On 01/10/13 23:30, Damyan Ivanov wrote:
> -=| Philippe Makowski, 10.01.2013 18:46:05 +0100 |=-
>> working on the daily build and tests, I got a bug in 'make
>> silent_install' under Debian Ubuntu 64
>>
>> libraries have symlinks in /usr/lib64, but /usr/lib64 is the wrong place
>> and don't normally
-=| Philippe Makowski, 10.01.2013 18:46:05 +0100 |=-
> working on the daily build and tests, I got a bug in 'make
> silent_install' under Debian Ubuntu 64
>
> libraries have symlinks in /usr/lib64, but /usr/lib64 is the wrong place
> and don't normally exist under Debian Ubuntu 64
> so when you d
Hi,
working on the daily build and tests, I got a bug in 'make
silent_install' under Debian Ubuntu 64
libraries have symlinks in /usr/lib64, but /usr/lib64 is the wrong place
and don't normally exist under Debian Ubuntu 64
so when you do a 'make silent_install', ldconfig doesn't work
Damian, ca
10.01.2013 18:24, Adriano dos Santos Fernandes wrote:
>
> Previously, in-memory metadata was stored on the database, shared by
> multiple (super) attachments.
>
> Now it's in the attachment (att_triggers, att_functions, etc).
>
> Is this temporary (to be adjusted in this version or in the next
> ve
Hi!
Previously, in-memory metadata was stored on the database,shared by
multiple (super) attachments.
Now it's in the attachment (att_triggers, att_functions, etc).
Is this temporary (to be adjusted in this versionor in the next
versions?) or this is definitive in the architecture?
Adriano
-
http://www.firebirdsql.org/en/roadmap/
--
Master Visual Studio, SharePoint, SQL, ASP.NET, C# 2012, HTML5, CSS,
MVC, Windows 8 Apps, JavaScript and much more. Keep your skills current
with LearnDevNow - 3,200 step-by-step v
