

2006-02-11 Thread Robert T Wyatt
It occurs to me, while downloading 234 source packages, that it would be downright handy to ask fink to automatically try package-defined mirrors upon a 404 and then descend through other mirrors, etc. I figure as long as it winds up with an automatic 'give-up' or a required user operation, at