Am 15. Juli 2012 18:23:55 schrieb Mark Rotteveel
>
> I do know that Roman was already planning to migrate to Subversion
> before I joined, so maybe he has additional reasons.
Reasons were:
- same VCS for Firebird (core project uses SVN, some others do as well);
- should be supported by SF.net an
15.07.2012 18:57, Mark Rotteveel wrote:
> The
> advantage in Subversion is that client -> server also sends diffs where
> CVS sends the full file from client to server.
Unfortunately, it does not send diffs when comparing two non-current
versions. Instead
it sends two full files and do compar
On 15-7-2012 16:51, Dimitry Sibiryakov wrote:
> 15.07.2012 15:11, Paul Reeves wrote:
>> I've found subversion to be way quicker to checkout
>
> It is strange because SVN usually doesn't use compression during network
> transfer in
> contrast to CVS. Of course, if you have 100mb network, it doe
Paul Reeves wrote:
> Overall I haven't yet found a compelling need to move my local code from cvs,
> but if I did I think I would look at git before svn. Interesting that you
> prefer hg over git. Maybe I should have a look at that someday.
Actually it's a little academic ... I prefer TortoiseHg a
On 15-7-2012 13:30, Lester Caine wrote:
> Mark Rotteveel wrote:
>> I don't want to make this a source control beauty contest:).
>
> DO you actually NEED to migrate from CVS? Dimitry did ask, and to be honest,
> in
> the absence of a better option on the DVCS front, staying with CVS is just as
> va
15.07.2012 15:11, Paul Reeves wrote:
> I've found subversion to be way quicker to checkout
It is strange because SVN usually doesn't use compression during network
transfer in
contrast to CVS. Of course, if you have 100mb network, it doesn't matter...
--
WBR, SD.
-
On Sunday 15 Jul 2012 12:30:23 Lester Caine wrote:
>
> Will Subversion actually add anything other than wasting time and requiring
> people to rewrok their end of things.
>
Rewrok? We should add that as a new word in the language - To spend time fixing
things that worked fine before. :-)
Anyw
Mark Rotteveel wrote:
> I don't want to make this a source control beauty contest:).
DO you actually NEED to migrate from CVS? Dimitry did ask, and to be honest, in
the absence of a better option on the DVCS front, staying with CVS is just as
valid a choice these days. Will Subversion actually a
On 15-7-2012 6:53, marius adrian popa wrote:
> I can help you to migrate it to git i did a few years ago some scripts ,
> svn is against my principles : complex and slow
> http://mapopa.blogspot.ro/2009/12/found-bug-in-git-cvsimport-so-i-will.html
I don't want to make this a source control beauty
