On 15 Mar 2011, at 02:26, PNM wrote:
> Ok, but since you are having the same problems with pan on fink 64-
> bit, it's safe to say that Xquartz is not the problem?
Didn't see the original problem in this thread, but I can only concur :
on 10.5.8 , pan has no problems in 32bit mode, but fails in
Am 14.03.2011 um 16:59 schrieb PNM:
> Hi everyone,
>
> Will the pan issue on 64-bit fink be resolved anytime soon?
Yes, for a suitable definition of "soon". I am currently moving (and have been
since the weekend), so bear with me.
Bye,
Max
>
> One thing I forgot to add is that I am also us
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 3/14/11 9:26 PM, PNM wrote:
> On Mar 14, 2011, at 9:29 AM, Alexander Hansen wrote:
>
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> On 3/14/11 11:59 AM, PNM wrote:
>>> Hi everyone,
>>>
>>> Will the pan issue on 64-bit fink be resolved an
On Mar 14, 2011, at 9:29 AM, Alexander Hansen wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 3/14/11 11:59 AM, PNM wrote:
>> Hi everyone,
>>
>> Will the pan issue on 64-bit fink be resolved anytime soon?
>>
>> One thing I forgot to add is that I am also using Xquartz 2.6 and X
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 3/14/11 11:59 AM, PNM wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> Will the pan issue on 64-bit fink be resolved anytime soon?
>
> One thing I forgot to add is that I am also using Xquartz 2.6 and Xcode 4.
>
> Thanks.
>
> Payam
> =
> "It is not within our p
Hi everyone,
Will the pan issue on 64-bit fink be resolved anytime soon?
One thing I forgot to add is that I am also using Xquartz 2.6 and Xcode 4.
Thanks.
Payam
=
"It is not within our power to destroy our thoughts. As for destroying their
material forms, that could be like committing
