On 6/20/14, 6:40 AM, Lowell Tacconi-Garman wrote:
> Thank you very much for your help, and apologies for the too-general
> subject line of my e-mail. Your solution worked perfectly.
Thanks for following up. Since that worked for you as well as for me,
I'll suggest that David make this an offici
Thank you very much for your help, and apologies for the too-general
subject line of my e-mail. Your solution worked perfectly.
> (Changing the subject to something more specific so that other people
> having this problem can find the thread more easily. "update-all" isn't
> really the relevant
On 12/24/2012 6:53 PM, Peter Dyballa wrote:
> Hello!
>
> ImageMagick cannot use installed Graphviz because none of the PC files (for
> pkg-config) is installed. And eight of them are built:
>
> /sw/build.build/graphviz-2.26.3-6/graphviz-2.26.3/lib/cdt/libcdt.pc
>
> /sw/build.build/gra
On 31/07/12 10:08, Attila Krasznahorkay wrote:
> Hi Alexander,
>
> Okay, after I moved graphviz.patch in the right place, now the installation
> almost finished.
>
> Now it fails in compiling root5 itself, with the following messages:
>
> clang++ -O2 -m64 -pipe -Wshadow -W -Wall -Woverloaded-virtu
Hi Alexander,
Okay, after I moved graphviz.patch in the right place, now the installation
almost finished.
Now it fails in compiling root5 itself, with the following messages:
clang++ -O2 -m64 -pipe -Wshadow -W -Wall -Woverloaded-virtual -fsigned-char
-fno-common -Iinclude -DR__HAVE_CONFIG
On 7/29/12 12:41 PM, Alexander Hansen wrote:
> On 7/29/12 12:28 PM, Attila Krasznahorkay wrote:
>> Hi Alexander,
>>
>> This should be the full command, and then the failure:
>>
>> g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -DNDEBUG -I. -I. -I../../../.. -I. -I../../../../include
>> -I../../../../ndb/include -I../../../.
On 7/29/12 12:28 PM, Attila Krasznahorkay wrote:
> Hi Alexander,
>
> This should be the full command, and then the failure:
>
> g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -DNDEBUG -I. -I. -I../../../.. -I. -I../../../../include
> -I../../../../ndb/include -I../../../../include -I../../../../mysys
> -I../../../../ndb/
Hi Alexander,
This should be the full command, and then the failure:
g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -DNDEBUG -I. -I. -I../../../.. -I. -I../../../../include
-I../../../../ndb/include -I../../../../include -I../../../../mysys
-I../../../../ndb/include -I../../../../ndb/include/util
-I../../../../ndb/inclu
On 7/29/12 9:39 AM, Attila Krasznahorkay wrote:
> Hi Hanspeter,
>
> I followed your advice about forcing the machine to use the same version of
> the package on 10.8 as is used on 10.7. This did make the installation start,
> but the compilation didn't succeed.
>
> But it wasn't graphviz that d
Hi Hanspeter,
I followed your advice about forcing the machine to use the same version of the
package on 10.8 as is used on 10.7. This did make the installation start, but
the compilation didn't succeed.
But it wasn't graphviz that didn't build (not even sure if the installation
ever got that
On 7/29/2012 6:35 AM, Attila Krasznahorkay wrote:
> Dear All,
>
> I'm sure that this is just a small teething issue, but here it goes.
>
> I decided to wipe out /sw on one of my computers when upgrading to Mountain
> Lion, as I had way too many things installed that I didn't use on that
> machine
> Thanks for the patch, JF,
> Several revisions ago, graphviz was building against fink's Ruby
> and Tcl, but Peter (CCd) helped patch this package to build against
> Apple's Ruby and Tcl to trim down the dependencies. Is there an
> official/preferred policy now that 10.6 is upon us?
I've r
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 9/28/09 10:05 AM, David R. Morrison wrote:
> We don't yet have Fink's Ruby package working on 10.6, and I'm not
> sure anybody has worked on that. Hopefully some ruby afficionado will
> take on that issue, and restore fink-built ruby to fink;
On Sep 28, 2009, at 7:01 AM, David Fang wrote:
>>> I was able to reproduce this error with an upgraded 10.6 build, but
>>> haven't looked into fixing it yet. I haven't forgotten!
>>
>> I fixed my local info file for this problem , by avoiding APple's
>> stuff
>> (there was a time where it was
>> I was able to reproduce this error with an upgraded 10.6 build, but
>> haven't looked into fixing it yet. I haven't forgotten!
>
> I fixed my local info file for this problem , by avoiding APple's stuff
> (there was a time where it was basically policy to use fink's stuff
> rather than Apple's,
On 28 Sep 2009, at 08:41, David Fang wrote:
> I was able to reproduce this error with an upgraded 10.6 build, but
> haven't looked into fixing it yet. I haven't forgotten!
>
I fixed my local info file for this problem , by avoiding APple's stuff
(there was a time where it was basically policy t
>> On 16/09/2009, at 16:33, Stefan Bruda wrote:
>>> Building graphviz fails with the following error:
>>>
>>> gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I../.. -DUSE_TCL_STUBS -DUSE_TK_STUBS
>>> -I/System/Library/Frameworks/Tk.framework/Versions/8.4/Headers
>>> -I/System/Library/Frameworks/JavaVM.framework/Versions/
> On 16/09/2009, at 16:33, Stefan Bruda wrote:
>> Building graphviz fails with the following error:
>>
>> gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I../.. -DUSE_TCL_STUBS -DUSE_TK_STUBS
>> -I/System/Library/Frameworks/Tk.framework/Versions/8.4/Headers
>> -I/System/Library/Frameworks/JavaVM.framework/Versions/A/H
On 16/09/2009, at 16:33, Stefan Bruda wrote:
> Building graphviz fails with the following error:
>
> gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I../.. -DUSE_TCL_STUBS -DUSE_TK_STUBS -I/
> System/Library/Frameworks/Tk.framework/Versions/8.4/Headers -I/
> System/Library/Frameworks/JavaVM.framework/Versions/A/Headers
>>> I've got a working up-to-date graphviz in my experimental; thanks for
>>> the reminder -- I mailed the maintainer and never heard back, so I was
>>> going to go ahead and take it over.
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I was fiddling around with a local .info for graphviz-2.14 as well.
>> According to the webpag
On Wed, Oct 31, 2007 at 01:17:09AM -0400, David Fang wrote:
> >> Yeah, I got distracted with other things. Do you have a .info file to
> >> build the current graphviz, or were you just doing it by hand?
> >
> > I've got a working up-to-date graphviz in my experimental; thanks for
> > the reminder
>> Yeah, I got distracted with other things. Do you have a .info file to
>> build the current graphviz, or were you just doing it by hand?
>
> I've got a working up-to-date graphviz in my experimental; thanks for
> the reminder -- I mailed the maintainer and never heard back, so I was
> going to g
Alexander K. Hansen wrote:
> Yeah, I got distracted with other things. Do you have a .info file to
> build the current graphviz, or were you just doing it by hand?
I've got a working up-to-date graphviz in my experimental; thanks for
the reminder -- I mailed the maintainer and never heard back,
Benoit Hudson wrote:
> I haven't seen any progress on graphviz since:
> http://www.mail-archive.com/fink-users@lists.sourceforge.net/msg24803.html
>
> The current fink version doesn't exactly work, but graphviz builds
> cleanly when told to use /sw/include and /sw/lib. Any indication that
> the
On Fri, Mar 09, 2007 at 10:57:11AM -0500, Alexander K. Hansen wrote:
> Alexander Hansen wrote:
> >On 2/28/07, Gregory Seidman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>On Wed, Feb 28, 2007 at 12:50:10PM -0500, Alexander Hansen wrote:
> >>>On 2/28/07, Gregory Seidman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The versio
Alexander Hansen wrote:
> On 2/28/07, Gregory Seidman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Feb 28, 2007 at 12:50:10PM -0500, Alexander Hansen wrote:
>>
>>> On 2/28/07, Gregory Seidman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>
The version of GraphViz in Fink is pretty old (1.16 when the
On 2/28/07, Gregory Seidman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 28, 2007 at 12:50:10PM -0500, Alexander Hansen wrote:
> > On 2/28/07, Gregory Seidman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >The version of GraphViz in Fink is pretty old (1.16 when the latest is
> > >2.12). Would someone be willing to u
On Wed, Feb 28, 2007 at 12:50:10PM -0500, Alexander Hansen wrote:
> On 2/28/07, Gregory Seidman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >The version of GraphViz in Fink is pretty old (1.16 when the latest is
> >2.12). Would someone be willing to update it? I'd like to offer to help,
> >but I'm really short on
On 2/28/07, Gregory Seidman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The version of GraphViz in Fink is pretty old (1.16 when the latest is
> 2.12). Would someone be willing to update it? I'd like to offer to help,
> but I'm really short on time these days. (Actually, I suspect that a lack
> of time on the par
On Mar 7, 2004, at 2:20 PM, Ian Johnson wrote:
Yesterday, I had some problems compiling guile (as part of the
bundle-gnome 2.4 convenience package) that were solved by removing
gawk. Now I am having similar problems compiling graphviz, but gawk is
listed as a dependency for this package, and I
On 2004/03/07, at 18:23, Martin Costabel wrote:
Ian Johnson wrote:
Yesterday, I had some problems compiling guile (as part of the
bundle-gnome 2.4 convenience package) that were solved by removing
gawk. Now I am having similar problems compiling graphviz, but gawk
is listed as a dependency for
Ian Johnson wrote:
Yesterday, I had some problems compiling guile (as part of the
bundle-gnome 2.4 convenience package) that were solved by removing gawk.
Now I am having similar problems compiling graphviz, but gawk is listed
as a dependency for this package, and I can't get it to install with
I just tried compiling it with FinkCommander and it worked!
Cheers,
Gary
On Monday, March 17, 2003, at 10:06 AM, plumber wrote:
gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I../.. -I../../dotneato/dotgen
-I../../dotneato/neatogen -I../../dotneato/twopigen -I../../graph
-I../../cdt -I../../pathplan -I../../gd
33 matches
Mail list logo
