Eric, Thanks for your interest in FiPy. I'll benchmark your code, but
before I do that, can you tell me which version of FiPy you are using
(trunk or version-2_1?) so we are comparing apples with apples. Thanks
On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 5:03 PM, Erik Sherwood wes...@bu.edu wrote:
Hi all,
I am
Erik, Just from a cursory glance, I noticed that the viewers are being
called at every step. This can be expensive.
Apologies for using Eric rather than Erik in the last email.
On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 5:03 PM, Erik Sherwood wes...@bu.edu wrote:
for step in range(steps):
print Step
I'd thought of this as well, and the time for a run with updating at
every time step is 243 seconds vs. 219 seconds with updating every 100
steps.
Erik
On Sep 30, 2010, at 11:36 AM, Daniel Wheeler wrote:
Erik, Just from a cursory glance, I noticed that the viewers are being
called at
Thanks for taking a look at the code. I'm using FiPy 2.1.
Erik
On Sep 30, 2010, at 11:21 AM, Daniel Wheeler wrote:
Eric, Thanks for your interest in FiPy. I'll benchmark your code, but
before I do that, can you tell me which version of FiPy you are using
(trunk or version-2_1?) so we are
I'm running a workshop right now, so won't have time to look at this for a day
or two and it sounds like Daniel is on it.
One thing that occurs to me is that you should be able to use an
ImplicitSourceTerm for Suu and Svv, which might reduce the number of sweeps.
How many sweeps are you
