Re: [Fink-users] sbcl Compile Problem

e package, a problem apparently showed up. > > In particular, in Source2, "powerpc" --> "x86" ... OK, I've resubmitted the sbcl-i386.info to use 1.0.2 for bootstrapping, rather than 1.0.23. Jesse -- Jesse Alama (al...@stanford.edu)

Re: [Fink-users] sbcl update breaks maxima, xmaxima

Hi Sean, Alex, I think I'm the root of the problem here -- I recently submitted an updated SBCL, bumping the version from 1.0.33 to 1.0.34, without corresponding with Alexander Hansen. I was quick to submit an update to SBCL because of an packaging problem with SBLC unrelated to (x)maxima. Je

[Fink-users] trouble building fpc on 64-bit fink

exe] Error 2 make[2]: *** [cycle] Error 2 make[1]: *** [compiler_cycle] Error 2 make: *** [build-stamp.-] Error 2 -- Jesse Alama http://centria.di.fct.unl.pt/~alama/ -- EditLive Enterprise is the world's most technica

Re: [Fink-users] trouble building fpc on 64-bit fink

Hi Michael, Schindler Karl-Michael wrote: > It should be fixed now. Can you please check? Yes, it does seem to work -- thanks! Jesse -- Jesse Alama http://centria.di.fct.unl.pt/~alama/ -- EditLive Enterprise is

[Fink-users] another gnucash2 problem

.6.5-2 9700:Replaces: ant (<< 1.6.5-1) 9701:Depends: system-java (>= 1.4-1), darwin (>= 8-1) What might be going on? Thanks, Jesse -- Jesse Alama ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) *10: Too many basic sentences in an inference

Re: [Fink-users] build issues with wesnoth-devel-1.3.4-11

n/ginstall: cannot remove `/sw/lib/python2.5/site-packages/wesnoth/__init__.py': Permission denied Byte-compiling python modules... wmltools.py Traceback (most recent call last): File "", line 15, in File "/sw/lib/python2.5/py_compile.py", line 135, in compile fc

Re: [Fink-users] arch-tla-1.3.5-1

;> Information about 6753 packages read in 1 seconds. >> Can't resolve dependency "patch" for package "arch-tla-1.3.5-1" (no >> matching >> packages/versions found) >> Exiting with failure. It seems tha

Re: [Fink-users] arch-tla-1.3.5-1

Martin Costabel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Jesse Alama wrote: > [] >> It seems that patch is missing in 10.5. What happened to it? > > Died of old age, perhaps :-) > Why does Fink need a 5 year old version of a utility that comes with the > system anyway? It

Re: [Fink-users] arch-tla-1.3.5-1

Martin Costabel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Jesse Alama wrote: >> Martin Costabel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> >>> Jesse Alama wrote: >>> [] >>>> It seems that patch is missing in 10.5. What happened to it? >>> Died of old

[Fink-users] report bugs with reportbug

heard from the developers of the packages against which I reported a bug. I take it therefore that reportbug isn't a good way to submit bugs against fink packages. Is that correct? Jesse -- Jesse Alama ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) --- This SF.Ne

Re: [Fink-users] unable to build python34

On Thu, May 14, 2015, at 02:31 PM, Daniel Johnson wrote: > > On May 14, 2015, at 8:21 AM, Jesse Alama wrote: > > > > On 10.10.3, I am able to get a ways into building python34, but the build > > ultimately fails (log file attached). Any idea what might be g

[Fink-users] unable to build r-base32

It seems that I can't build r-base32. I'm on 10.10.3. The error appears to lie in not being able to detect some part of X: in the configure stage, I see [snip] ... checking for IceConnectionNumber in -lICE... no checking X11/Intrinsic.h usability... no checking X11/Intrinsic.h presence... no ch

[Fink-users] unable to build python34

On 10.10.3, I am able to get a ways into building python34, but the build ultimately fails (log file attached). Any idea what might be going on? Thanks, Jesse WARNING: Xcode.app version (0.0) and Xcode Command Line Tools version (6.3) are not compatible. You may experience build errors. The f

Re: [Fink-users] unable to build r-base32

Alexander Hansen writes: > fink-0.38.4 stopped requiring the /usr/X11 and /usr/X11R6 convenience > symlinks for 10.8 and later. Unfortunately, package maintainers > didn’t exactly rush to update their packages accordingly. fink-0.38.5 > will revert to the old behavior, in which /usr/X11R6 must

Re: [Fink-users] Can't resolve dependency "sbcl (=1.2.12-1)" for package "maxima-5.36.1-2"

Hi Sean, Sean Lake writes: > No worries. The need isn't urgent on my end, but thank you for your > prompt response. This is my fault (sbcl package maintainer here). I should have coordinated the release of the latest SBCL with Alexander, but I'm not always consistent about doing that. Sorry