Re: [Firebird-devel] Fwd: SourceForge Repo Clone Complete

2012-12-16 Thread Dmitry Yemanov
Pavel et al, > Your cloned repository code in project firebird is now ready for use. > > Old repository url: http://firebird.svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/firebird > > New repository checkout command: svn checkout --username=pcisar > svn+ssh://[email protected]/p/firebird/code/trunk firebird-co

Re: [Firebird-devel] Fwd: SourceForge Repo Clone Complete

2012-12-16 Thread Vlad Khorsun
> You and any other developers should do a fresh checkout using the new > repository location. Please, read my message about relocation. Checkout more than 10 copies of different branches looks as overkill for me. Thanks, Vlad --

Re: [Firebird-devel] Fwd: SourceForge Repo Clone Complete

2012-12-16 Thread Dimitry Sibiryakov
16.12.2012 18:49, Pavel Cisar wrote: > You and any other developers should do a fresh checkout using the new > repository location. I see why they insist on fresh checkout: "svn switch" command doesn't work. Damn, in this SVN nothing works as should... :( -- WBR, SD. ---

[Firebird-devel] Fwd: SourceForge Repo Clone Complete

2012-12-16 Thread Pavel Cisar
Původní zpráva Předmět:SourceForge Repo Clone Complete Datum: Sun, 16 Dec 2012 12:20:34 + Od: SourceForge.net Přeposláno - Komu: [email protected] Komu: [email protected] Your cloned repository code in project firebird is now ready for use. Old repo

Re: [Firebird-devel] Upgrade of Firebird project to new Alluraplatform

2012-12-16 Thread Vlad Khorsun
>> Ahh - understood. It's RO now. And status is still importing... >> Pavel, is not it time to ask SF for support? I understand that our repo >> is big, but at least it's 2012 now, and servers are fast. >> >> > > The Code link in http://sourceforge.net/projects/firebird/ is giving a > error no

Re: [Firebird-devel] Upgrade of Firebird project to new Allura platform

2012-12-16 Thread Philippe Makowski
Adriano dos Santos Fernandes [2012-12-16 13:57] : > The Code link in http://sourceforge.net/projects/firebird/ is giving a > error now. it is slowly coming it seems : http://sourceforge.net/p/firebird/code/57496/tree/ --

Re: [Firebird-devel] Upgrade of Firebird project to new Allura platform

2012-12-16 Thread Adriano dos Santos Fernandes
On 16-12-2012 07:50, Alex Peshkoff wrote: > On 12/16/12 13:43, Alex Peshkoff wrote: >> On 12/16/12 12:53, Mark Rotteveel wrote: >>> On 15-12-2012 12:46, Pavel Cisar wrote: Mark, Core upgrade is already finished, now it migrates code repositories (don't know how long it will take

Re: [Firebird-devel] Upgrade of Firebird project to new Allura platform

2012-12-16 Thread Pavel Cisar
Dne 16.12.2012 10:50, Alex Peshkoff napsal(a): > On 12/16/12 13:43, Alex Peshkoff wrote: >> On 12/16/12 12:53, Mark Rotteveel wrote: >>> On 15-12-2012 12:46, Pavel Cisar wrote: Mark, Core upgrade is already finished, now it migrates code repositories (don't know how long it wi

Re: [Firebird-devel] Upgrade of Firebird project to new Allura platform

2012-12-16 Thread Alex Peshkoff
On 12/16/12 13:43, Alex Peshkoff wrote: > On 12/16/12 12:53, Mark Rotteveel wrote: >> On 15-12-2012 12:46, Pavel Cisar wrote: >>> Mark, >>> >>> Core upgrade is already finished, now it migrates code repositories >>> (don't know how long it will take as ours are huge). Project developers >>> should

Re: [Firebird-devel] Upgrade of Firebird project to new Allura platform

2012-12-16 Thread Alex Peshkoff
On 12/16/12 12:53, Mark Rotteveel wrote: > On 15-12-2012 12:46, Pavel Cisar wrote: >> Mark, >> >> Core upgrade is already finished, now it migrates code repositories >> (don't know how long it will take as ours are huge). Project developers >> should get an automatic e-mail when it's done. I'll for

Re: [Firebird-devel] Upgrade of Firebird project to new Allura platform

2012-12-16 Thread Mark Rotteveel
On 15-12-2012 12:46, Pavel Cisar wrote: > Mark, > > Core upgrade is already finished, now it migrates code repositories > (don't know how long it will take as ours are huge). Project developers > should get an automatic e-mail when it's done. I'll forward it here too > for others. Is there any ind