Re: [Fink-users] update-all question

2002-04-21 Thread Nicholas Robbins
Well, thanks for clearing it up. So basically, over time some packages grow and/or outsource their functionality. I do have a free couple days, and ample hd space. - Nicholas Robbins __ "Liverpool can be a lonely place on a Saturday night, and it's

Re: [Fink-users] update-all question

2002-04-20 Thread Chris Devers
On Sat, 20 Apr 2002, Nicholas Robbins wrote: > Ok, what I still don't understand is: I am not adding anything, just > updating, so why did my already installed packages now need 45 new > things? It looks like 20 of them are splitings of packages I already > have, like esound and gimp, so those I

Re: [Fink-users] update-all question

2002-04-20 Thread Nicholas Robbins
Ok, what I still don't understand is: I am not adding anything, just updating, so why did my already installed packages now need 45 new things? It looks like 20 of them are splitings of packages I already have, like esound and gimp, so those I understand. But why do I need 25 new packages? I

Re: [Fink-users] update-all question

2002-04-20 Thread Chris Devers
On Sat, 20 Apr 2002, Nicholas Robbins wrote: > The following 31 packages will be installed or updated: > app-defaults audiofile dlcompat esound freeciv freetype2 fvwm-common > fvwm2-no-gnome gdbm gdk-pixbuf ghostscript-fonts gimp gnome-libs gtk+ gv > hyperref libpng libstroke libtiff libxml2 n

[Fink-users] update-all question

2002-04-20 Thread Nicholas Robbins
Ok, I have another question. I wanted to see what would be updated if I did an update-all, so I did one while not on the internet (knowing it would attempt to d/l stuff and so nothing would actually happen.) This is what I got: pleonasm,[~],2:59pm:fink update-all sudo /sw/bin/fink update-all Read