Hi Jonathan,
I am excited for PETSc and wish I could help!
Is there any form adaptive mesh refinement on the horizon?
Best,
-Mike
On 6/7/17 4:03 PM, Guyer, Jonathan E. Dr. (Fed) wrote:
> Yes. More likely to happen is that we'll add support for PETSc, but that's
> not imminent, either.
>
>> O
Yes. More likely to happen is that we'll add support for PETSc, but that's not
imminent, either.
> On Jun 7, 2017, at 3:08 PM, Michael J. Waters wrote:
>
> Hi Daniel,
>
> So FiPy running in Python 3 won't have MPI based parallelism until
> PyTrilinos supports Python 3?
>
> Best,
>
> -Mike
>
Hi Daniel,
So FiPy running in Python 3 won't have MPI based parallelism until
PyTrilinos supports Python 3?
Best,
-Mike
On 6/7/17 2:01 PM, Daniel Wheeler wrote:
> Hi Nils,
>
> FiPy is not written for Python 3, but it does work after applying
> 2to3. However, only the Scipy solvers are then av
Hi Nils,
FiPy is not written for Python 3, but it does work after applying
2to3. However, only the Scipy solvers are then available. See,
https://www.ctcms.nist.gov/fipy/documentation/USAGE.html#running-under-python-3
To fully make the switch to Python 3, FiPy needs to be natively
updated, w
hi,
i'm considering updating my scripts from 2.7 to python 3.4 or 3.6.
should i expect any problems? is fipy tested on py 3?
thanks!
0xF0A5C638.asc
Description: application/pgp-keys
___
fipy mailing list
fipy@nist.gov
http://www.ctcms.nist.gov/fipy
