Re: [Fink-users] octave.info gcc-4.3

2008-03-13 Thread Alexander Hansen
Ben Abbott wrote: The current octave.info files still points to gcc4.2 library. Should this not be updated to respect gcc4.3? ConfigureParams: FLIBS=%p/lib/gcc4.2/lib/libgfortran.dylib F77=%p/bin/gfortran --infodir='${prefix}/share/info' --mandir='${prefix}/share/man'

Re: [Fink-users] octave.info gcc-4.3

2008-03-13 Thread Ben Abbott
On Mar 13, 2008, at 9:17 AM, Alexander Hansen wrote: Ben Abbott wrote: The current octave.info files still points to gcc4.2 library. Should this not be updated to respect gcc4.3? ConfigureParams: FLIBS=%p/lib/gcc4.2/lib/libgfortran.dylib F77=%p/ bin/gfortran

Re: [Fink-users] octave.info gcc-4.3

2008-03-13 Thread Alexander K. Hansen
On Thursday 13 March 2008 08:12:14 pm Ben Abbott wrote: On Mar 13, 2008, at 9:17 AM, Alexander Hansen wrote: Ben Abbott wrote: The current octave.info files still points to gcc4.2 library. Should this not be updated to respect gcc4.3? ConfigureParams:

Re: [Fink-users] octave.info gcc-4.3

2008-03-13 Thread Ben Abbott
On Mar 13, 2008, at 10:27 PM, Alexander K. Hansen wrote: On Thursday 13 March 2008 08:12:14 pm Ben Abbott wrote: On Mar 13, 2008, at 9:17 AM, Alexander Hansen wrote: Ben Abbott wrote: The current octave.info files still points to gcc4.2 library. Should this not be updated to respect gcc4.3?

Re: [Fink-users] octave.info gcc-4.3

2008-03-13 Thread Jean-François Mertens
On 14 Mar 2008, at 04:40, Ben Abbott wrote: There was a recent gfortran change in calling conventions for functions (not subroutines) that return complex variables. I suspect you are mixing the two methods here, compiling zqrqhv with a compiler that implements one of the methods, and using