[Firebird-devel] Crash in boot build with VC9 and Win32, AGAIN

2011-04-02 Thread Claudio Valderrama C.
Hello, after retrieving latest changes, I'm still watching the same crash in the boot build. Building isql (Win32\debug)... Microsoft (R) Visual Studio Version 9.0.30729.1. Copyright (C) Microsoft Corp. All rights reserved. 1>-- Build started: Project: isql, Configuration: Debug Win32 --

Re: [Firebird-devel] Window functions in V2.5 branch

2011-04-02 Thread Kjell Rilbe
Den 2011-04-02 19:56 skrev Thomas Steinmaurer såhär: >> On Sat, Apr 2, 2011 at 2:02 PM, Thomas Steinmaurer >> wrote: > in respect to the sub-release policy, I guess that forthcoming V2.5 > sub-releases also won't include new features. But, would it be > *technical* possible to add th

Re: [Firebird-devel] Window functions in V2.5 branch

2011-04-02 Thread Thomas Steinmaurer
> On Sat, Apr 2, 2011 at 2:02 PM, Thomas Steinmaurer > wrote: in respect to the sub-release policy, I guess that forthcoming V2.5 sub-releases also won't include new features. But, would it be *technical* possible to add the Window functions to the V2.5 branch or is there too

Re: [Firebird-devel] Window functions in V2.5 branch

2011-04-02 Thread Thomas Steinmaurer
>> in respect to the sub-release policy, I guess that forthcoming V2.5 >> sub-releases also won't include new features. But, would it be >> *technical* possible to add the Window functions to the V2.5 branch or >> is there too much needed from the V3 code base? > > Too much, sorry. Ok. Thanks! Th

Re: [Firebird-devel] Window functions in V2.5 branch

2011-04-02 Thread Dmitry Yemanov
02.04.2011 12:53, Thomas Steinmaurer wrote: > > in respect to the sub-release policy, I guess that forthcoming V2.5 > sub-releases also won't include new features. But, would it be > *technical* possible to add the Window functions to the V2.5 branch or > is there too much needed from the V3 code b

Re: [Firebird-devel] Window functions in V2.5 branch

2011-04-02 Thread marius adrian popa
On Sat, Apr 2, 2011 at 2:02 PM, Thomas Steinmaurer wrote: >>> in respect to the sub-release policy, I guess that forthcoming V2.5 >>> sub-releases also won't include new features. But, would it be >>> *technical* possible to add the Window functions to the V2.5 branch or >>> is there too much nee

Re: [Firebird-devel] Window functions in V2.5 branch

2011-04-02 Thread Thomas Steinmaurer
>> in respect to the sub-release policy, I guess that forthcoming V2.5 >> sub-releases also won't include new features. But, would it be >> *technical* possible to add the Window functions to the V2.5 branch or >> is there too much needed from the V3 code base? > good question > it would be nice ye

Re: [Firebird-devel] Window functions in V2.5 branch

2011-04-02 Thread Thomas Steinmaurer
> in respect to the sub-release policy, I guess that forthcoming V2.5 > sub-releases also won't include new features. But, would it be > *technical* possible to add the Window functions to the V2.5 branch or > is there too much needed from the V3 code base? Especially as V3 has a long way to go ..

Re: [Firebird-devel] Window functions in V2.5 branch

2011-04-02 Thread Philippe Makowski
Thomas Steinmaurer [2011-04-02 10:53] : > > in respect to the sub-release policy, I guess that forthcoming V2.5 > sub-releases also won't include new features. But, would it be > *technical* possible to add the Window functions to the V2.5 branch or > is there too much needed from the V3 code

[Firebird-devel] Window functions in V2.5 branch

2011-04-02 Thread Thomas Steinmaurer
Hello, in respect to the sub-release policy, I guess that forthcoming V2.5 sub-releases also won't include new features. But, would it be *technical* possible to add the Window functions to the V2.5 branch or is there too much needed from the V3 code base? Thanks! Thomas ---