Re: [Fink-users] fink update-all

[Alexander Hansen]

> On Apr 22, 2015, at 23:38, Giacomo Petrini  wrote:
> 
> Il 22.04.2015 19:50, Jack Howarth ha scritto:
>>It is very likely that you have upgraded from Mavericks to Yosemite
>> without reinstalling Xquartz, The OS installation removes the
>> /usr/X11R6 and /usr/X11 symlinks preventing many fink builds from
>> finding the X11 headers.
> 
> Hello,
> given that this is a very common issue, it's not possible to put make 
> fink do some check and tell that XQuartz is not installed/required?
> 
> Best Regards
> Giacomo
> 
> 

fink does that already as part of the virtual package system.  The issue is 
that for fink-0.38.4 the tests were modified to treat Xquartz as installed if 
/opt/X11 is present.  The hope was that maintainers would modify their packages 
not to use lines like --x-libraries=/usr/X11R6/lib in configuring their builds. 
 Unfortunately that hasn’t happened.

Instead, I’m going to revert the change, and therefore mandate that /usr/X11R6 
be present for the X11 virtual packages to be installed.  Currently, because of 
the historical development of our X11 virtual packages, this will change error 
messages about missing headers to messages that the ‘x11-dev’ virtual package 
is nonexistent—which is also not particularly transparent to users.  It may be 
possible to adjust the X11 virtual package code to have the packages be 
available but not installed instead of nonexistent, but that’s going to take 
more time.

-- 
Alexander Hansen, Ph.D.
Fink User Liaison


--
BPM Camp - Free Virtual Workshop May 6th at 10am PDT/1PM EDT
Develop your own process in accordance with the BPMN 2 standard
Learn Process modeling best practices with Bonita BPM through live exercises
http://www.bonitasoft.com/be-part-of-it/events/bpm-camp-virtual- event?utm_
source=Sourceforge_BPM_Camp_5_6_15&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=VA_SF
___
Fink-users mailing list
Fink-users@lists.sourceforge.net
List archive:
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.os.macosx.fink.user
Subscription management:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users

Re: [Fink-users] fink update-all

[Giacomo Petrini]

Il 22.04.2015 19:50, Jack Howarth ha scritto:
> It is very likely that you have upgraded from Mavericks to Yosemite
> without reinstalling Xquartz, The OS installation removes the
> /usr/X11R6 and /usr/X11 symlinks preventing many fink builds from
> finding the X11 headers.

Hello,
given that this is a very common issue, it's not possible to put make 
fink do some check and tell that XQuartz is not installed/required?

Best Regards
Giacomo


--
BPM Camp - Free Virtual Workshop May 6th at 10am PDT/1PM EDT
Develop your own process in accordance with the BPMN 2 standard
Learn Process modeling best practices with Bonita BPM through live exercises
http://www.bonitasoft.com/be-part-of-it/events/bpm-camp-virtual- event?utm_
source=Sourceforge_BPM_Camp_5_6_15&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=VA_SF
___
Fink-users mailing list
Fink-users@lists.sourceforge.net
List archive:
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.os.macosx.fink.user
Subscription management:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users

Re: [Fink-users] fink update-all

[Reinhold Ludwig]

Yes that´s right, I have upgraded from Mavericks to Yosemite without
reinstalling Xquartz.
I will try to install Xquartz again and check afterwards also if the
symlinks are present again.

Many thanks for the hint.

Best Regards,

Reinhold

Am 22.04.15 um 19:50 schrieb Jack Howarth:
>It is very likely that you have upgraded from Mavericks to Yosemite
> without reinstalling Xquartz, The OS installation removes the
> /usr/X11R6 and /usr/X11 symlinks preventing many fink builds from
> finding the X11 headers.
>
> On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 12:00 PM, Reinhold Ludwig
>  wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I have problems using "fink update-all“. Also the selfupdate do not resolve 
>> the problem. Can you please help me find out where the problem is?
>>
>> Best Regards,
>>
>> Reinhold
>>
>>
>> libtool: compile:  gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I.. -I../include -I/sw/include 
>> -I/usr/X11R6/include -O3 -DTARGET_HOST_POSIX_X11 -I/sw/include 
>> -I/usr/X11R6/include -MT libfreeglut_la-freeglut_callbacks.lo -MD -MP -MF 
>> .deps/libfreeglut_la-freeglut_callbacks.Tpo -c freeglut_callbacks.c  
>> -fno-common -DPIC -o .libs/libfreeglut_la-freeglut_callbacks.o
>> In file included from freeglut_callbacks.c:29:
>> ./freeglut_internal.h:108:14: fatal error: 'GL/glx.h' file not found
>> #include 
>>  ^
>> 1 error generated.
>> make[2]: *** [libfreeglut_la-freeglut_callbacks.lo] Error 1
>> make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
>> make: *** [all] Error 2
>> ### execution of make failed, exit code 2
>> ### execution of /tmp/fink.yGMfU failed, exit code 2
>> Removing runtime build-lock...
>> Removing build-lock package...
>> /sw/bin/dpkg-lockwait -r fink-buildlock-freeglut-2.8.1-2
>> (Reading database ... 57390 files and directories currently installed.)
>> Removing fink-buildlock-freeglut-2.8.1-2 ...
>> Updating the list of locally available binary packages.
>> Scanning dists/stable/main/binary-darwin-x86_64
>> New package: 
>> dists/stable/main/binary-darwin-x86_64/base/fink_0.38.4-91_darwin-x86_64.deb
>> New package: 
>> dists/stable/main/binary-darwin-x86_64/libs/perlmods/file-temp-pm5182_0.23.04-3_darwin-x86_64.deb
>> Failed: phase compiling: freeglut-2.8.1-2 failed
>>
>>
>> Package manager version: 0.38.4
>> Distribution version: selfupdate-rsync Wed Apr 22 17:48:08 2015, 10.10, 
>> x86_64
>> Trees: local/main stable/main local/injected
>> Xcode.app: 6.3.1
>> Xcode command-line tools: 6.3.1.0.1.1429149539
>> Max. Fink build jobs:  1
>>




signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
--
BPM Camp - Free Virtual Workshop May 6th at 10am PDT/1PM EDT
Develop your own process in accordance with the BPMN 2 standard
Learn Process modeling best practices with Bonita BPM through live exercises
http://www.bonitasoft.com/be-part-of-it/events/bpm-camp-virtual- event?utm_
source=Sourceforge_BPM_Camp_5_6_15&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=VA_SF___
Fink-users mailing list
Fink-users@lists.sourceforge.net
List archive:
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.os.macosx.fink.user
Subscription management:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users

Re: [Fink-users] fink update-all

[Jack Howarth]

   It is very likely that you have upgraded from Mavericks to Yosemite
without reinstalling Xquartz, The OS installation removes the
/usr/X11R6 and /usr/X11 symlinks preventing many fink builds from
finding the X11 headers.

On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 12:00 PM, Reinhold Ludwig
 wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I have problems using "fink update-all“. Also the selfupdate do not resolve 
> the problem. Can you please help me find out where the problem is?
>
> Best Regards,
>
> Reinhold
>
>
> libtool: compile:  gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I.. -I../include -I/sw/include 
> -I/usr/X11R6/include -O3 -DTARGET_HOST_POSIX_X11 -I/sw/include 
> -I/usr/X11R6/include -MT libfreeglut_la-freeglut_callbacks.lo -MD -MP -MF 
> .deps/libfreeglut_la-freeglut_callbacks.Tpo -c freeglut_callbacks.c  
> -fno-common -DPIC -o .libs/libfreeglut_la-freeglut_callbacks.o
> In file included from freeglut_callbacks.c:29:
> ./freeglut_internal.h:108:14: fatal error: 'GL/glx.h' file not found
> #include 
>  ^
> 1 error generated.
> make[2]: *** [libfreeglut_la-freeglut_callbacks.lo] Error 1
> make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
> make: *** [all] Error 2
> ### execution of make failed, exit code 2
> ### execution of /tmp/fink.yGMfU failed, exit code 2
> Removing runtime build-lock...
> Removing build-lock package...
> /sw/bin/dpkg-lockwait -r fink-buildlock-freeglut-2.8.1-2
> (Reading database ... 57390 files and directories currently installed.)
> Removing fink-buildlock-freeglut-2.8.1-2 ...
> Updating the list of locally available binary packages.
> Scanning dists/stable/main/binary-darwin-x86_64
> New package: 
> dists/stable/main/binary-darwin-x86_64/base/fink_0.38.4-91_darwin-x86_64.deb
> New package: 
> dists/stable/main/binary-darwin-x86_64/libs/perlmods/file-temp-pm5182_0.23.04-3_darwin-x86_64.deb
> Failed: phase compiling: freeglut-2.8.1-2 failed
>
>
> Package manager version: 0.38.4
> Distribution version: selfupdate-rsync Wed Apr 22 17:48:08 2015, 10.10, x86_64
> Trees: local/main stable/main local/injected
> Xcode.app: 6.3.1
> Xcode command-line tools: 6.3.1.0.1.1429149539
> Max. Fink build jobs:  1
>

--
BPM Camp - Free Virtual Workshop May 6th at 10am PDT/1PM EDT
Develop your own process in accordance with the BPMN 2 standard
Learn Process modeling best practices with Bonita BPM through live exercises
http://www.bonitasoft.com/be-part-of-it/events/bpm-camp-virtual- event?utm_
source=Sourceforge_BPM_Camp_5_6_15&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=VA_SF
___
Fink-users mailing list
Fink-users@lists.sourceforge.net
List archive:
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.os.macosx.fink.user
Subscription management:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users

Re: [Fink-users] fink update-all will not temporarely remove gcc46

[Gerfried Kumbartzki]

Hi Alexander, 
removing gcc46 manually and installing the latest version cleared the way for a 
complete fink update-all.
Thanks a lot. Your contributions to 'fink' are outstanding.
Gerfried


Dr. Gerfried Kumbartzki
Department of Physics Rutgers University
voice: 732 445 5500 ext.8498
fax: 732 445 4343






--
Live Security Virtual Conference
Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and 
threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions 
will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware 
threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/
___
Fink-users mailing list
Fink-users@lists.sourceforge.net
List archive:
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.os.macosx.fink.user
Subscription management:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users

Re: [Fink-users] fink update-all fails on 10.7.4

[Attila Krasznahorkay]

Hi Alexander,

This seems to have done the trick, thanks!

Cheers,
  Attila

On May 15, 2012, at 3:40 PM, Alexander Hansen wrote:

> On 5/15/12 12:25 AM, Attila Krasznahorkay wrote:
>> Dear All,
>> 
>> I've updated my laptop to MacOS X 10.7.4 yesterday. Since then, when I do:
>> 
>> fink selfupdate
>> fink update-all
>> 
>> I get the following answer (after the second call, the first one goes 
>> through okay):
>> 
>> Information about 4756 packages read in 1 seconds.
>> Can't resolve dependency "xcode (>= 3.1.2)" for package "gcc47-4.7.0-1001" 
>> (no matching packages/versions found)
>> Exiting with failure.
>> 
>> Of course I didn't remove my Xcode installation with the update. I still 
>> have version 4.3.2 (I believe the newest one) installed under /Applications/.
>> 
>> Anyone know what this is about?
>> 
>> Cheers,
>>  Attila
>> 
>> -
>> Attila Krasznahorkay  attila.krasznahor...@cern.ch
>> New York University  Phone: +41-22-76 77368
>> The ATLAS Collaboration Room: 32-S-A19
>> -
>> 
>> 
>> 
> 
> What it's about is that Fink needs to be told where your Xcode
> application actually is:
> 
> sudo xcode-select -switch /Applications/Xcode.app/Contents/Developer
> 
> (this also tells xcodebuild where it is)
> 
> We stopped hardcoding the path to Xcode because Apple provides
> mechanisms to look it up, and because it is relocatable as of version 4.3.2.
> 
> 
> Also, I'll cc the maintainer, since on 10.7 it seems like we don't need
> a versioned dependency on xcode, and maybe the package could be built
> with just the command-line tools?
> -- 
> Alexander Hansen, Ph.D.
> Fink User Liaison
> http://finkakh.wordpress.com/2012/02/21/got-job/

-
 Attila Krasznahorkay  attila.krasznahor...@cern.ch
 New York University  Phone: +41-22-76 77368
 The ATLAS Collaboration Room: 32-S-A19
-



--
Live Security Virtual Conference
Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and 
threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions 
will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware 
threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/
___
Fink-users mailing list
Fink-users@lists.sourceforge.net
List archive:
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.os.macosx.fink.user
Subscription management:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users

Re: [Fink-users] fink update-all fails on 10.7.4

[Alexander Hansen]

On 5/15/12 7:06 AM, Jack Howarth wrote:

>> What it's about is that Fink needs to be told where your Xcode
>> application actually is:
>>
>> sudo xcode-select -switch /Applications/Xcode.app/Contents/Developer
>>
>> (this also tells xcodebuild where it is)
>>
>> We stopped hardcoding the path to Xcode because Apple provides
>> mechanisms to look it up, and because it is relocatable as of version 4.3.2.
> 
> Shouldn't fink (or at least the invocation of the xcode dependency) abort 
> with 
> a clear error message if 'xcode-select -print-path' is unset on 10.7 or later?
> I thought that feature was already added to the current fink.
> 

Nope.  If 'xcode-select -print-path' is unset or wrong then the 'xcode'
virtual package is not "installed".  At least for now the command-line
tools like make, clang, ... all work regardless of that setting.

>>
>>
>> Also, I'll cc the maintainer, since on 10.7 it seems like we don't need
>> a versioned dependency on xcode, and maybe the package could be built
>> with just the command-line tools?
> 
> This is present to insure a cctools which is sufficiently new to avoid
> testsuite regresions. Perhaps the xcode virtual package check could be
> modified to just look at the command-line tools. I am assuming that just
> having the command line tools installed is insufficient for 'xcodebuild 
> -version'
> to report its version, right? I wonder if we could look at the receipt for
> the command line tools installation in order to get the xcode version?
> 

The 'xcode' virtual package grabs the version from Xcode.app's
Info.plist, and therefore it has always returned the version of
Xcode.app.  Of course, until Xcode 4.3.x this also mapped directly into
information about the command-line tools.


-- 
Alexander Hansen, Ph.D.
Fink User Liaison
http://finkakh.wordpress.com/2012/02/21/got-job/

--
Live Security Virtual Conference
Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and 
threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions 
will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware 
threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/
___
Fink-users mailing list
Fink-users@lists.sourceforge.net
List archive:
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.os.macosx.fink.user
Subscription management:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users

Re: [Fink-users] fink update-all will not temporarely remove gcc46

[Alexander Hansen]

On 5/15/12 2:24 PM, Gerfried Kumbartzki wrote:
> I operate two Mac systems an iMAc and a MacBook Pro, both have the same 
> system and should be up to date. Both systems have fink installed. The iMac 
> (Xcode 4.1) finished the fink selfupdate 
> and fink update all nicely:
> tulip:~ fink --version
> Package manager version: 0.32.6
> Distribution version: selfupdate-cvs Wed May  9 12:03:03 2012, 10.7, x86_64
> Trees: local/main stable/main stable/crypto unstable/main unstable/crypto 
> local/injected
> 
> MacBook Pro:
> 
> Package manager version: 0.32.6
> Distribution version: selfupdate-cvs Tue May 15 15:27:09 2012, 10.7, x86_64
> Trees: local/main stable/main stable/crypto unstable/main unstable/crypto 
> local/injected
> 
> I upgraded to Xcode 4.3.2 after the first update-all failure
> 
> merlot:~ fink scanpackages
> Password:
> Updating the list of locally available binary packages.
> Scanning dists/local/main/binary-darwin-x86_64
> Scanning dists/stable/main/binary-darwin-x86_64
> Scanning dists/stable/crypto/binary-darwin-x86_64
> Scanning dists/unstable/main/binary-darwin-x86_64
> Scanning dists/unstable/crypto/binary-darwin-x86_64
> Scanning dists/local/injected/binary-darwin-x86_64
> 
> 



> The following packages must be temporarily removed, but there are no .debs to
> restore them from:
>   gcc46
> Updating the list of locally available binary packages.
> Scanning dists/stable/main/binary-darwin-x86_64
> New package: 
> dists/stable/main/binary-darwin-x86_64/libs/perlmods/cpan-meta-yaml-pm_0.008-1_darwin-x86_64.deb
> Exiting with failure.
> 

A workaround is just to run "fink remove gcc46" yourself.

> This was not the first attempt, so few  New packages were created before.
> 
> This is locally on the MacBook Pro.
> merlot:/sw/fink/dists/stable/main/binary-darwin-x86_64/languages 
> total 453104
> drwxr-xr-x  10 root  admin340 May 15 13:42 ./
> drwxr-xr-x  14 root  admin476 May 15 14:34 ../
> -rw-r--r--   1 root  admin 349780 May 15 13:42 
> f2c_20090414-2_darwin-x86_64.deb
> -rw-r--r--   1 root  admin  138115384 Jul 26  2011 
> gcc46-compiler_4.6.1-1000_darwin-x86_64.deb
> -rw-r--r--   1 root  admin   33219166 Jul 26  2011 
> gcc46-shlibs_4.6.1-1000_darwin-x86_64.deb
> -rw-r--r--   1 root  admin  13722 Jul 26  2011 
> gcc46_4.6.1-1000_darwin-x86_64.deb
> -rw-r--r--   1 root  admin   56738740 Jul 26  2011 
> ocaml_3.12.1-1_darwin-x86_64.deb
> -rw-r--r--   1 root  admin1181786 Jul 26  2011 
> tcltk-dev_8.5.10-1_darwin-x86_64.deb
> -rw-r--r--   1 root  admin1181534 Jul 26  2011 
> tcltk-shlibs_8.5.10-1_darwin-x86_64.deb
> -rw-r--r--   1 root  admin1170964 Jul 26  2011 
> tcltk_8.5.10-1_darwin-x86_64.deb
> 

That's an older version of gcc46 than the current one
(gcc46-4.6.3-1000).  If you currently have gcc46-4.6.3-1000 installed
then fink won't install gcc46-4.6.1-1000.

> Another question i have, is it helpful to copy the new debs packages from  
> system to the other
> to shorten the update process?
> 

Sure, that's fine, since both systems are of the same architecture.

> As always I'm very grateful for your help
> 
> Gerfried
> 
> Dr. Gerfried Kumbartzki
> Department of Physics Rutgers University
> voice: 732 445 5500 ext.8498
> fax: 732 445 4343
> 
> 


-- 
Alexander Hansen, Ph.D.
Fink User Liaison
http://finkakh.wordpress.com/2012/02/21/got-job/

--
Live Security Virtual Conference
Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and 
threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions 
will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware 
threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/
___
Fink-users mailing list
Fink-users@lists.sourceforge.net
List archive:
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.os.macosx.fink.user
Subscription management:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users

Re: [Fink-users] fink update-all fails on 10.7.4

[Jack Howarth]

On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 06:40:14AM -0700, Alexander Hansen wrote:
> On 5/15/12 12:25 AM, Attila Krasznahorkay wrote:
> > Dear All,
> > 
> > I've updated my laptop to MacOS X 10.7.4 yesterday. Since then, when I do:
> > 
> > fink selfupdate
> > fink update-all
> > 
> > I get the following answer (after the second call, the first one goes 
> > through okay):
> > 
> > Information about 4756 packages read in 1 seconds.
> > Can't resolve dependency "xcode (>= 3.1.2)" for package "gcc47-4.7.0-1001" 
> > (no matching packages/versions found)
> > Exiting with failure.
> > 
> > Of course I didn't remove my Xcode installation with the update. I still 
> > have version 4.3.2 (I believe the newest one) installed under 
> > /Applications/.
> > 
> > Anyone know what this is about?
> > 
> > Cheers,
> >   Attila
> > 
> > -
> >  Attila Krasznahorkay  attila.krasznahor...@cern.ch
> >  New York University  Phone: +41-22-76 77368
> >  The ATLAS Collaboration Room: 32-S-A19
> > -
> > 
> > 
> > 
> 
> What it's about is that Fink needs to be told where your Xcode
> application actually is:
> 
> sudo xcode-select -switch /Applications/Xcode.app/Contents/Developer
> 
> (this also tells xcodebuild where it is)
> 
> We stopped hardcoding the path to Xcode because Apple provides
> mechanisms to look it up, and because it is relocatable as of version 4.3.2.

Shouldn't fink (or at least the invocation of the xcode dependency) abort with 
a clear error message if 'xcode-select -print-path' is unset on 10.7 or later?
I thought that feature was already added to the current fink.

> 
> 
> Also, I'll cc the maintainer, since on 10.7 it seems like we don't need
> a versioned dependency on xcode, and maybe the package could be built
> with just the command-line tools?

This is present to insure a cctools which is sufficiently new to avoid
testsuite regresions. Perhaps the xcode virtual package check could be
modified to just look at the command-line tools. I am assuming that just
having the command line tools installed is insufficient for 'xcodebuild 
-version'
to report its version, right? I wonder if we could look at the receipt for
the command line tools installation in order to get the xcode version?

> -- 
> Alexander Hansen, Ph.D.
> Fink User Liaison
> http://finkakh.wordpress.com/2012/02/21/got-job/

--
Live Security Virtual Conference
Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and 
threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions 
will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware 
threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/
___
Fink-users mailing list
Fink-users@lists.sourceforge.net
List archive:
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.os.macosx.fink.user
Subscription management:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users

Re: [Fink-users] fink update-all fails on 10.7.4

[Alexander Hansen]

On 5/15/12 12:25 AM, Attila Krasznahorkay wrote:
> Dear All,
> 
> I've updated my laptop to MacOS X 10.7.4 yesterday. Since then, when I do:
> 
> fink selfupdate
> fink update-all
> 
> I get the following answer (after the second call, the first one goes through 
> okay):
> 
> Information about 4756 packages read in 1 seconds.
> Can't resolve dependency "xcode (>= 3.1.2)" for package "gcc47-4.7.0-1001" 
> (no matching packages/versions found)
> Exiting with failure.
> 
> Of course I didn't remove my Xcode installation with the update. I still have 
> version 4.3.2 (I believe the newest one) installed under /Applications/.
> 
> Anyone know what this is about?
> 
> Cheers,
>   Attila
> 
> -
>  Attila Krasznahorkay  attila.krasznahor...@cern.ch
>  New York University  Phone: +41-22-76 77368
>  The ATLAS Collaboration Room: 32-S-A19
> -
> 
> 
> 

What it's about is that Fink needs to be told where your Xcode
application actually is:

sudo xcode-select -switch /Applications/Xcode.app/Contents/Developer

(this also tells xcodebuild where it is)

We stopped hardcoding the path to Xcode because Apple provides
mechanisms to look it up, and because it is relocatable as of version 4.3.2.


Also, I'll cc the maintainer, since on 10.7 it seems like we don't need
a versioned dependency on xcode, and maybe the package could be built
with just the command-line tools?
-- 
Alexander Hansen, Ph.D.
Fink User Liaison
http://finkakh.wordpress.com/2012/02/21/got-job/

--
Live Security Virtual Conference
Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and 
threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions 
will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware 
threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/
___
Fink-users mailing list
Fink-users@lists.sourceforge.net
List archive:
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.os.macosx.fink.user
Subscription management:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users

Re: [Fink-users] fink update-all

[Kopinjol Baishya]

Thanks Robert,

It works now!

thanks again,
kopinjol

On Fri, Dec 25, 2009 at 1:48 PM, Robert Wyatt wrote:

> Kopinjol Baishya wrote:
>
>>
>> Can't resolve dependency "xcode (>= 3.1.2)"
>>
>
> That would most likely be because you don't have Xcode 3.1.2 installed.
> Since gcc44 requires that version of Xcode to build, you'll have to
> download and install that. (From the Apple developer site which has free
> registration.)
>
--
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Verizon Developer Community
Take advantage of Verizon's best-in-class app development support
A streamlined, 14 day to market process makes app distribution fast and easy
Join now and get one step closer to millions of Verizon customers
http://p.sf.net/sfu/verizon-dev2dev ___
Fink-users mailing list
Fink-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users

Re: [Fink-users] fink update-all

[Robert Wyatt]

Kopinjol Baishya wrote:
>
> Can't resolve dependency "xcode (>= 3.1.2)"

That would most likely be because you don't have Xcode 3.1.2 installed.
Since gcc44 requires that version of Xcode to build, you'll have to 
download and install that. (From the Apple developer site which has free 
registration.)

--
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Verizon Developer Community
Take advantage of Verizon's best-in-class app development support
A streamlined, 14 day to market process makes app distribution fast and easy
Join now and get one step closer to millions of Verizon customers
http://p.sf.net/sfu/verizon-dev2dev 
___
Fink-users mailing list
Fink-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users

Re: [Fink-users] Fink update all failed compiling gcc 4.4.4

[Alexander Hansen]

Kingston Mail Server wrote:
> While updating fink, I received this error:
>
> Failed: phase compiling: gcc44-4.4.1-1000 failed
>
>   
That's not actually the error; that's a symptom of the error.  Literally
every possible failure mode during the compile phase will produce this. 
Your error is noted below.


> System: 10.5.8 MacPro Quad core. 10 GB Main Memory 3.5 TB Disks
>
> Any suggestions would surely be appreciated.
>
> Fred
>
> Here is the partial dump:
>
>   

> ld: absolute addressing (perhaps -mdynamic-no-pic) used in  
> ___gmpn_add_n from /usr/local/lib/libgmp.a(add_n.o) not allowed in  
> slidable image. Use '-read_only_relocs suppress' to enable text relocs
> collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
>   
You have a third-party gmp in /usr/local which isn't compatible with our
gcc44.  As per our FAQ:

http://www.finkproject.org/faq/comp-general.php?phpLang=en#usr-local-libs

you can /usr/local out of the way while you build gcc44 to solve this.

--
Come build with us! The BlackBerry® Developer Conference in SF, CA
is the only developer event you need to attend this year. Jumpstart your
developing skills, take BlackBerry mobile applications to market and stay 
ahead of the curve. Join us from November 9-12, 2009. Register now!
http://p.sf.net/sfu/devconf
___
Fink-users mailing list
Fink-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users

Re: [Fink-users] fink update-all fails with Internal error

[Alexander Hansen]

On Jan 12, 2009, at 9:54 PM, Chris Beamis wrote:

Thanks Martin, I got a little bit further.  Now it's trying to load  
an HTML package that doesn't appear to exist anywhere..


curl: (22) The requested URL returned error: 404
### execution of curl failed, exit code 22
Downloading the file "HTML-Tagset-3.03.tar.gz" failed.

(1) Give up
(2) Retry the same mirror
(3) Retry another mirror from your country
(4) Retry another mirror from your continent
(5) Retry another mirror

Default answer will be chosen in 120 seconds...
How do you want to proceed? [5] 5
curl --connect-timeout 30 -f -L -A 'fink/0.28.5' -O 
http://cpan.ulak.net.tr/authors/id/S/SB/SBURKE/HTML-Tagset-3.03.tar.gz
  % Total% Received % Xferd  Average Speed   TimeTime  
Time  Current
 Dload  Upload   Total   Spent 
Left  Speed
  0 00 00 0  0  0 --:--:--  0:00:59  
--:--:-- 0

curl: (22) The requested URL returned error: 404
### execution of curl failed, exit code 22
Downloading the file "HTML-Tagset-3.03.tar.gz" failed.



I've tried this with many many mirrors and they all fail.


I found this in the fink list, but it isn't installed:


html-tagset-pm  3.03-2  Perl module, data tables useful in  
HTML



What should I do?
Thanks,
chris




The answer is:  don't use the original mirrors.  Use one of ours  
instead.  It looks like those aren't turned on in your setup, though.   
What does the MirrorOrder field in /sw/etc/fink.conf say?  If it says  
MasterNever, then you'll want to run "fink configure" and go through  
all the way through the steps--including changing the mirrors.  Then  
select "Master mirrors first" when that comes up.--
This SF.net email is sponsored by:
SourcForge Community
SourceForge wants to tell your story.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/sf-spreadtheword___
Fink-users mailing list
Fink-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users

Re: [Fink-users] fink update-all fails with Internal error

[Chris Beamis]

Thanks Martin, I got a little bit further.  Now it's trying to load  
an HTML package that doesn't appear to exist anywhere..


curl: (22) The requested URL returned error: 404
### execution of curl failed, exit code 22
Downloading the file "HTML-Tagset-3.03.tar.gz" failed.

(1) Give up
(2) Retry the same mirror
(3) Retry another mirror from your country
(4) Retry another mirror from your continent
(5) Retry another mirror

Default answer will be chosen in 120 seconds...
How do you want to proceed? [5] 5
curl --connect-timeout 30 -f -L -A 'fink/0.28.5' -O http:// 
cpan.ulak.net.tr/authors/id/S/SB/SBURKE/HTML-Tagset-3.03.tar.gz
  % Total% Received % Xferd  Average Speed   TimeTime  
Time  Current
 Dload  Upload   Total   Spent 
Left  Speed
  0 00 00 0  0  0 --:--:--  0:00:59  
--:--:-- 0

curl: (22) The requested URL returned error: 404
### execution of curl failed, exit code 22
Downloading the file "HTML-Tagset-3.03.tar.gz" failed.



I've tried this with many many mirrors and they all fail.


I found this in the fink list, but it isn't installed:


html-tagset-pm  3.03-2  Perl module, data tables useful in HTML


What should I do?
Thanks,
chris




On Jan 3, 2009, at 11:17 PM, Martin Costabel wrote:


Chris Beamis wrote:


I'm having an issue which may or may not be related to the rsync
error on the list


I don't think so.


(I haven't updated fink for quite a while):


This could be more to the point...


Sat Jan  3 19:58:20 PST 2009
bea...@wormwood:~ >fink selfupdate
rsync -az -q  rsync://msn.wi.us.finkmirrors.net/finkinfo//TIMESTAMP /
sw/fink/TIMESTAMP.tmp
I will now run the rsync command to retrieve the latest package
descriptions.
rsync -rtz --delete-after --delete -q   --include='10.4/' --
include='10.4/stable/' --include='10.4/stable/main/' --include='10.4/
stable/main/finkinfo/' --include='10.4/stable/main/finkinfo/*/' --
include='10.4/stable/main/finkinfo/*' --include='10.4/stable/main/
finkinfo/**/*' --include='10.4/' --include='10.4/stable/' --
include='10.4/stable/crypto/' --include='10.4/stable/crypto/
finkinfo/' --include='10.4/stable/crypto/finkinfo/*/' -- 
include='10.4/

stable/crypto/finkinfo/*' --include='10.4/stable/crypto/finkinfo/**/
*' --include='VERSION' --include='DISTRIBUTION' --include='README' --
exclude='**' 'rsync://msn.wi.us.finkmirrors.net/finkinfo' '/sw/fink/'
Scanning package description files..
Information about 4370 packages read in 4 seconds.
No packages to install.


This is all normal. The rsync mirrors all work (at least for me), and
they are up to date as of 14 hours ago, when they all stopped updating
(except for the Japanese mirror, which is up-to-date as of 15  
minutes ago).


Thus, business as usual for the mirrors :-(


The core packages have been updated. You should now update the other
packages using commands like 'fink update-all'.

bea...@wormwood:~ >fink update-all
Information about 4370 packages read in 2 seconds.
Failed: Internal error: node for openssl097 already exists


FAQ#6.8 says:

"To fix it:
  Remove the offending package by force, e. g.
  sudo dpkg -r --force-all system-xfree86
"
here of course, openssl097.

--
Martin



-- 


___
Fink-users mailing list
Fink-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users


"Lisa, if you don't like your job, you don't strike. You just go in  
every

day and do it really half-assed.
   That's the American way."

   ~ Homer in "The Simpsons"

--
This SF.net email is sponsored by:
SourcForge Community
SourceForge wants to tell your story.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/sf-spreadtheword___
Fink-users mailing list
Fink-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users

Re: [Fink-users] fink update-all fails with Internal error

[Martin Costabel]

Chris Beamis wrote:
> 
> I'm having an issue which may or may not be related to the rsync  
> error on the list 

I don't think so.

> (I haven't updated fink for quite a while):

This could be more to the point...

> Sat Jan  3 19:58:20 PST 2009
> bea...@wormwood:~ >fink selfupdate
> rsync -az -q  rsync://msn.wi.us.finkmirrors.net/finkinfo//TIMESTAMP / 
> sw/fink/TIMESTAMP.tmp
> I will now run the rsync command to retrieve the latest package  
> descriptions.
> rsync -rtz --delete-after --delete -q   --include='10.4/' -- 
> include='10.4/stable/' --include='10.4/stable/main/' --include='10.4/ 
> stable/main/finkinfo/' --include='10.4/stable/main/finkinfo/*/' -- 
> include='10.4/stable/main/finkinfo/*' --include='10.4/stable/main/ 
> finkinfo/**/*' --include='10.4/' --include='10.4/stable/' -- 
> include='10.4/stable/crypto/' --include='10.4/stable/crypto/ 
> finkinfo/' --include='10.4/stable/crypto/finkinfo/*/' --include='10.4/ 
> stable/crypto/finkinfo/*' --include='10.4/stable/crypto/finkinfo/**/ 
> *' --include='VERSION' --include='DISTRIBUTION' --include='README' -- 
> exclude='**' 'rsync://msn.wi.us.finkmirrors.net/finkinfo' '/sw/fink/'
> Scanning package description files..
> Information about 4370 packages read in 4 seconds.
> No packages to install.

This is all normal. The rsync mirrors all work (at least for me), and 
they are up to date as of 14 hours ago, when they all stopped updating 
(except for the Japanese mirror, which is up-to-date as of 15 minutes ago).

Thus, business as usual for the mirrors :-(

> The core packages have been updated. You should now update the other  
> packages using commands like 'fink update-all'.
> 
> bea...@wormwood:~ >fink update-all
> Information about 4370 packages read in 2 seconds.
> Failed: Internal error: node for openssl097 already exists

FAQ#6.8 says:

"To fix it:
  Remove the offending package by force, e. g.
  sudo dpkg -r --force-all system-xfree86
"
here of course, openssl097.

-- 
Martin



--
___
Fink-users mailing list
Fink-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users

Re: [Fink-users] fink update-all

[Alexander Hansen]

On Tuesday 15 July 2008 16:26:54 Felix Frolow wrote:
> This time it is not working
> I updated Fink to the latest version and get :
>
> gcc -L/sw/lib -L/usr/local/lib -force_flat_namespace -o miniperl \
>   miniperlmain.o opmini.o libperl.a -ldl -lm -lutil -lc
> ld: warning in /usr/local/lib/libgcc_s.10.5.dylib, missing required
> architecture i386 in file
> ld: in /usr/local/lib/libgcc_s.1.dylib, missing required architecture
> i386 in file
> collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
> make: *** [miniperl] Error 1
> ### execution of make failed, exit code 2
> Removing runtime build-lock...
> Removing build-lock package...
> /sw/bin/dpkg-lockwait -r fink-buildlock-perl586-5.8.6-7
> (Reading database ... 88703 files and directories currently installed.)
> Removing fink-buildlock-perl586-5.8.6-7 ...
> Failed: phase compiling: perl586-5.8.6-7 failed
>
> which is related to the missing libraries in /usr/local 
> I was sure that Fink is /usr/local independent
> Please advise
>
>
>
>
>
> Dr  Felix Frolow
> Professor of Structural Biology and Biotechnology
> Department of Molecular Microbiology
> and Biotechnology
> Tel Aviv University 69978, Israel
>
> Acta Crystallographica D, co-editor
>
> e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Tel:  ++972-3640-8723
> Fax: ++972-3640-9407
> Cellular:
>
> 

It looks like you have some sort of non-Apple compiler (possibly not even for 
Intel?) in /usr/local.  Try renaming /usr/local temporarily until you're done 
building.  This is a FAQ:

http://www.finkproject.org/faq/comp-general.php#usr-local-libs

Unfortunately, Fink can't be completely independent of /usr/local, because a 
fair number of the the tools used to build packages are hardcoded to look 
there for stuff.  At runtime Fink packages _don't_ care about /usr/local.



signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
-
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge
Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes
Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world
http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/___
Fink-users mailing list
Fink-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users

Re: [Fink-users] fink update-all

[Alexander Hansen]

Felix Frolow wrote:
> I use MacBookPro Intel with Leopard
>
> Issuing fink update-all I get following:
>
> [green233-5:~] mbfrolow% fink update-all
> Information about 7116 packages read in 1 seconds.
> Can't resolve dependency "perl586-core" for package "xml-sax- 
> pm586-0.16-1" (no
> matching packages/versions found)
> Exiting with failure.
>
> Please advise
>
> Dr  Felix Frolow
> Professor of Structural Biology and Biotechnology
> Department of Molecular Microbiology
> and Biotechnology
> Tel Aviv University 69978, Israel
>
> Acta Crystallographica D, co-editor
>
> e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Tel:  ++972-3640-8723
> Fax: ++972-3640-9407
> Cellular:
>
>
>   
perl586-core does exist for 10.5 according to 
http://pdb.finkproject.org/pdb/package.php/perl586-core .  If your 
machine was running 10.4 + Fink and you updated it to 10.5, then you may 
just need to run "fink selfupdate ; fink reinstall fink ; fink selfupdate"

-
Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace.
It's the best place to buy or sell services for
just about anything Open Source.
http://sourceforge.net/services/buy/index.php
___
Fink-users mailing list
Fink-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users

Re: [Fink-users] fink update-all fails in compiling gcc-4.2.3

[Martin Costabel]

Jürgen Lorenz Simon wrote:
[]
> ../../../gcc-4.2.3/libjava/boehm.cc: In function 'void  
> _Jv_RegisterLibForGc(const void*)':
> ../../../gcc-4.2.3/libjava/boehm.cc:670: error: 'Dl_info' was not  
> declared in this scope

Look if you have a file /usr/local/include/dlfcn.h. If yes, remove it.

-- 
Martin


-
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/
___
Fink-users mailing list
Fink-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users

Re: [Fink-users] fink update all fails when updating libsndfile1-1.0.17-2

[Richard E. Miles]

I have tried many times on my intel imac to compile flac from source.  
It stll fails for me. It appers that the code has some code stucture  
format errors.

Richard E. Miles
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



On Feb 21, 2008, at 7:19 PM, Alexander K. Hansen wrote:

> On Wednesday 20 February 2008 06:34:10 am Martin Costabel wrote:
>> Jean-François Mertens wrote:
>> []
>>
>>> Further I find myself with
>>> *i* flac-shlibs 1.1.1-1013  Free lossless audio codec -
>>> shared libs
>>> I seems a conflicts with flac-shlibs was forgotten, or a
>>> corresponding info
>>> file should have stayed.
>>
>> The latter, I think. There are still 6 packages that have a  
>> dependency
>> on flac-shlibs, and apparently not all packages that had their
>> dependency upgraded from flac-shlibs to libflac8 are actually  
>> compatible
>> with the newer version of flac. This needs still some more work.
>
> There would remain the problem that flac-1.1.1-1013 currently won't  
> compile on
> 10.5/PowerPC (danielj verified that it works on Intel):
>
> http://article.gmane.org/gmane.os.apple.fink.general/25458/match=flac
> http://article.gmane.org/gmane.os.apple.fink.general/25334/match=flac
> http://article.gmane.org/gmane.os.apple.fink.general/24747/match=flac
>
> -- 
> Alexander K. Hansen
> akh AT finkproject DOT org
> Fink User Liaison and Documenter
>
> -
> This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
> Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
> http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/
> ___
> Fink-users mailing list
> Fink-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users


-
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/
___
Fink-users mailing list
Fink-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users

Re: [Fink-users] fink update all fails when updating libsndfile1-1.0.17-2

[Alexander K. Hansen]

On Wednesday 20 February 2008 06:34:10 am Martin Costabel wrote:
> Jean-François Mertens wrote:
> []
>
> > Further I find myself with
> > *i* flac-shlibs 1.1.1-1013  Free lossless audio codec -
> > shared libs
> > I seems a conflicts with flac-shlibs was forgotten, or a
> > corresponding info
> > file should have stayed.
>
> The latter, I think. There are still 6 packages that have a dependency
> on flac-shlibs, and apparently not all packages that had their
> dependency upgraded from flac-shlibs to libflac8 are actually compatible
> with the newer version of flac. This needs still some more work.

There would remain the problem that flac-1.1.1-1013 currently won't compile on 
10.5/PowerPC (danielj verified that it works on Intel):

http://article.gmane.org/gmane.os.apple.fink.general/25458/match=flac
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.os.apple.fink.general/25334/match=flac
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.os.apple.fink.general/24747/match=flac

-- 
Alexander K. Hansen
akh AT finkproject DOT org
Fink User Liaison and Documenter

-
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/
___
Fink-users mailing list
Fink-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users

Re: [Fink-users] fink update all fails when updating libsndfile1-1.0.17-2

[Martin Costabel]

Jean-François Mertens wrote:
[]
> Further I find myself with
> *i* flac-shlibs 1.1.1-1013  Free lossless audio codec -  
> shared libs
> I seems a conflicts with flac-shlibs was forgotten, or a  
> corresponding info
> file should have stayed.

The latter, I think. There are still 6 packages that have a dependency 
on flac-shlibs, and apparently not all packages that had their 
dependency upgraded from flac-shlibs to libflac8 are actually compatible 
with the newer version of flac. This needs still some more work.

-- 
Martin


-
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/
___
Fink-users mailing list
Fink-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users

Re: [Fink-users] fink update all fails when updating libsndfile1-1.0.17-2

[Jean-François Mertens]

On 20 Feb 2008, at 01:11, Richard E.Miles wrote:

> I am using intel imac  10.2.5 leopard. I did a update to finkcomander.
> Then did fink selfupdate-sync and then update-all. When it had go to
> linsndfile1-1,0.17-2 it failed. Here is output:
>
> gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I. -I/sw/include -g -O2 -std=gnu99 -W -
> Wall -Wdeclaration-after-statement -Wpointer-arith -Wstrict-prototypes
> -Wmissing-prototypes -Wcast-align -Wcast-qual -Wnested-externs -Wbad-
> function-cast -Wwrite-strings -pipe -fpascal-strings -I/Developer/
> Headers/FlatCarbon -c flac.c  -fno-common -DPIC -o .libs/flac.o
> flac.c:63: error: syntax error before 'FLAC__SeekableStreamDecoder'
> flac.c:63: warning: no semicolon at end of struct or union
> flac.c:64: warning: type defaults to 'int' in declaration of 'fse'
> flac.c:64: warning: data definition has no type or storage class
> flac.c:77: error: syntax error before '}' token
>

Same here (with 10.4), and similar trouble with libtunepimp3 and with  
libxine1
_ even when re-doing those 3 builds with all others updates completed.

For libtunepimp3 :

g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I../.. -I../../include/tunepimp -I../../ 
libltdl -DHAVE_SOCKLEN_T=1 -I/sw/include -Wall -O2 -g -O2 -MT flac.lo  
-MD -MP -MF .deps/flac.Tpo -c flac.cpp  -fno-common -DPIC -o .libs/ 
flac.o
In file included from flac.cpp:41:
flacdecode.h:30:31: error: FLAC/file_decoder.h: No such file or  
directory

For libxine1 :
gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I../.. -I../.. -I../../include -I../../ 
include -I../../src -I../../src/xine-engine -I../../src/xine-engine - 
I../../src/xine-utils -I../../src/input -I../../src/input -I../../lib  
-I../../lib -fno-common -I/sw/lib/freetype219/include/freetype2 -I/sw/ 
lib/freetype219/include -I/usr/X11R6/include -I/sw/include -UHAVE_MMX  
-UHAVE_MMX2 -I/sw/include -mtune=i386 -Os -pipe -fno-strict-aliasing - 
ffast-math -finline-functions -no-cpp-precomp -D_INTL_REDIRECT_MACROS  
-Wall -Wnested-externs -Wcast-align -Wchar-subscripts -Wmissing- 
declarations -Wmissing-prototypes -DNDEBUG -D_REENTRANT - 
D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -DXINE_COMPILE -Wformat=2 -Wno-format-zero- 
length -Wmissing-format-attribute -Wstrict-aliasing=2 -c  
demux_flac.c  -fno-common -DPIC -o .libs/demux_flac.o
demux_flac.c:39:42: error: FLAC/seekable_stream_decoder.h: No such  
file or directory

Indeed neither  seekable_stream_decoder.h  nor  file_decoder.h  are  
to be found in /sw/include/FLAC


Further I find myself with
*i* flac-shlibs 1.1.1-1013  Free lossless audio codec -  
shared libs
I seems a conflicts with flac-shlibs was forgotten, or a  
corresponding info
file should have stayed.


JF Mertens

-
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/
___
Fink-users mailing list
Fink-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users

Re: [Fink-users] fink update-all error due to python24

[Alexander K. Hansen]

Benjamin Melançon wrote:
> Thanks.  By the way, what I'm trying to update is SVN (so that https 
> works).
>
> This is where it all starts:
> fink update-all
>
> fink needs help picking an alternative to satisfy a virtual 
> dependency. The
> candidates:
> (1)python: Interpreted, object-oriented language
> (2)python-nox: Interpreted, object-oriented language
>
> Pick one: [1]
>
> The following 6 packages will be installed or updated:
> bluefish shared-mime-info svn svn-client svn-doc svn-shlibs
> The following 16 additional packages will be installed:
> autoconf automake1.9 db43 intltool python python24 python24-shlibs
> python24-socket ruby ruby18 ruby18-dev ruby18-shlibs swig swig-shlibs
> texi2html xml-parser-pm586
>
> Do you want to continue? [Y/n]
>
> /sw/bin/dpkg-lockwait -i
> /sw/fink/dists/stable/main/binary-darwin-powerpc/libs/db43_4.3.29-1_darwin-powerpc.deb
>  
>
>
> And then it all runs for a long time and apparently successfully until...
>
> gcc -c -fno-strict-aliasing -fno-common -Wno-long-double
> -no-cpp-precomp -mno-fused-madd -DNDEBUG -g -O3 -Wall
> -Wstrict-prototypes -I. -I./Include -I/sw/include  -DPy_BUILD_CORE -o
> Python/mactoolboxglue.o Python/mactoolboxglue.c
> In file included from Python/mactoolboxglue.c:27:
> ./Include/pymactoolbox.h:11:33: error: QuickTime/QuickTime.h: No such
> file or directory
> In file included from Python/mactoolboxglue.c:27:
> ./Include/pymactoolbox.h:137: warning: parameter names (without types)
> in function declaration
> ./Include/pymactoolbox.h:138: error: parse error before 'Track'
>
> ... and then a whole bunch more errors like that.  Is this QuickTime
> error really the reason I can't update Python and so get SVN fully
> working?
>
Yes.  Install the QuickTime SDK from the Xcode Tools.

>
> Package manager version: 0.24.26
> Distribution version: 0.8.0.rsync powerpc
>
You're also using an outdated version of the Fink distribution, which 
means you aren't getting updates anymore.  Check 
http://www.finkproject.org, under the heading "2006-07-24: Reminder: 
"10.4-transitional" Tree Unsupported on August 1st, 2006"

> - ben  ::  http://AgaricDesign.com
>
> On 4/9/07, Alexander K. Hansen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Benjamin Melançon wrote:
>> > Hello helpful fink-users,
>> >
>> > Running self-update seems to work, but when I go to the next step of
>> > getting my packages back up to speed, fink update-all, it eventually
>> > breaks down here with warnings like the last few here and then the
>> > error.  I've been looking around but not finding a cure, any
>> > recommendations?  I'm using Mac OS X 1.4.9.  Thanks!
>> >
>> > Python/mactoolboxglue.c: In function 'OptionalCFURLRefObj_Convert':
>> > Python/mactoolboxglue.c:462: warning: return makes integer from
>> > pointer without a cast
>> > Python/mactoolboxglue.c:462: warning: return makes integer from
>> > pointer without a cast
>> > make: *** [Python/mactoolboxglue.o] Error 1
>> > ### execution of make failed, exit code 2
>> > Removing build lock...
>> > /sw/bin/dpkg-lockwait -r fink-buildlock-python24-2.4.1-102
>> > (Reading database ... 18140 files and directories currently 
>> installed.)
>> > Removing fink-buildlock-python24-2.4.1-102 ...
>> > Failed: phase compiling: python24-2.4.1-102 failed
>> >
>> >
>> Which architecture?
>>
>> Can you provide the last line the compiler tried to run?
>>


-- 
Alexander K. Hansen
Fink User Liaison/Documenter
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
___
Fink-users mailing list
Fink-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users

Re: [Fink-users] fink update-all error due to python24

[Benjamin Melançon]

Thanks.  By the way, what I'm trying to update is SVN (so that https works).

This is where it all starts:
fink update-all

fink needs help picking an alternative to satisfy a virtual dependency. The
candidates:
(1) python: Interpreted, object-oriented language
(2) python-nox: Interpreted, object-oriented language

Pick one: [1]

The following 6 packages will be installed or updated:
 bluefish shared-mime-info svn svn-client svn-doc svn-shlibs
The following 16 additional packages will be installed:
 autoconf automake1.9 db43 intltool python python24 python24-shlibs
 python24-socket ruby ruby18 ruby18-dev ruby18-shlibs swig swig-shlibs
 texi2html xml-parser-pm586

Do you want to continue? [Y/n]

/sw/bin/dpkg-lockwait -i
/sw/fink/dists/stable/main/binary-darwin-powerpc/libs/db43_4.3.29-1_darwin-powerpc.deb

And then it all runs for a long time and apparently successfully until...

gcc -c -fno-strict-aliasing -fno-common -Wno-long-double
-no-cpp-precomp -mno-fused-madd -DNDEBUG -g -O3 -Wall
-Wstrict-prototypes -I. -I./Include -I/sw/include  -DPy_BUILD_CORE -o
Python/mactoolboxglue.o Python/mactoolboxglue.c
In file included from Python/mactoolboxglue.c:27:
./Include/pymactoolbox.h:11:33: error: QuickTime/QuickTime.h: No such
file or directory
In file included from Python/mactoolboxglue.c:27:
./Include/pymactoolbox.h:137: warning: parameter names (without types)
in function declaration
./Include/pymactoolbox.h:138: error: parse error before 'Track'

... and then a whole bunch more errors like that.  Is this QuickTime
error really the reason I can't update Python and so get SVN fully
working?


Package manager version: 0.24.26
Distribution version: 0.8.0.rsync powerpc

- ben  ::  http://AgaricDesign.com

On 4/9/07, Alexander K. Hansen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Benjamin Melançon wrote:
> > Hello helpful fink-users,
> >
> > Running self-update seems to work, but when I go to the next step of
> > getting my packages back up to speed, fink update-all, it eventually
> > breaks down here with warnings like the last few here and then the
> > error.  I've been looking around but not finding a cure, any
> > recommendations?  I'm using Mac OS X 1.4.9.  Thanks!
> >
> > Python/mactoolboxglue.c: In function 'OptionalCFURLRefObj_Convert':
> > Python/mactoolboxglue.c:462: warning: return makes integer from
> > pointer without a cast
> > Python/mactoolboxglue.c:462: warning: return makes integer from
> > pointer without a cast
> > make: *** [Python/mactoolboxglue.o] Error 1
> > ### execution of make failed, exit code 2
> > Removing build lock...
> > /sw/bin/dpkg-lockwait -r fink-buildlock-python24-2.4.1-102
> > (Reading database ... 18140 files and directories currently installed.)
> > Removing fink-buildlock-python24-2.4.1-102 ...
> > Failed: phase compiling: python24-2.4.1-102 failed
> >
> >
> Which architecture?
>
> Can you provide the last line the compiler tried to run?
>
> --
> Alexander K. Hansen
> Fink User Liaison/Documenter
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>

-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
___
Fink-users mailing list
Fink-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users

Re: [Fink-users] fink update-all error due to python24

[Alexander K. Hansen]

Benjamin Melançon wrote:
> Hello helpful fink-users,
>
> Running self-update seems to work, but when I go to the next step of
> getting my packages back up to speed, fink update-all, it eventually
> breaks down here with warnings like the last few here and then the
> error.  I've been looking around but not finding a cure, any
> recommendations?  I'm using Mac OS X 1.4.9.  Thanks!
>
> Python/mactoolboxglue.c: In function 'OptionalCFURLRefObj_Convert':
> Python/mactoolboxglue.c:462: warning: return makes integer from
> pointer without a cast
> Python/mactoolboxglue.c:462: warning: return makes integer from
> pointer without a cast
> make: *** [Python/mactoolboxglue.o] Error 1
> ### execution of make failed, exit code 2
> Removing build lock...
> /sw/bin/dpkg-lockwait -r fink-buildlock-python24-2.4.1-102
> (Reading database ... 18140 files and directories currently installed.)
> Removing fink-buildlock-python24-2.4.1-102 ...
> Failed: phase compiling: python24-2.4.1-102 failed
>
>   
Which architecture?

Can you provide the last line the compiler tried to run? 

-- 
Alexander K. Hansen
Fink User Liaison/Documenter
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
___
Fink-users mailing list
Fink-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users

Re: [Fink-users] fink update-all

[Jean-David Maillefer]

Le 27 sept. 2006 à 00:51, Daniel Macks a écrit :


On Wed, Sep 27, 2006 at 12:35:56AM +0200, Jean-David Maillefer wrote:


If I run update-all with unstable enabled, all the stable packages
having greater unstable version will upgrade to the unstable one.
If I run update-all with unstable disable, only the stable packages
are updated.
How to update all stable to the latest stable version and all
unstable to the latest unstable one ?


1. Disable unstable and update-all.

2. 'fink list -Nt' (I think that's implemented but not documented:(
but if not do 'fink list -it' and grep for '*i*') to determine what
packages are installed that are beyond those present in stable.

3. Enable unstable.

4. 'fink update' those specific packages your learned in step 2.



Thanks for the howto.

To ease the update, I made the following bash script:

#!/bin/bash

# Jean-David Maillefer

fconf=/sw/etc/fink.conf
echo "Checking $fconf for unstable"
if { grep -E '^Trees:.*unstable/' $fconf; }
then
echo "Disabling unstable"
ext=$(date "+%s")
function clean() {
echo "Reactivating unstable."
mv -f "${fconf}"{"$ext",}
fink selfupdate; fink index; fink scanpackages
trap 0
}
mv "${fconf}"{,"$ext"}
trap clean 0
	awk -F' ' '/^Trees:/ {res=$1; for (i=2; i <= NF; ++i) if ($i !~ / 
^unstable\//) res=res" "$i; print res; next} {print}' "${fconf}$ 
{ext}" > "${fconf}"

#less "${fconf}"
echo "  unstable tree(s) disabled."

echo "Reconfiguring database"
fink selfupdate; fink index; fink scanpackages

echo "Updating all stable packages"
fink update-all

# ? fink list -it | grep -E '^( i |\(i\))' | \
unstableToUpdate=$(
fink list -Nt | grep -E '^\*i\*' | \
awk -F '\t' '{print $2}')

# Reactivating unstable
clean

echo "Updating all unstable packages (but no stable to newer unstable)"
if [ -z "$unstableToUpdate" ]
then
echo "No unstable package to update."
else
cmd="fink update $unstableToUpdate"
echo $cmd
eval $cmd
fi
else
echo "  no unstable tree enabled."
echo "Updating all stable packages"
fink update-all
fi
echo "Done."



smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV___
Fink-users mailing list
Fink-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users

Re: [Fink-users] fink update-all

[Daniel Macks]

On Wed, Sep 27, 2006 at 12:35:56AM +0200, Jean-David Maillefer wrote:
> 
> If I run update-all with unstable enabled, all the stable packages  
> having greater unstable version will upgrade to the unstable one.
> If I run update-all with unstable disable, only the stable packages  
> are updated.
> How to update all stable to the latest stable version and all  
> unstable to the latest unstable one ?

1. Disable unstable and update-all.

2. 'fink list -Nt' (I think that's implemented but not documented:(
but if not do 'fink list -it' and grep for '*i*') to determine what
packages are installed that are beyond those present in stable.

3. Enable unstable.

4. 'fink update' those specific packages your learned in step 2.

dan

-- 
Daniel Macks
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.netspace.org/~dmacks


-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
___
Fink-users mailing list
Fink-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users

Re: [Fink-users] fink update-all: xfig won't compile, now gv is broken as well

[Martin Costabel]

Duncan Galloway wrote:
[]

install: xfig.1.html: No such file or directory
make[2]: *** [install.man] Error 71
make[1]: *** [install.doc] Error 2
make: *** [install.all] Error 2
### execution of make failed, exit code 2
Removing build lock...
/sw/bin/dpkg-lockwait -r fink-buildlock-xfig-3.2.4-4
(Reading database ... 47366 files and directories currently installed.)
Removing fink-buildlock-xfig-3.2.4-4 ...
Failed: phase installing: xfig-3.2.4-4 failed

This appears to be very similar with the problem reported earlier this year 
by Stan Sanderson (although curiously, his version is somewhat newer than mine)


"xfig-3.2.5-3 update fails"
Stan Sanderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (2005-06-30 21:42:19 GMT)

I checked the fink-users archive, but no solution was offered. 


This is not true, see 
.


In Stan's case and another more recent one on fink-beginners 
, 
the problem was tracked down to a change that occurred in xfree86-4.5.0. 
Since you have a much older xfree86 installed, it is improbable that 
yours is the same cause.


Another cause for this problem has been a broken rman installation.

Please check the parts of your output indicated in those threads, namely 
after the line


Installing man pages to /sw/share/man/man1

I'm running fink

0.24.10 on a Mac with 10.3.9 and XFree86 4.3.99.16-2. Any ideas?

Also, gv 3.6.1 now seems to be broken. 


What do you mean by "now"? What did you change? The gv executable is 
known to break when xaw3d is updated or when xfree86 is updated without 
rebuilding xaw3d. You visibly did not update xfree86, but did you 
prehaps update xaw3d? What version of xaw3d and of gv do you have installed?


--
Martin



---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files
for problems?  Stop!  Download the new AJAX search engine that makes
searching your log files as easy as surfing the  web.  DOWNLOAD SPLUNK!
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7637&alloc_id=16865&op=click
___
Fink-users mailing list
Fink-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users

Re: [Fink-users] Fink update-all fails due to python

[Christopher Mc Carthy]

I was away for the weekend, and after your messages tried again.  I
somehow found the correct incantation of fink
build/rebuild/update-all/self-update and so was able to update my
system.

Thanks to all; apologies for not replying earlier (time/place/platform
problem...)

Chris

p.s. and OT: will I be able to reply to posts using my usual newsnet
client, or will my posts get held up awaiting authorization?

On 10/4/05, Jeff Whitaker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Martin Costabel wrote:
>
> > Chris wrote:
> > []
> >
> >> Do you want to continue? [Y/n] [...]
> >> Python/mactoolboxglue.c: In function 'CFURLRefObj_Convert':
> >> Python/mactoolboxglue.c:480: warning: return makes integer from
> >> pointer without a cast
> >> Python/mactoolboxglue.c:480: warning: return makes integer from
> >> pointer without a cast
> >> Python/mactoolboxglue.c: In function 'OptionalCFURLRefObj_Convert':
> >> Python/mactoolboxglue.c:481: warning: return makes integer from
> >> pointer without a cast
> >> Python/mactoolboxglue.c:481: warning: return makes integer from
> >> pointer without a cast
> >> make: *** [Python/mactoolboxglue.o] Error 1
> >> ### execution of (export failed, exit code 2
> >> Removing build lock...
> >> /sw/bin/dpkg-lockwait -r fink-buildlock-python22-2.2.3-125
> >> (Reading database ... 93525 files and directories currently installed.)
> >> Removing fink-buildlock-python22-2.2.3-125 ...
> >> Failed: phase compiling: python22-2.2.3-125 failed
> >
> >
> This is now fixed in 10.4-transitional - by adding a BuildConflicts:
> libquicktime0.  Simply removing the libquicktime0 will allow it to build
> without doing a selfupdate.
>
> -Jeff
>
> --
> Jeffrey S. Whitaker Phone : (303)497-6313
> NOAA/OAR/CDC  R/CDC1FAX   : (303)497-6449
> 325 BroadwayWeb   : http://www.cdc.noaa.gov/~jsw
> Boulder, CO, USA 80305-3328 Office: Skaggs Research Cntr 1D-124
>
>


---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by:
Power Architecture Resource Center: Free content, downloads, discussions,
and more. http://solutions.newsforge.com/ibmarch.tmpl
___
Fink-users mailing list
Fink-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users

Re: [Fink-users] Fink update-all fails due to python

[Jeff Whitaker]

Martin Costabel wrote:


Chris wrote:
[]


Do you want to continue? [Y/n] [...]
Python/mactoolboxglue.c: In function 'CFURLRefObj_Convert':
Python/mactoolboxglue.c:480: warning: return makes integer from 
pointer without a cast
Python/mactoolboxglue.c:480: warning: return makes integer from 
pointer without a cast

Python/mactoolboxglue.c: In function 'OptionalCFURLRefObj_Convert':
Python/mactoolboxglue.c:481: warning: return makes integer from 
pointer without a cast
Python/mactoolboxglue.c:481: warning: return makes integer from 
pointer without a cast

make: *** [Python/mactoolboxglue.o] Error 1
### execution of (export failed, exit code 2
Removing build lock...
/sw/bin/dpkg-lockwait -r fink-buildlock-python22-2.2.3-125
(Reading database ... 93525 files and directories currently installed.)
Removing fink-buildlock-python22-2.2.3-125 ...
Failed: phase compiling: python22-2.2.3-125 failed



This is now fixed in 10.4-transitional - by adding a BuildConflicts: 
libquicktime0.  Simply removing the libquicktime0 will allow it to build 
without doing a selfupdate.


-Jeff

--
Jeffrey S. Whitaker Phone : (303)497-6313
NOAA/OAR/CDC  R/CDC1FAX   : (303)497-6449
325 BroadwayWeb   : http://www.cdc.noaa.gov/~jsw
Boulder, CO, USA 80305-3328 Office: Skaggs Research Cntr 1D-124



---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by:
Power Architecture Resource Center: Free content, downloads, discussions,
and more. http://solutions.newsforge.com/ibmarch.tmpl
___
Fink-users mailing list
Fink-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users

Re: [Fink-users] Fink update-all fails due to python

[Martin Costabel]

Chris wrote:
[]
Do you want to continue? [Y/n] 
[...]

Python/mactoolboxglue.c: In function 'CFURLRefObj_Convert':
Python/mactoolboxglue.c:480: warning: return makes integer from pointer 
without a cast
Python/mactoolboxglue.c:480: warning: return makes integer from pointer 
without a cast

Python/mactoolboxglue.c: In function 'OptionalCFURLRefObj_Convert':
Python/mactoolboxglue.c:481: warning: return makes integer from pointer 
without a cast
Python/mactoolboxglue.c:481: warning: return makes integer from pointer 
without a cast

make: *** [Python/mactoolboxglue.o] Error 1
### execution of (export failed, exit code 2
Removing build lock...
/sw/bin/dpkg-lockwait -r fink-buildlock-python22-2.2.3-125
(Reading database ... 93525 files and directories currently installed.)
Removing fink-buildlock-python22-2.2.3-125 ...
Failed: phase compiling: python22-2.2.3-125 failed


Maybe after Sourceforge sat on your message for 3 days, your problem is 
solved now? If not, you would need to show some more lines above those 
you are showing; the real error message is not among them. Show the 
output from the last compiler line on.


--
Martin




---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by:
Power Architecture Resource Center: Free content, downloads, discussions,
and more. http://solutions.newsforge.com/ibmarch.tmpl
___
Fink-users mailing list
Fink-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users

Re: [Fink-users] fink update-all fails on /sw/lib/libsasl2.la

[Richard Cobbe]

On Thu, Apr 21, 2005 at 08:38:27AM -0600, Dave Price wrote:
> Is there a good way to invoke fink update-all to capture my log in a file?

Check out the script utility, included (with manpage) as part of OS X.

Richard


---
SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now.
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click
___
Fink-users mailing list
Fink-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users

Re: [Fink-users] fink update-all fails on /sw/lib/libsasl2.la

[Jean-François Mertens]

On 21 Apr 2005, at 17:25, Jean-François Mertens wrote:
On 21 Apr 2005, at 16:19, David R. Morrison wrote:

That really can't be it, since putting in that dependency would  
force libgda into the crypto tree.


Sorry, the output below is just for libgda-ldap.so .
JF
# otool -L /sw/lib/libgda/providers/libgda-ldap.so /sw/lib/libgda/ 
providers/libgda-xml.so/sw/lib/libgda/providers/libgda-ldap.so:
/sw/lib/libdb-4.2.dylib (compatibility version 4.2.0,  
current version 4.2.52)
/System/Library/Frameworks/Kerberos.framework/Versions/A/ 
Kerberos (compatibility version 5.0.0, current version 5.0.0)
/sw/lib/libcrypto.0.9.7.dylib (compatibility version 0.9.7,  
current version 0.9.7)
/sw/lib/libssl.0.9.7.dylib (compatibility version 0.9.7,  
current version 0.9.7)
/usr/lib/libresolv.9.dylib (compatibility version 1.0.0,  
current version 361.0.0)
/usr/lib/libSystem.B.dylib (compatibility version 1.0.0,  
current version 88.0.0)
/sw/lib/libsasl2.2.dylib (compatibility version 3.0.0,  
current version 3.20.0)
/sw/lib/libgdasql.0.dylib (compatibility version 1.0.0,  
current version 1.0.0)
/sw/lib/libgda-2.1.dylib (compatibility version 3.0.0,  
current version 3.0.0)
/sw/lib/libgobject-2.0.0.dylib (compatibility version  
401.0.0, current version 401.6.0)
/sw/lib/libgthread-2.0.0.dylib (compatibility version  
401.0.0, current version 401.6.0)
/sw/lib/libgmodule-2.0.0.dylib (compatibility version  
401.0.0, current version 401.6.0)
/sw/lib/libglib-2.0.0.dylib (compatibility version 401.0.0,  
current version 401.6.0)
/sw/lib/libintl.3.dylib (compatibility version 8.0.0,  
current version 8.0.0)
/sw/lib/libxslt.1.dylib (compatibility version 3.0.0,  
current version 3.8.0)
/sw/lib/libxml2.2.dylib (compatibility version 9.0.0,  
current version 9.11.0)
/usr/lib/libz.1.dylib (compatibility version 1.0.0, current  
version 1.2.2)
/sw/lib/libiconv.2.dylib (compatibility version 5.0.0,  
current version 5.0.0)
/sw/lib/libldap.2.dylib (compatibility version 3.0.0,  
current version 3.122.0)
/sw/lib/liblber.2.dylib (compatibility version 3.0.0,  
current version 3.122.0)

Jean-François
---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: New Crystal Reports XI.
Version 11 adds new functionality designed to reduce time involved in
creating, integrating, and deploying reporting solutions. Free  
runtime info,
new features, or free trial, at: http://www.businessobjects.com/ 
devxi/728
___
Fink-users mailing list
Fink-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users



---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: New Crystal Reports XI.
Version 11 adds new functionality designed to reduce time involved in
creating, integrating, and deploying reporting solutions. Free runtime info,
new features, or free trial, at: http://www.businessobjects.com/devxi/728
___
Fink-users mailing list
Fink-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users

Re: [Fink-users] fink update-all fails on /sw/lib/libsasl2.la

[Jean-François Mertens]

On 21 Apr 2005, at 16:19, David R. Morrison wrote:
That really can't be it, since putting in that dependency would  
force libgda into the crypto tree.

# otool -L /sw/lib/libgda/providers/libgda-ldap.so /sw/lib/libgda/ 
providers/libgda-xml.so/sw/lib/libgda/providers/libgda-ldap.so:
/sw/lib/libdb-4.2.dylib (compatibility version 4.2.0,  
current version 4.2.52)
/System/Library/Frameworks/Kerberos.framework/Versions/A/ 
Kerberos (compatibility version 5.0.0, current version 5.0.0)
/sw/lib/libcrypto.0.9.7.dylib (compatibility version 0.9.7,  
current version 0.9.7)
/sw/lib/libssl.0.9.7.dylib (compatibility version 0.9.7,  
current version 0.9.7)
/usr/lib/libresolv.9.dylib (compatibility version 1.0.0,  
current version 361.0.0)
/usr/lib/libSystem.B.dylib (compatibility version 1.0.0,  
current version 88.0.0)
/sw/lib/libsasl2.2.dylib (compatibility version 3.0.0,  
current version 3.20.0)
/sw/lib/libgdasql.0.dylib (compatibility version 1.0.0,  
current version 1.0.0)
/sw/lib/libgda-2.1.dylib (compatibility version 3.0.0,  
current version 3.0.0)
/sw/lib/libgobject-2.0.0.dylib (compatibility version  
401.0.0, current version 401.6.0)
/sw/lib/libgthread-2.0.0.dylib (compatibility version  
401.0.0, current version 401.6.0)
/sw/lib/libgmodule-2.0.0.dylib (compatibility version  
401.0.0, current version 401.6.0)
/sw/lib/libglib-2.0.0.dylib (compatibility version 401.0.0,  
current version 401.6.0)
/sw/lib/libintl.3.dylib (compatibility version 8.0.0,  
current version 8.0.0)
/sw/lib/libxslt.1.dylib (compatibility version 3.0.0,  
current version 3.8.0)
/sw/lib/libxml2.2.dylib (compatibility version 9.0.0,  
current version 9.11.0)
/usr/lib/libz.1.dylib (compatibility version 1.0.0, current  
version 1.2.2)
/sw/lib/libiconv.2.dylib (compatibility version 5.0.0,  
current version 5.0.0)
/sw/lib/libldap.2.dylib (compatibility version 3.0.0,  
current version 3.122.0)
/sw/lib/liblber.2.dylib (compatibility version 3.0.0,  
current version 3.122.0)

Jean-François
---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: New Crystal Reports XI.
Version 11 adds new functionality designed to reduce time involved in
creating, integrating, and deploying reporting solutions. Free runtime info,
new features, or free trial, at: http://www.businessobjects.com/devxi/728
___
Fink-users mailing list
Fink-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users

Re: [Fink-users] fink update-all fails on /sw/lib/libsasl2.la

[Alexander Hansen]

On Apr 21, 2005, at 10:38 AM, Dave Price wrote:
Is there a good way to invoke fink update-all to capture my log in  
a file?

aloha,
dave
If I'm using the OS X Terminal application, I typically just set the  
Preferences for infinite scrollback and then save the output as a  
quick and dirty way.

Otherwise, you could do
fink update-all | tee > updateall.log 2>&1
"tee" lets you see the output as well as writing the log file.
On 4/21/05, David R. Morrison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
That really can't be it, since putting in that dependency would force
libgda into the crypto tree.
I think we need to see more lines from your log, to find out the  
source
of this.

   -- Dave
On Apr 21, 2005, at 9:44 AM, Alexander K. Hansen wrote:

On Apr 21, 2005, at 12:44 AM, Dave Price wrote:

I am trying to update my fink and fail here:
grep: /sw/lib/libsasl2.la: No such file or directory
sed: /sw/lib/libsasl2.la: No such file or directory
libtool: link: `/sw/lib/libsasl2.la' is not a valid libtool archive
make[2]: *** [libgda-ldap.la] Error 1
make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
make: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
### execution of make failed, exit code 2
Failed: compiling libgda-1.0.4-3 failed
Any clues to a fix or workaround?
aloha,
dave

Yup--  looks to me like a missing build-dependency on cyrus-sasl2- 
dev
(maintainer cc'ed)

--
Alexander K. Hansen
Associate Research Scientist, Columbia University
visiting MIT Plasma Science and Fusion Center
Levitated Dipole Experiment
175 Albany Street, NW17-219
Cambridge, MA  02139-4213



---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: New Crystal Reports XI.
Version 11 adds new functionality designed to reduce time involved in
creating, integrating, and deploying reporting solutions. Free  
runtime info,
new features, or free trial, at: http://www.businessobjects.com/ 
devxi/728
___
Fink-users mailing list
Fink-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users


---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: New Crystal Reports XI.
Version 11 adds new functionality designed to reduce time involved in
creating, integrating, and deploying reporting solutions. Free runtime info,
new features, or free trial, at: http://www.businessobjects.com/devxi/728
___
Fink-users mailing list
Fink-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users

Re: [Fink-users] fink update-all fails on /sw/lib/libsasl2.la

[Dave Price]

Is there a good way to invoke fink update-all to capture my log in a file?

aloha,
dave

On 4/21/05, David R. Morrison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> That really can't be it, since putting in that dependency would force
> libgda into the crypto tree.
> 
> I think we need to see more lines from your log, to find out the source
> of this.
> 
>-- Dave
> 
> On Apr 21, 2005, at 9:44 AM, Alexander K. Hansen wrote:
> 
> >
> > On Apr 21, 2005, at 12:44 AM, Dave Price wrote:
> >
> >> I am trying to update my fink and fail here:
> >>
> >> grep: /sw/lib/libsasl2.la: No such file or directory
> >> sed: /sw/lib/libsasl2.la: No such file or directory
> >> libtool: link: `/sw/lib/libsasl2.la' is not a valid libtool archive
> >> make[2]: *** [libgda-ldap.la] Error 1
> >> make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
> >> make: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
> >> ### execution of make failed, exit code 2
> >> Failed: compiling libgda-1.0.4-3 failed
> >>
> >> Any clues to a fix or workaround?
> >>
> >> aloha,
> >> dave
> >>
> >>
> >
> > Yup--  looks to me like a missing build-dependency on cyrus-sasl2-dev
> > (maintainer cc'ed)
> >
> > --
> > Alexander K. Hansen
> > Associate Research Scientist, Columbia University
> > visiting MIT Plasma Science and Fusion Center
> > Levitated Dipole Experiment
> > 175 Albany Street, NW17-219
> > Cambridge, MA  02139-4213
> 
>


---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: New Crystal Reports XI.
Version 11 adds new functionality designed to reduce time involved in
creating, integrating, and deploying reporting solutions. Free runtime info,
new features, or free trial, at: http://www.businessobjects.com/devxi/728
___
Fink-users mailing list
Fink-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users

Re: [Fink-users] fink update-all fails on /sw/lib/libsasl2.la

[David R. Morrison]

That really can't be it, since putting in that dependency would force 
libgda into the crypto tree.

I think we need to see more lines from your log, to find out the source 
of this.

  -- Dave
On Apr 21, 2005, at 9:44 AM, Alexander K. Hansen wrote:
On Apr 21, 2005, at 12:44 AM, Dave Price wrote:
I am trying to update my fink and fail here:
grep: /sw/lib/libsasl2.la: No such file or directory
sed: /sw/lib/libsasl2.la: No such file or directory
libtool: link: `/sw/lib/libsasl2.la' is not a valid libtool archive
make[2]: *** [libgda-ldap.la] Error 1
make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
make: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
### execution of make failed, exit code 2
Failed: compiling libgda-1.0.4-3 failed
Any clues to a fix or workaround?
aloha,
dave

Yup--  looks to me like a missing build-dependency on cyrus-sasl2-dev 
(maintainer cc'ed)

--
Alexander K. Hansen
Associate Research Scientist, Columbia University
visiting MIT Plasma Science and Fusion Center
Levitated Dipole Experiment
175 Albany Street, NW17-219
Cambridge, MA  02139-4213

---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: New Crystal Reports XI.
Version 11 adds new functionality designed to reduce time involved in
creating, integrating, and deploying reporting solutions. Free runtime info,
new features, or free trial, at: http://www.businessobjects.com/devxi/728
___
Fink-users mailing list
Fink-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users

Re: [Fink-users] fink update-all fails on /sw/lib/libsasl2.la

[Alexander K. Hansen]

On Apr 21, 2005, at 12:44 AM, Dave Price wrote:
I am trying to update my fink and fail here:
grep: /sw/lib/libsasl2.la: No such file or directory
sed: /sw/lib/libsasl2.la: No such file or directory
libtool: link: `/sw/lib/libsasl2.la' is not a valid libtool archive
make[2]: *** [libgda-ldap.la] Error 1
make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
make: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
### execution of make failed, exit code 2
Failed: compiling libgda-1.0.4-3 failed
Any clues to a fix or workaround?
aloha,
dave

Yup--  looks to me like a missing build-dependency on cyrus-sasl2-dev 
(maintainer cc'ed)

--
Alexander K. Hansen
Associate Research Scientist, Columbia University
visiting MIT Plasma Science and Fusion Center
Levitated Dipole Experiment
175 Albany Street, NW17-219
Cambridge, MA  02139-4213

---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: New Crystal Reports XI.
Version 11 adds new functionality designed to reduce time involved in
creating, integrating, and deploying reporting solutions. Free runtime info,
new features, or free trial, at: http://www.businessobjects.com/devxi/728
___
Fink-users mailing list
Fink-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users

Re: [Fink-users] fink update-all stops files at control-center

[Curtis Vaughan]

Ah--totally forgot (hate it when that happens)!  These are the -dev 
and -shlibs for GNOME 1.4 control-center, which are needed by 
something else (maybe).

You might try removing control-center-dev and control-center-shlibs.  
If nothing complains, then you may not need them for anything and then 
you can go about your update-all.

That did it!!! Thanks

---
SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now.
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click
___
Fink-users mailing list
Fink-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users

Re: [Fink-users] fink update-all stops files at control-center

[Alexander K. Hansen]

On Apr 5, 2005, at 3:34 PM, Curtis Vaughan wrote:
On 5 avr. 05, at 11:45, Alexander K. Hansen wrote:
On Apr 5, 2005, at 2:36 PM, Curtis Vaughan wrote:

What version of OSX do you have?  and What version of fink do you 
have ("fink --version")?

If you're on Panther (as is suggested by the -17 revision) I'm very 
surprised that you can't get a later version:

http://fink.sourceforge.net/pdb/package.php/control-center
Of course I'm on Jaquar (10.3.8) and fink --version gives:
10.3.8 is Panther :-)
What an idiot I am!!!  Right, Panther. Just keep waiting for Tiger

Package manager version: 0.24.2
Distribution version: 0.7.1.rsync

0.24.2 is a fine, reliable version of Fink..  I can't fathom why 
update-all wants to install that version of control-center, then, 
rather than the _latest_ available one.

And "fink list control-center"  lists 1.4.0.5-17 as the most recent 
available version?

fink list control-center gives:
Information about 4795 packages read in 28 seconds.
 control-center   2.6.1-10 The Gnome control center
(i)  control-cent...  1.4.0.5-17   GNOME Control Center
(i)  control-cent...  1.4.0.5-17   GNOME Control Center
 control-cent...  2.6.1-10 The Gnome control center
 i   control-cent...  2.6.1-10 The Gnome control center

Ah--totally forgot (hate it when that happens)!  These are the -dev and 
-shlibs for GNOME 1.4 control-center, which are needed by something 
else (maybe).

You might try removing control-center-dev and control-center-shlibs.  
If nothing complains, then you may not need them for anything and then 
you can go about your update-all.

--
Alexander Hansen
Fink Documentarian
[Day Job] Levitated Dipole Experiment
http://www.psfc.mit.edu/LDX

---
SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now.
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click
___
Fink-users mailing list
Fink-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users

Re: [Fink-users] fink update-all stops files at control-center

[Curtis Vaughan]

On 5 avr. 05, at 11:45, Alexander K. Hansen wrote:
On Apr 5, 2005, at 2:36 PM, Curtis Vaughan wrote:

What version of OSX do you have?  and What version of fink do you 
have ("fink --version")?

If you're on Panther (as is suggested by the -17 revision) I'm very 
surprised that you can't get a later version:

http://fink.sourceforge.net/pdb/package.php/control-center
Of course I'm on Jaquar (10.3.8) and fink --version gives:
10.3.8 is Panther :-)
What an idiot I am!!!  Right, Panther. Just keep waiting for Tiger

Package manager version: 0.24.2
Distribution version: 0.7.1.rsync

0.24.2 is a fine, reliable version of Fink..  I can't fathom why 
update-all wants to install that version of control-center, then, 
rather than the _latest_ available one.

And "fink list control-center"  lists 1.4.0.5-17 as the most recent 
available version?

fink list control-center gives:
Information about 4795 packages read in 28 seconds.
 control-center   2.6.1-10 The Gnome control center
(i)  control-cent...  1.4.0.5-17   GNOME Control Center
(i)  control-cent...  1.4.0.5-17   GNOME Control Center
 control-cent...  2.6.1-10 The Gnome control center
 i   control-cent...  2.6.1-10 The Gnome control center

---
SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now.
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click
___
Fink-users mailing list
Fink-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users

Re: [Fink-users] fink update-all stops files at control-center

[Alexander K. Hansen]

On Apr 5, 2005, at 2:36 PM, Curtis Vaughan wrote:

What version of OSX do you have?  and What version of fink do you 
have ("fink --version")?

If you're on Panther (as is suggested by the -17 revision) I'm very 
surprised that you can't get a later version:

http://fink.sourceforge.net/pdb/package.php/control-center
Of course I'm on Jaquar (10.3.8) and fink --version gives:
10.3.8 is Panther :-)
Package manager version: 0.24.2
Distribution version: 0.7.1.rsync

0.24.2 is a fine, reliable version of Fink..  I can't fathom why 
update-all wants to install that version of control-center, then, 
rather than the _latest_ available one.

And "fink list control-center"  lists 1.4.0.5-17 as the most recent 
available version?

--
Alexander Hansen
Fink Documentarian
[Day Job] Levitated Dipole Experiment
http://www.psfc.mit.edu/LDX

---
SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now.
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click
___
Fink-users mailing list
Fink-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users

Re: [Fink-users] fink update-all stops files at control-center

[Curtis Vaughan]

On 5 avr. 05, at 11:21, Alexander K. Hansen wrote:
On Apr 5, 2005, at 2:10 PM, Curtis Vaughan wrote:
I have been trying to finish an update-all now for several days. And 
now I've got to the point where update-all fails on control-center, 
as I understand (see below).
I have tried simply fink remove (and purge) control-center in the 
hopes that by doing that update-all will finish without it. (not 
really sure why I have it anyhow). Of course, I have redone a fink 
selfupdate and then continued with update-all, but to no avail. Hence 
I am writing the group in hopes of an answer on hope to get fink to 
finally finish updating all.

Curtis
Merging translations into Desktop.directory.
make[3]: *** [Desktop.directory] Bus error
make[3]: *** Deleting file `Desktop.directory'
make[2]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
make: *** [all-recursive-am] Error 2
### execution of make failed, exit code 2
Removing build lock...
dpkg -r fink-buildlock-control-center-1.4.0.5-17
(Reading database ... 98623 files and directories currently 
installed.)
Removing fink-buildlock-control-center-1.4.0.5-17 ...
Failed: phase compiling: control-center-1.4.0.5-17 failed



What version of OSX do you have?  and What version of fink do you have 
("fink --version")?

If you're on Panther (as is suggested by the -17 revision) I'm very 
surprised that you can't get a later version:

http://fink.sourceforge.net/pdb/package.php/control-center
Of course I'm on Jaquar (10.3.8) and fink --version gives:
Package manager version: 0.24.2
Distribution version: 0.7.1.rsync

---
SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now.
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click
___
Fink-users mailing list
Fink-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users

Re: [Fink-users] fink update-all stops files at control-center

[Alexander K. Hansen]

On Apr 5, 2005, at 2:10 PM, Curtis Vaughan wrote:
I have been trying to finish an update-all now for several days. And 
now I've got to the point where update-all fails on control-center, as 
I understand (see below).
I have tried simply fink remove (and purge) control-center in the 
hopes that by doing that update-all will finish without it. (not 
really sure why I have it anyhow). Of course, I have redone a fink 
selfupdate and then continued with update-all, but to no avail. Hence 
I am writing the group in hopes of an answer on hope to get fink to 
finally finish updating all.

Curtis
Merging translations into Desktop.directory.
make[3]: *** [Desktop.directory] Bus error
make[3]: *** Deleting file `Desktop.directory'
make[2]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
make: *** [all-recursive-am] Error 2
### execution of make failed, exit code 2
Removing build lock...
dpkg -r fink-buildlock-control-center-1.4.0.5-17
(Reading database ... 98623 files and directories currently installed.)
Removing fink-buildlock-control-center-1.4.0.5-17 ...
Failed: phase compiling: control-center-1.4.0.5-17 failed


What version of OSX do you have?  and What version of fink do you have 
("fink --version")?

If you're on Panther (as is suggested by the -17 revision) I'm very 
surprised that you can't get a later version:

http://fink.sourceforge.net/pdb/package.php/control-center
--
Alexander Hansen
Fink Documentarian
[Day Job] Levitated Dipole Experiment
http://www.psfc.mit.edu/LDX

---
SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now.
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click
___
Fink-users mailing list
Fink-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users

Re: [Fink-users] fink update-all stops files at control-center

[Curtis Vaughan]

I have been trying to finish an update-all now for several days. And 
now I've got to the point where update-all fails on control-center, as 
I understand (see below).
I have tried simply fink remove (and purge) control-center in the hopes 
that by doing that update-all will finish without it. (not really sure 
why I have it anyhow). Of course, I have redone a fink selfupdate and 
then continued with update-all, but to no avail. Hence I am writing the 
group in hopes of an answer on hope to get fink to finally finish 
updating all.

Curtis
Merging translations into Desktop.directory.
make[3]: *** [Desktop.directory] Bus error
make[3]: *** Deleting file `Desktop.directory'
make[2]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
make: *** [all-recursive-am] Error 2
### execution of make failed, exit code 2
Removing build lock...
dpkg -r fink-buildlock-control-center-1.4.0.5-17
(Reading database ... 98623 files and directories currently installed.)
Removing fink-buildlock-control-center-1.4.0.5-17 ...
Failed: phase compiling: control-center-1.4.0.5-17 failed

---
SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now.
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click
___
Fink-users mailing list
Fink-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users

Re: [Fink-users] fink update-all stops files at control-center

[Curtis Vaughan]

On 03 Apr, 2005, at 18:28, Alexander K. Hansen wrote:
On Apr 3, 2005, at 1:53 PM, Curtis Vaughan wrote:
I have been trying to finish an update-all now for several days. And 
now I've got to the point where update-all fails on control-center, 
as I understand (see below).
I have tried simply fink remove (and purge) control-center in the 
hopes that by doing that update-all will finish without it. (not 
really sure why I have it anyhow). Of course, I have redone a fink 
selfupdate and then continued with update-all, but to no avail. Hence 
I am writing the group in hopes of an answer on hope to get fink to 
finally finish updating all.

Curtis
### execution of make failed, exit code 2
Removing build lock...
dpkg -r fink-buildlock-control-center-1.4.0.5-17
(Reading database ... 98623 files and directories currently 
installed.)
Removing fink-buildlock-control-center-1.4.0.5-17 ...
Failed: phase compiling: control-center-1.4.0.5-17 failed


What' you've quoted is a general result of _ANY_ failed compile.
The real error is above that.
--

OK, here is what was just above that:
Merging translations into Desktop.directory.
make[3]: *** [Desktop.directory] Bus error
make[3]: *** Deleting file `Desktop.directory'
make[2]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
make: *** [all-recursive-am] Error 2
Also a build of control-center immediately says there is no package to 
install.

Curtis

---
SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now.
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click
___
Fink-users mailing list
Fink-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users

Re: [Fink-users] fink update-all stops files at control-center

[Brian Morton]

Try rebuilding control-center by itself. Then once it has successfully 
built, continue on with the update-all. Repeat each time a package 
borks itself. Took me 6 tries last time, but control-center was not one 
of the problems.

Good luck,
Brian
On Apr 3, 2005, at 7:28 PM, Alexander K. Hansen wrote:
On Apr 3, 2005, at 1:53 PM, Curtis Vaughan wrote:
I have been trying to finish an update-all now for several days. And 
now I've got to the point where update-all fails on control-center, 
as I understand (see below).
I have tried simply fink remove (and purge) control-center in the 
hopes that by doing that update-all will finish without it. (not 
really sure why I have it anyhow). Of course, I have redone a fink 
selfupdate and then continued with update-all, but to no avail. Hence 
I am writing the group in hopes of an answer on hope to get fink to 
finally finish updating all.

Curtis
### execution of make failed, exit code 2
Removing build lock...
dpkg -r fink-buildlock-control-center-1.4.0.5-17
(Reading database ... 98623 files and directories currently 
installed.)
Removing fink-buildlock-control-center-1.4.0.5-17 ...
Failed: phase compiling: control-center-1.4.0.5-17 failed


What' you've quoted is a general result of _ANY_ failed compile.
The real error is above that.
--
Alexander K. Hansen
Associate Research Scientist, Columbia University
visiting MIT Plasma Science and Fusion Center
Levitated Dipole Experiment
175 Albany Street, NW17-219
Cambridge, MA  02139-4213

---
SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real 
users.
Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now.
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click
___
Fink-users mailing list
Fink-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users
---
[This E-mail scanned for viruses by Utahweb]


---
[This E-mail scanned for viruses by Utahweb]

---
SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now.
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click
___
Fink-users mailing list
Fink-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users

Re: [Fink-users] fink update-all stops files at control-center

[Alexander K. Hansen]

On Apr 3, 2005, at 1:53 PM, Curtis Vaughan wrote:
I have been trying to finish an update-all now for several days. And 
now I've got to the point where update-all fails on control-center, as 
I understand (see below).
I have tried simply fink remove (and purge) control-center in the 
hopes that by doing that update-all will finish without it. (not 
really sure why I have it anyhow). Of course, I have redone a fink 
selfupdate and then continued with update-all, but to no avail. Hence 
I am writing the group in hopes of an answer on hope to get fink to 
finally finish updating all.

Curtis
### execution of make failed, exit code 2
Removing build lock...
dpkg -r fink-buildlock-control-center-1.4.0.5-17
(Reading database ... 98623 files and directories currently installed.)
Removing fink-buildlock-control-center-1.4.0.5-17 ...
Failed: phase compiling: control-center-1.4.0.5-17 failed

What' you've quoted is a general result of _ANY_ failed compile.
The real error is above that.
--
Alexander K. Hansen
Associate Research Scientist, Columbia University
visiting MIT Plasma Science and Fusion Center
Levitated Dipole Experiment
175 Albany Street, NW17-219
Cambridge, MA  02139-4213

---
SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now.
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click
___
Fink-users mailing list
Fink-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users

Re: [Fink-users] fink update-all fails.

[Alexander K. Hansen]

Did you try the suggestion from:

http://fink.sourceforge.net/faq/comp-general.php?phpLang=en#node-exists

?

On Apr 30, 2004, at 12:08 PM, lj Palmer wrote:

Error:
$> fink update-all
/usr/bin/sudo /sw/bin/fink  update-all
Information about 3088 packages read in 3 seconds.
Failed: Internal error: node for db42-ssl-shlibs already exists
Using Fink unstable tree
$> fink --version
Package manager version: 0.20.1
Distribution version: 0.7.0.cvs
Mac OSX: 10.3.3
17" 1 gHZ iMac
Any Ideas?

..lj



---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: Oracle 10g
Get certified on the hottest thing ever to hit the market... Oracle 
10g. Take an Oracle 10g class now, and we'll give you the exam FREE.
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=3149&alloc_id=8166&op=click
___
Fink-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users

--
Alexander K. Hansen
Associate Research Scientist, Columbia University
visiting MIT Plasma Science and Fusion Center
Levitated Dipole Experiment
175 Albany Street, NW17-219
Cambridge, MA  02139-4213


---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: Oracle 10g
Get certified on the hottest thing ever to hit the market... Oracle 10g. 
Take an Oracle 10g class now, and we'll give you the exam FREE.
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=3149&alloc_id=8166&op=click
___
Fink-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users

Re: [Fink-users] fink update-all fails.

[Remi Mommsen]

Hi,

On Apr 30, 2004, at 9:08 AM, lj Palmer wrote:

Error:
$> fink update-all
/usr/bin/sudo /sw/bin/fink  update-all
Information about 3088 packages read in 3 seconds.
Failed: Internal error: node for db42-ssl-shlibs already exists
Using Fink unstable tree
$> fink --version
Package manager version: 0.20.1
Distribution version: 0.7.0.cvs
Mac OSX: 10.3.3
17" 1 gHZ iMac
Any Ideas?
Reading the FAQ: 
http://fink.sourceforge.net/faq/comp-general.php?phpLang=en#node-exists

HTH,
Remi
-
Q: How many kinds of physicists are there?
A: Three. Those who can count and those who can't.
*
Remigius K. Mommsen e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
University of California, Irvine   URL:http://cern.ch/mommsen
c/o SLAC voice:++1 (650) 926-3595
2575 Sand Hill Road #35fax:++1 (650) 926-3882
Menlo Park, CA 94025, US  home:++1 (650) 233-9041
*


---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: Oracle 10g
Get certified on the hottest thing ever to hit the market... Oracle 10g. 
Take an Oracle 10g class now, and we'll give you the exam FREE.
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=3149&alloc_id=8166&op=click
___
Fink-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users

Re: [Fink-users] fink update-all fails

[Mihalis Tsoukalos]

Many thanks.

best regards,
Mihalis.
On Apr 14, 2004, at 17:26, Martin Costabel wrote:

Seems the sourceforge site is coming back to life again...

Mihalis Tsoukalos wrote:

Dear list,
I am having the following situation:
Same situation, same answer as on the fink-beginners list.
---
SUPPORT Mac OS X Unicode support
http://unicode.helmug.gr/


---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials
Free Linux tutorial presented by Daniel Robbins, President and CEO of
GenToo technologies. Learn everything from fundamentals to system
administration.http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1470&alloc_id=3638&op=click
___
Fink-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users

Re: [Fink-users] fink update-all fails

[Martin Costabel]

Seems the sourceforge site is coming back to life again...

Mihalis Tsoukalos wrote:

Dear list,
I am having the following situation:
Same situation, same answer as on the fink-beginners list.

--
Martin


---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials
Free Linux tutorial presented by Daniel Robbins, President and CEO of
GenToo technologies. Learn everything from fundamentals to system
administration.http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1470&alloc_id=3638&op=click
___
Fink-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users

Re: [Fink-users] fink update all problem

[Alexander K. Hansen]

On Apr 5, 2004, at 8:50 AM, Klaus Hereth wrote:

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
After updating fink to the latest version (0. ), I ran fink update
all, which terminates with the following lines:

dpkg -i
/sw/fink/dists/stable/main/binary-darwin-powerpc/x11-system/xfree86_4.
3.99.16-2_darwin-powerpc.deb
/sw/fink/dists/stable/main/binary-darwin-powerpc/x11-system/xfree86-sh
libs_4.3.99.16-2_darwin-powerpc.deb
dpkg: regarding .../xfree86_4.3.99.16-2_darwin-powerpc.deb containing
xfree86: xfree86-base conflicts with x11  xfree86 provides x11 and is
to be installed.
dpkg: error processing
/sw/fink/dists/stable/main/binary-darwin-powerpc/x11-system/xfree86_4.
3.99.16-2_darwin-powerpc.deb (--install): conflicting packages - not
installing xfree86
dpkg: regarding .../xfree86-shlibs_4.3.99.16-2_darwin-powerpc.deb
containing xfree86-shlibs: xfree86-shlibs conflicts with
xfree86-base-shlibs  xfree86-base-shlibs (version 4.2.1.1-3) is
installed.
dpkg: error processing
/sw/fink/dists/stable/main/binary-darwin-powerpc/x11-system/xfree86-sh
libs_4.3.99.16-2_darwin-powerpc.deb (--install): conflicting packages
- - not installing xfree86-shlibsErrors were encountered while
processing:
/sw/fink/dists/stable/main/binary-darwin-powerpc/x11-system/xfree86_4.
3.99.16-2_darwin-powerpc.deb
/sw/fink/dists/stable/main/binary-darwin-powerpc/x11-system/xfree86-sh
libs_4.3.99.16-2_darwin-powerpc.deb
### execution of dpkg failed, exit code 1Failed: can't batch-install
packages:
/sw/fink/dists/stable/main/binary-darwin-powerpc/x11-system/xfree86_4.
3.99.16-2_darwin-powerpc.deb
/sw/fink/dists/stable/main/binary-darwin-powerpc/x11-system/xfree86-sh
libs_4.3.99.16-2_darwin-powerpc.deb

Is that the old X11-discussion again? I'm not using X11 too often,
but do I really have to decide between the two of them?
Regards,

Klaus
Yes you do:

http://fink.sourceforge.net/faq/usage-packages.php?phpLang=en#apple- 
x11-wants-xfree86

And if you really want to be using Apple's X11 you need to clear out  
any prior Fink-installed xfree86 packages.

--
Alexander K. Hansen
Associate Research Scientist, Columbia University
visiting MIT Plasma Science and Fusion Center
Levitated Dipole Experiment
175 Albany Street, NW17-219
Cambridge, MA  02139-4213


---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials
Free Linux tutorial presented by Daniel Robbins, President and CEO of
GenToo technologies. Learn everything from fundamentals to system
administration.http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1470&alloc_id=3638&op=click
___
Fink-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users

Re: [Fink-users] fink update-all: "compiling libxml2-2.4.25-1failed"

[Alexander Hansen]

The problem was apparently do to an error in the .info file.  Max put a
new one out this morning and I was able to do the update.  You should be
able to selfupdate-cvs and try again.

On Mon, 2002-10-07 at 11:25, Andreas Gschwendtner wrote:
> Hi everybody,
> 
> When I tried to do "fink selfupdate-cvs" and "fink update-all" today, I 
> ran into an error. The first command completed without errors, the 
> "fink update-all"-command produced the output shown at the end of this 
> mail. I am running 10.2.1 on a PowerBook G4-500.
> 
> Does anybody have any ideas? Anybody else experienced this problem? My 
> system is actually very clean, just reinstalled everything from scratch 
> 2 or 3 weeks ago. I would appreciate any help.
> 
> Andreas
> 
> -- 
> 
> [tibook:~] andreas% fink update-all
> sudo /sw/bin/fink  update-all
> Information about 1595 packages read in 1 seconds.
> 
> [...]
> 
> The following 3 packages will be installed or updated:
>   libxml2 libxml2-bin libxml2-shlibs
> 
> [...]
> 
> /bin/sh ./libtool --mode=link gcc  -g -O2 -Wall  -o libxml2.la -rpath 
> /sw/lib -version-info 6:25:4 SAX.lo entities.lo encoding.lo error.lo 
> parserInternals.lo parser.lo tree.lo hash.lo list.lo xmlIO.lo 
> xmlmemory.lo uri.lo valid.lo xlink.lo HTMLparser.lo HTMLtree.lo 
> debugXML.lo xpath.lo xpointer.lo xinclude.lo nanohttp.lo nanoftp.lo 
> DOCBparser.lo catalog.lo globals.lo threads.lo c14n.lo xmlregexp.lo 
> xmlschemas.lo xmlschemastypes.lo xmlunicode.lo -lz -L/sw/lib -liconv -lm
> rm -fr .libs/libxml2.la .libs/libxml2.* .libs/libxml2.*
> ./libtool: test: too many arguments
> gcc -dynamiclib -undefined suppress -o .libs/libxml2.2.4.25.dylib  
> SAX.lo entities.lo encoding.lo error.lo parserInternals.lo parser.lo 
> tree.lo hash.lo list.lo xmlIO.lo xmlmemory.lo uri.lo valid.lo xlink.lo 
> HTMLparser.lo HTMLtree.lo debugXML.lo xpath.lo xpointer.lo xinclude.lo 
> nanohttp.lo nanoftp.lo DOCBparser.lo catalog.lo globals.lo threads.lo 
> c14n.lo xmlregexp.lo xmlschemas.lo xmlschemastypes.lo xmlunicode.lo  
> -lz -L/sw/lib -liconv -lm -lc -install_name  /sw/lib/libxml2.2.dylib
> /usr/bin/libtool: internal link edit command failed
> ld: -undefined error must be used when -twolevel_namespace is in effect
> make[2]: *** [libxml2.la] Error 1
> make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
> make: *** [all-recursive-am] Error 2
> ### execution of make failed, exit code 2
> Failed: compiling libxml2-2.4.25-1 failed
> [tibook:~] andreas%
> 
> 
> 
> ---
> This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
> Welcome to geek heaven.
> http://thinkgeek.com/sf
> ___
> Fink-users mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users
> 
-- 
Alexander K. Hansen
Associate Research Scientist, Columbia University 
visiting MIT Plasma Science and Fusion Center
Levitated Dipole Experiment
175 Albany Street, NW17-219
Cambridge, MA  02139-4213


---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
___
Fink-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users

Re: [Fink-users] fink update-all creating a lot of dup libs

[Ben Hines]

On Sunday, August 11, 2002, at 08:28 PM, Brandon Potter wrote:

> Hey all,
> I've noticed I keep getting a lot of duplicate libs after I run fink 
> update-all. Last time I removed 8 and the time before a whopping 32. 
> I'm detecting the dup entries by running fink scanpackages.

What do you mean by duplicate libs?

-Be



---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
___
Fink-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users

Re: [Fink-users] 'fink update-all' in -unstable broken

[Mike O'Brien]

> I think the problem comes from upgrading from binary distro (old-style
> gnome-libs package, not split off) to the new source distro that has the
> splitoff gnome-libs package. (gnome-libs-shlibs)

This seems unlikely, as I have never installed fink binary
distributions.  I started right off with source.  Thanks for the
reference, though.  I'll study it.


---
This sf.net email is sponsored by: Jabber - The world's fastest growing 
real-time communications platform! Don't just IM. Build it in! 
http://www.jabber.com/osdn/xim
___
Fink-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users

Re: [Fink-users] 'fink update-all' in -unstable broken

[Ben Hines]

On Tuesday, July 16, 2002, at 02:59  PM, Mike O'Brien wrote:
>>
>
>   Sure enough, this fixed the problem.  What IS the problem,
> anyway?  Is it a circular dependency?  Inquiring minds want to know,
> so they can better understand what happened...and fix it themselves
> the next time!
>

I think the problem comes from upgrading from binary distro (old-style 
gnome-libs package, not split off) to the new source distro that has the 
splitoff gnome-libs package. (gnome-libs-shlibs)

If that makes any sense to you. :)
http://fink.sourceforge.net/doc/packaging/policy.php#sharedlibs explains 
what splitoffs are a little.

-Ben



---
This sf.net email is sponsored by: Jabber - The world's fastest growing 
real-time communications platform! Don't just IM. Build it in! 
http://www.jabber.com/osdn/xim
___
Fink-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users

Re: [Fink-users] 'fink update-all' in -unstable broken

[Mike O'Brien]

> Someone else just had the same problem.

Might have been me.  I reported this yesterday, and re-reported
today mentioning the suggested fixes that didn't work.

> The fix is:
> dpkg -r --force-depends gnome-libs
> fink update-all

Sure enough, this fixed the problem.  What IS the problem,
anyway?  Is it a circular dependency?  Inquiring minds want to know,
so they can better understand what happened...and fix it themselves
the next time!

Many, many thanks!

Mike O'Brien


---
This sf.net email is sponsored by: Jabber - The world's fastest growing 
real-time communications platform! Don't just IM. Build it in! 
http://www.jabber.com/osdn/xim
___
Fink-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users

Re: [Fink-users] 'fink update-all' in -unstable broken

[Ben Hines]

Someone else just had the same problem. The fix is:

dpkg -r --force-depends gnome-libs
fink update-all

-Ben



---
This sf.net email is sponsored by: Jabber - The world's fastest growing 
real-time communications platform! Don't just IM. Build it in! 
http://www.jabber.com/osdn/xim
___
Fink-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users

Re: [Fink-users] fink update-all from cvs and building lesstif, lesstif-shlibs fails

[David R. Morrison]

> Last night I did a fink selfupdate (from CVS), followed by a fink
> update-all, and received a number of packages to update,
> including lesstif and lesstif-shlibs.

> Sweet Josephine, doens't lesstif take a very long time to build
> (or is it the shlibs that take a long time to build?). Anyway,
> the build and/or install fails complaining that
> /sw/src/root-lesstif-0.93.18-3/sw/share/aclocal doesn't exist.

Please run fink selfupdate-cvs again, and try again.  I have added
  BuildDepends: automake 
to this package, which should fix the problem.

  -- Dave


___
Hundreds of nodes, one monster rendering program.
Now that's a super model! Visit http://clustering.foundries.sf.net/

___
Fink-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users

RE: [Fink-users] Fink update-all with new gcc

[Hester, Jeffrey W.]

Thanks for the info Martin.  (I can't e-mail to you either from work for
some reason.  [EMAIL PROTECTED] is my personal address.)

I also tried to file a bug report (bugreport.apple.com) as suggested to
request Apple include f77/g77 in the next release.  The bug report app
wouldn't let me in, even with my valid ADC username and password.  I am glad
that Apple is doing it's best (supposedly) to keep up with the GNU gcc.  I
look forward to the official 3.1 release from Apple.  I'm sure it will be
better than having to build it ourselves via CVS.  I hear several other big
changes are in store for OS X.2.

   Jeff

> --
> From: Martin Costabel
> Sent: Sunday, April 14, 2002 7:14 AM
> To:   Finlay Dobbie
> Cc:   '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
> Subject:  Re: [Fink-users] Fink update-all with new gcc
> 
> (Cut down on CC list; otherwise we'll start a a duplicate list; and Jeff
> Hester's address isn't working for me anyway)
> 
> Finlay Dobbie wrote:
>  
> > Actually, they're merging in upstream GCC quite frequently, or at least
> > were, and GCC 3.1 is set to go final RSN (tomorrow according to
> > http://gcc.gnu.org/develop.html, but apparently they're not going to
> > make that and are slipping the release date by about 2 weeks). OTOH, it
> > will continue moving along at quite a rapid pace, and I expect that it
> > won't be usable until about 3.1.1 or later (a few months down the line,
> > in other words). Since Apple seems to be set on shipping gcc3.1 in the
> > next major OS release, it'll be interesting to see the quality of the
> > version that we receive.
> 
> My interpretation of the few cryptic remarks I saw is the following (I
> may be wrong, of course):
> 
> Apple's forthcoming release will be based on the "nervous weasel" branch
> of their cvs tree, not on the trunk. In the trunk, they are trying to
> keep up with GNU, so there will eventually be an Apple gcc-3.1 based on
> FSF's released gcc-3.1. The branch, however, was forked sometime in
> March and is (or calls itself) "based on gcc version 3.1 20020105
> (experimental)". That's why I suspect the "experimental" will still be
> there for quite a while.
> 
> -- 
> Martin
> 
> ___
> Fink-users mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users
> 
> 

___
Fink-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users

RE: [Fink-users] Fink update-all with new gcc

[Ben Hines]

At 9:43 AM -0500 4/15/02, Hester, Jeffrey W. wrote:
>Thanks for the info Martin.  (I can't e-mail to you either from work for
>some reason.  [EMAIL PROTECTED] is my personal address.)
>
>I also tried to file a bug report (bugreport.apple.com) as suggested to
>request Apple include f77/g77 in the next release.  The bug report app
>wouldn't let me in, even with my valid ADC username and password.  I am glad



Just do what it says, and email [EMAIL PROTECTED] letting them know 
you want access. That's by design to keep out the riffraff. (though 
they claim it is a bug.. that they haven't been able to fix for a 
year+)

-Ben
-- 
http://homepage.mac.com/bhines/

___
Fink-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users

Re: [Fink-users] Fink update-all with new gcc

[Max Horn]

At 19:48 Uhr +0100 14.04.2002, Finlay Dobbie wrote:
>On Sunday, April 14, 2002, at 01:14 PM, Martin Costabel wrote:
>
>>My interpretation of the few cryptic remarks I saw is the following (I
>>may be wrong, of course):
>>
>>Apple's forthcoming release will be based on the "nervous weasel" branch
>>of their cvs tree, not on the trunk. In the trunk, they are trying to
>>keep up with GNU, so there will eventually be an Apple gcc-3.1 based on
>>FSF's released gcc-3.1. The branch, however, was forked sometime in
>>March and is (or calls itself) "based on gcc version 3.1 20020105
>>(experimental)". That's why I suspect the "experimental" will still be
>>there for quite a while.
>
>Ah, that sounds quite likely actually, I think I've heard something 
>along those lines from Stan Shebs on the darwin-development list a 
>while back, come to think of it. Pfft... Typical Apple behaviour 
>though: ship a non-final compiler ;-)

Well, one could argue whether that is bad or not. The alternative 
would be to delay the new compiler even more and wait till the FSF 
gets around to finalizing GCC 3.1, which is scheduled for mid-april - 
but you know how it is with schedules. But even once gcc 3.1 is 
finalized, they can't just ship it! They sti ll have to have a ton of 
changes atop it, and a compiler which is used to compile the entire 
operating system and many many applications better be rock stable and 
proven to generate correct code. Considering the coupld of disasters 
the GCC followers had to go thru with past 3.x release (which had to 
be quickly superceded by fixed version due to critical bugs), Apple 
just can't trust the 3.1 release immediatly. So add at least another 
month, that'd be mid-may.

But it's vital that a broad range of developers get access to the 3.1 
tool chains ASAP, so that they can start adapting their code base. In 
the Linux worlds, they had gcc 3.x for ages now, so many apps are 
adpated (and if you wrote your C++ code only against gcc 2.95.2, you 
*will* have to make a lot of adjustments to compile on a proper C++ 
compiler).

So, for once, I don't think this was a bad choice, but rather about 
the best thing Apple could do (short of releaseing a 3.1 chooltain 
even earlier ).


Max
-- 
---
Max Horn
Software Developer

email: 
phone: (+49) 6151-494890

___
Fink-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users

Re: [Fink-users] Fink update-all with new gcc

[Finlay Dobbie]

On Sunday, April 14, 2002, at 01:14 PM, Martin Costabel wrote:

> My interpretation of the few cryptic remarks I saw is the following (I
> may be wrong, of course):
>
> Apple's forthcoming release will be based on the "nervous weasel" branch
> of their cvs tree, not on the trunk. In the trunk, they are trying to
> keep up with GNU, so there will eventually be an Apple gcc-3.1 based on
> FSF's released gcc-3.1. The branch, however, was forked sometime in
> March and is (or calls itself) "based on gcc version 3.1 20020105
> (experimental)". That's why I suspect the "experimental" will still be
> there for quite a while.

Ah, that sounds quite likely actually, I think I've heard something 
along those lines from Stan Shebs on the darwin-development list a while 
back, come to think of it. Pfft... Typical Apple behaviour though: ship 
a non-final compiler ;-)

  -- Finlay


___
Fink-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users

Re: [Fink-users] Fink update-all with new gcc

[Martin Costabel]

(Cut down on CC list; otherwise we'll start a a duplicate list; and Jeff
Hester's address isn't working for me anyway)

Finlay Dobbie wrote:
 
> Actually, they're merging in upstream GCC quite frequently, or at least
> were, and GCC 3.1 is set to go final RSN (tomorrow according to
> http://gcc.gnu.org/develop.html, but apparently they're not going to
> make that and are slipping the release date by about 2 weeks). OTOH, it
> will continue moving along at quite a rapid pace, and I expect that it
> won't be usable until about 3.1.1 or later (a few months down the line,
> in other words). Since Apple seems to be set on shipping gcc3.1 in the
> next major OS release, it'll be interesting to see the quality of the
> version that we receive.

My interpretation of the few cryptic remarks I saw is the following (I
may be wrong, of course):

Apple's forthcoming release will be based on the "nervous weasel" branch
of their cvs tree, not on the trunk. In the trunk, they are trying to
keep up with GNU, so there will eventually be an Apple gcc-3.1 based on
FSF's released gcc-3.1. The branch, however, was forked sometime in
March and is (or calls itself) "based on gcc version 3.1 20020105
(experimental)". That's why I suspect the "experimental" will still be
there for quite a while.

-- 
Martin

___
Fink-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users

Re: [Fink-users] Fink update-all with new gcc

[Finlay Dobbie]

On Thursday, April 11, 2002, at 05:47 PM, Martin Costabel wrote:

>> Note the experimental... From what i read on the lists, Apple's GCC
>
> The "experimental" here is an attribute of the gcc version on which
> Apple's version is based and it will probably stay there for a while. I
> would bet that it'll still be there when Apple releases its gcc3 as
> standard compiler.

Actually, they're merging in upstream GCC quite frequently, or at least 
were, and GCC 3.1 is set to go final RSN (tomorrow according to 
http://gcc.gnu.org/develop.html, but apparently they're not going to 
make that and are slipping the release date by about 2 weeks). OTOH, it 
will continue moving along at quite a rapid pace, and I expect that it 
won't be usable until about 3.1.1 or later (a few months down the line, 
in other words). Since Apple seems to be set on shipping gcc3.1 in the 
next major OS release, it'll be interesting to see the quality of the 
version that we receive.

  -- Finlay


___
Fink-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users

Re: [Fink-users] Fink update-all with new gcc

[Martin Costabel]

Ben Hines wrote:
> 
> At 10:14 AM -0500 4/11/02, Hester, Jeffrey W. wrote:
> >
> >  > then it starts building correctly. This is with
> >>  Apple Computer, Inc. GCC version 1025, based on gcc version 3.1 20020105
> >  > (experimental)
> >  >
> 
> Note the experimental... From what i read on the lists, Apple's GCC

The "experimental" here is an attribute of the gcc version on which
Apple's version is based and it will probably stay there for a while. I
would bet that it'll still be there when Apple releases its gcc3 as
standard compiler. 

> 3.1 might have different bugs on a day to day basis. Thus, it is
> pretty much a waste of time to report problems with it, to anyone.
> (except maybe apple, on the gcc lists)

I agree with you that we should not start changing fink info files in
order to accomodate what is right now a severely broken tool chain. The
problem with cpp-precomp will (hopefully) go away when the new dev tools
will be released. Right now we have the old cpp-precomp which does not
work at all with the new compiler, even if there is nothing to preprocess.

OTOH, it is better to be prepared when the new dev tools will come out,
so this discussion is perhaps not a complete waste of time. (Plus, the
feedback here is *way* better than on the Apple lists :-)).

-- 
Martin

___
Fink-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users

RE: [Fink-users] Fink update-all with new gcc

[Ben Hines]

At 10:14 AM -0500 4/11/02, Hester, Jeffrey W. wrote:
>
>  > then it starts building correctly. This is with
>>  Apple Computer, Inc. GCC version 1025, based on gcc version 3.1 20020105
>  > (experimental)
>  >


Note the experimental... From what i read on the lists, Apple's GCC 
3.1 might have different bugs on a day to day basis. Thus, it is 
pretty much a waste of time to report problems with it, to anyone. 
(except maybe apple, on the gcc lists)

-Ben
-- 
http://homepage.mac.com/bhines/

___
Fink-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users

RE: [Fink-users] Fink update-all with new gcc

[Hester, Jeffrey W.]

The same error (because of not having the '-no-cpp-precomp' flag) occurs in
trying to compile the latest version of DDD (ddd-3.3.1-2).  The main DDD
directory compiles fine because this flag is set but when it moves to the
"libiberty" directory to compile those files, with argv.c being the first
one, it dies because it's not set.  It can't be changed there because as
part of the install of DDD it does a "rm -rf ddd-3.3.1-2".  The specific
error is below.

Making all in libiberty
if [ x"no" = xyes ] && [ ! -d pic ]; then \
  mkdir pic; \
else true; fi
touch stamp-picdir
test x"no" != xyes || \
  gcc -c -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -g -I. -I./../includeargv.c -o pic/argv.o
gcc -c -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -g -I. -I./../include   argv.c
cpp-precomp: could not open '/usr/include/gcc/darwin/3.1'
make[1]: *** [argv.o] Error 1
make: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
### make failed, exit code 2
Failed: compiling ddd-3.3.1-2 failed

Thanks.

   Jeff


> --
> From: Martin Costabel
> Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2002 4:09 PM
> To:   Hester, Jeffrey W.; '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
> Subject:  Re: [Fink-users] Fink update-all with new gcc
> 
> Martin Costabel wrote:
> > 
> > "Hester, Jeffrey W." wrote:
> > 
> > > checking for C compiler default output... configure: error: C compiler
> cannot
> > > create executables
> > 
> > Standard answer to questions about configure failure: What does the
> > config.log file say at the end?
> 
> After looking at this myself, I see that this is again a problem with
> this @#%!#@ cpp-precomp. If you change the db3 info file as follows
> 
> -(cd build_unix; ../dist/configure %c)
> +(cd build_unix;  export CPPFLAGS="-no-cpp-precomp"; ../dist/configure %c)
> 
> then it starts building correctly. This is with 
> Apple Computer, Inc. GCC version 1025, based on gcc version 3.1 20020105
> (experimental)
> 
> -- 
> Martin
> 
> ___
> Fink-users mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users
> 
> 

___
Fink-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users

Re: [Fink-users] Fink update-all with new gcc

[Martin Costabel]

Martin Costabel wrote:
> 
> "Hester, Jeffrey W." wrote:
> 
> > checking for C compiler default output... configure: error: C compiler cannot
> > create executables
> 
> Standard answer to questions about configure failure: What does the
> config.log file say at the end?

After looking at this myself, I see that this is again a problem with
this @#%!#@ cpp-precomp. If you change the db3 info file as follows

-(cd build_unix; ../dist/configure %c)
+(cd build_unix;  export CPPFLAGS="-no-cpp-precomp"; ../dist/configure %c)

then it starts building correctly. This is with 
Apple Computer, Inc. GCC version 1025, based on gcc version 3.1 20020105 (experimental)

-- 
Martin

___
Fink-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users

Re: [Fink-users] Fink update-all with new gcc

[Martin Costabel]

"Hester, Jeffrey W." wrote:

> checking for C compiler default output... configure: error: C compiler cannot
> create executables

Standard answer to questions about configure failure: What does the
config.log file say at the end?

-- 
Martin

___
Fink-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users

Re: [Fink-users] fink update-all kacks on 'gnupg' update...

[Viktor Haag]

Patrick berry writes:
 > You can run `fink configure` and answer 'N' to "Allow passive ftp 
 > transfers."

I could, but the problem is that wouldn't help me in my current
position. Our firewall policies preclude me from doing anything
but passive ftp transfers. What I really need is for
ftp.gnupg.org to change their policies, or an alternate mirror.

Luckily, a local fink user fired me a copy of the tarball, but I
can see this coming up again in the future... .

Viktor

 > On Tuesday, March 26, 2002, at 01:38  PM, Viktor Haag wrote:
 > 
 > >
 > > I run 'fink update-all' and it tells me that it wants to
 > > install/update a number of new packages, including gnupg-1.0.6.
 > >
 > > Very good, I tell it go ahead, and then curl kacks when
 > > attempting to grab the gnupg tarball from ftp.gnupg.org.
 > >
 > > A little investigation reveals that the folks at ftp.gnupg.org
 > > seem to have turned off support for PASV mode transfers.
 > >
 > > Is there any way around this? Can the gnupg source be gotten from
 > > an alternate mirror somehow?
 > >
 > > Since I'm behind a firewall at work, I'm pretty certain that I'm
 > > only allowed to use ftp in PASV mode.
 > >
 > > I'm rather new to fink and OSX, but I'm not a unix newbie nor a
 > > Mac newbie (Macs at home, Linux at work, now Macs at home, Mac
 > > OSX at work).
 > >
 > > --
 > > Viktor Haag : Software & Information Design : Research In Motion
 > >   +--+
 > >  "If I think it is the beginning of a new age in which,
 > > essentially, freedom of speech is only something we can afford in
 > >  prosperous and calm times, then I would say that is the end of
 > >  the United States of America being a country I admire."
 > >
 > >
 > > ___
 > > Fink-users mailing list
 > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users

-- 
Viktor Haag : Software & Information Design : Research In Motion
  +--+
"In many cases the argument over which shell is best for
interactive use is based upon which key to press for completion."


___
Fink-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users

Re: [Fink-users] fink update-all kacks on 'gnupg' update...

[Patrick berry]

You can run `fink configure` and answer 'N' to "Allow passive ftp 
transfers."

Pat

On Tuesday, March 26, 2002, at 01:38  PM, Viktor Haag wrote:

>
> I run 'fink update-all' and it tells me that it wants to
> install/update a number of new packages, including gnupg-1.0.6.
>
> Very good, I tell it go ahead, and then curl kacks when
> attempting to grab the gnupg tarball from ftp.gnupg.org.
>
> A little investigation reveals that the folks at ftp.gnupg.org
> seem to have turned off support for PASV mode transfers.
>
> Is there any way around this? Can the gnupg source be gotten from
> an alternate mirror somehow?
>
> Since I'm behind a firewall at work, I'm pretty certain that I'm
> only allowed to use ftp in PASV mode.
>
> I'm rather new to fink and OSX, but I'm not a unix newbie nor a
> Mac newbie (Macs at home, Linux at work, now Macs at home, Mac
> OSX at work).
>
> --
> Viktor Haag : Software & Information Design : Research In Motion
>   +--+
>  "If I think it is the beginning of a new age in which,
> essentially, freedom of speech is only something we can afford in
>  prosperous and calm times, then I would say that is the end of
>  the United States of America being a country I admire."
>
>
> ___
> Fink-users mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users


___
Fink-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users

Re: [Fink-users] fink update-all kacks on 'gnupg' update...

[Alexander Hansen]

How about

http://fink.sourceforge.net/bindist/source/gnupg-1.0.6.tar.gz

and

http://fink.sourceforge.net/bindist/source/gnupg-docs-20010910.tar.gz

?

You can download them manually by whatever means you are able, and then
copy the files to /sw/src.  Then you are good to go.
--
Alexander K. Hansen
Associate Research Scientist, Columbia University
Levitated Dipole Experiment
MIT Plasma Science and Fusion Center, 175 Albany Street, NW17-219
Cambridge, MA  02139-4213
Phone:  617-252-1818Fax:208-988-4057

On Tue, 26 Mar 2002, Viktor Haag wrote:

>
> I run 'fink update-all' and it tells me that it wants to
> install/update a number of new packages, including gnupg-1.0.6.
>
> Very good, I tell it go ahead, and then curl kacks when
> attempting to grab the gnupg tarball from ftp.gnupg.org.
>
> A little investigation reveals that the folks at ftp.gnupg.org
> seem to have turned off support for PASV mode transfers.
>
> Is there any way around this? Can the gnupg source be gotten from
> an alternate mirror somehow?
>
> Since I'm behind a firewall at work, I'm pretty certain that I'm
> only allowed to use ftp in PASV mode.
>
> I'm rather new to fink and OSX, but I'm not a unix newbie nor a
> Mac newbie (Macs at home, Linux at work, now Macs at home, Mac
> OSX at work).
>
> --
> Viktor Haag : Software & Information Design : Research In Motion
>   +--+
>  "If I think it is the beginning of a new age in which,
> essentially, freedom of speech is only something we can afford in
>  prosperous and calm times, then I would say that is the end of
>  the United States of America being a country I admire."
>
>
> ___
> Fink-users mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users
>


___
Fink-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users

Re: [Fink-users] fink update-all killed octave !!!

[Gordon Messmer]

On Fri, 18 Jan 2002, Jeff Whitaker wrote:

> I've fixed hdf5 in CVS.  Apparently, "--without-ssl" was not good enough -
> I've now added a config.cache file through the patch that tricks it into
> not linking libssl and libcrypto if they are installed.

Why not just fix configure.in to actually honour --without-ssl?

-- 
If I had a dollar for every brain that you don't have,
I'd have one dollar. - Squidward to SpongeBob



___
Fink-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users

Re: [Fink-users] fink update-all killed octave !!!

[Max Horn]

At 10:50 Uhr -0700 18.01.2002, Jeff Whitaker wrote:
>  > >What has octave to do with openssl??
>>  >
>>  >otool -L /sw/bin/octave doesn't show any dependency on libssl either.
>>
>>  But libhdf5 has, it seems - which isn't good! It violates the policy. Ugh.
>>
>>
>
>I've fixed hdf5 in CVS.  Apparently, "--without-ssl" was not good enough -
>I've now added a config.cache file through the patch that tricks it into
>not linking libssl and libcrypto if they are installed.

Very good, thanks.


Max
-- 
---
Max Horn
Software Developer

email: 
phone: (+49) 6151-494890

___
Fink-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users

Re: [Fink-users] fink update-all killed octave !!!

[Jeff Whitaker]

> >What has octave to do with openssl??
> >
> >otool -L /sw/bin/octave doesn't show any dependency on libssl either.
>
> But libhdf5 has, it seems - which isn't good! It violates the policy. Ugh.
>
>

I've fixed hdf5 in CVS.  Apparently, "--without-ssl" was not good enough -
I've now added a config.cache file through the patch that tricks it into
not linking libssl and libcrypto if they are installed.

-Jeff

-- 
Jeffrey S. Whitaker Phone  : (303)497-6313
Meteorologist   FAX: (303)497-6449
NOAA/OAR/CDC  R/CDC1Email  : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
325 BroadwayWeb: www.cdc.noaa.gov/~jsw
Boulder, CO, USA 80303-3328 Office : Skaggs Research Cntr 1D-124


___
Fink-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users

Re: [Fink-users] fink update-all killed octave !!!

[Max Horn]

At 9:32 Uhr +0100 18.01.2002, Martin Costabel wrote:
>Jens Uwe Noeckel wrote:
>>
>>  OK, all my octave babies are playing again. fink rebuild and fink
>>  install did the job. Still mysterious what happened in the first place...
>
>Talking about mysterious problems with octave, here is mine:
>
>% octave
>dyld: octave can't open library: /sw/lib/libssl.0.9.6.dylib  (No such
>file or directory, errno = 2)
>and it quits immediately.
>
>What has octave to do with openssl??
>
>otool -L /sw/bin/octave doesn't show any dependency on libssl either.

But libhdf5 has, it seems - which isn't good! It violates the policy. Ugh.


>I have to explain that I am doing my Fink compiling on a different
>machine and use apt-get to install the results on this one here. On the
>remote machine, I have Fink's openssl installed, but not on this one. If
>I do install openssl from fink, octave works. But I don't want to, and I
>don't see why I should.

Of course. This is a bug, not a feature.

If hdf5 absolutly has to depend on ssl, then openssl must be added as 
a dependency, and jdf5 be moved to the crypto tree. It would be 
preferable, though, if it could be built w/o ssl, possibly providing 
two packages, one in crypto, one in main.



Max
-- 
---
Max Horn
Software Developer

email: 
phone: (+49) 6151-494890

___
Fink-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users

Re: [Fink-users] fink update-all killed octave !!!

[Martin Costabel]

Jens Uwe Noeckel wrote:
> 
> OK, all my octave babies are playing again. fink rebuild and fink
> install did the job. Still mysterious what happened in the first place...

Talking about mysterious problems with octave, here is mine:

% octave
dyld: octave can't open library: /sw/lib/libssl.0.9.6.dylib  (No such
file or directory, errno = 2)
and it quits immediately.

What has octave to do with openssl??

otool -L /sw/bin/octave doesn't show any dependency on libssl either.

I have to explain that I am doing my Fink compiling on a different
machine and use apt-get to install the results on this one here. On the
remote machine, I have Fink's openssl installed, but not on this one. If
I do install openssl from fink, octave works. But I don't want to, and I
don't see why I should.

-- 
Martin

___
Fink-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users

Re: [Fink-users] fink update-all killed octave !!!

[Jens Uwe Noeckel]

OK, all my octave babies are playing again. fink rebuild and fink 
install did the job. Still mysterious what happened in the first place...

Jens


On Thursday, January 17, 2002, at 12:00 PM, Jens Uwe Noeckel wrote:

> Meanwhile octave is working again on 2 out of 3 Macs here. I did fink 
> remove octave-atlas and then reinstalled. However, this is not working 
> on my dual-G4 Mac. There, the remove command fails to remove 
> /sw/libexec because it still contains a file called rmt ---
> So now I am currently running fink rebuild octave-atlas. The question: 
> does the fact that this rmt file was still there mean anything to 
> anybody ? Does it perhaps give a hint on what went wrong in the 
> previous attempt to update the package ?
>
> Jens
>
>
>
>
>
> ___
> Fink-users mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users
>


___
Fink-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users

Re: [Fink-users] fink update-all killed octave !!!

[Jens Uwe Noeckel]

Meanwhile octave is working again on 2 out of 3 Macs here. I did fink 
remove octave-atlas and then reinstalled. However, this is not working 
on my dual-G4 Mac. There, the remove command fails to remove /sw/libexec 
because it still contains a file called rmt ---
So now I am currently running fink rebuild octave-atlas. The question: 
does the fact that this rmt file was still there mean anything to 
anybody ? Does it perhaps give a hint on what went wrong in the previous 
attempt to update the package ?

Jens





___
Fink-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users