[Firebird-devel] ISQL and older ODS

2013-10-09 Thread Adriano dos Santos Fernandes
Hi! Since Firebird 2.1.2, engine and client tools with embedded (GPRE) SQL may access non-existent system fields, which are then resolved to NULL. This ability, for the internal engine code, allowed better (short, faster) code in 2.5, where the server had the support for older ODS. But so far, w

Re: [Firebird-devel] where is the event port allocated

2013-10-09 Thread Alex Peshkoff
On 10/09/13 15:10, Nick Upson wrote: > [root@mydbserver lib]# rpm -qa | grep firebird > firebird-libfbembed-2.1.5.18496.0-4.el5 > firebird-libfbclient-2.1.5.18496.0-4.el5 > firebird-2.1.5.18496.0-4.el5 > firebird-filesystem-2.1.5.18496.0-4.el5 > firebird-classic-2.1.5.18496.0-4.el5 > > from epel I

Re: [Firebird-devel] where is the event port allocated

2013-10-09 Thread Philippe Makowski
Le 09/10/13 13:10, Nick Upson a écrit : > [root@mydbserver lib]# rpm -qa | grep firebird > firebird-libfbembed-2.1.5.18496.0-4.el5 > firebird-libfbclient-2.1.5.18496.0-4.el5 > firebird-2.1.5.18496.0-4.el5 > firebird-filesystem-2.1.5.18496.0-4.el5 > firebird-classic-2.1.5.18496.0-4.el5 > > from epel

Re: [Firebird-devel] where is the event port allocated

2013-10-09 Thread Nick Upson
[root@mydbserver lib]# rpm -qa | grep firebird firebird-libfbembed-2.1.5.18496.0-4.el5 firebird-libfbclient-2.1.5.18496.0-4.el5 firebird-2.1.5.18496.0-4.el5 firebird-filesystem-2.1.5.18496.0-4.el5 firebird-classic-2.1.5.18496.0-4.el5 from epel On 9 October 2013 11:35, Nick Upson wrote: > > I

Re: [Firebird-devel] where is the event port allocated

2013-10-09 Thread Nick Upson
I didn't use any switches to configure at all On 9 October 2013 11:22, Alex wrote: > On 10/09/2013 02:00 PM, Nick Upson wrote: > > I apologize for asking all these questions. > > a) the new libfbembed.so.2.1.5 is much bigger than the installed one, > why? > -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 25391270 O

Re: [Firebird-devel] where is the event port allocated

2013-10-09 Thread Alex
On 10/09/2013 02:00 PM, Nick Upson wrote: I apologize for asking all these questions. a) the new libfbembed.so.2.1.5 is much bigger than the installed one, why? -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 25391270 Oct 9 10:35 ./firebird/lib/libfbembed.so.2.1.5 -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 3683140 Mar 10 2013 ./firebi

Re: [Firebird-devel] where is the event port allocated

2013-10-09 Thread Nick Upson
I apologize for asking all these questions. a) the new libfbembed.so.2.1.5 is much bigger than the installed one, why? -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 25391270 Oct 9 10:35 ./firebird/lib/libfbembed.so.2.1.5 -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 3683140 Mar 10 2013 ./firebird/lib/libfbembed.so.2.1.5.orig b) I now get

Re: [Firebird-devel] where is the event port allocated

2013-10-09 Thread Alex
On 10/09/2013 01:27 PM, Nick Upson wrote: aah, interesting. does that still hold as I'm running classic on unix rather than embeded On 9 October 2013 10:23, Alex > wrote: On 10/09/2013 01:13 PM, Nick Upson wrote: am I correct in thinking that, having run "ma

Re: [Firebird-devel] where is the event port allocated

2013-10-09 Thread Nick Upson
aah, interesting. does that still hold as I'm running classic on unix rather than embeded On 9 October 2013 10:23, Alex wrote: > On 10/09/2013 01:13 PM, Nick Upson wrote: > > am I correct in thinking that, having run "make" I can just copy my > newly build fb_inet_server into a standard insta

Re: [Firebird-devel] where is the event port allocated

2013-10-09 Thread Alex
On 10/09/2013 01:13 PM, Nick Upson wrote: am I correct in thinking that, having run "make" I can just copy my newly build fb_inet_server into a standard installed system for testing? No, that's not enough. fb_inset_server just loads libfbembed.so, which is an actual server. ---

Re: [Firebird-devel] where is the event port allocated

2013-10-09 Thread Nick Upson
am I correct in thinking that, having run "make" I can just copy my newly build fb_inet_server into a standard installed system for testing? On 8 October 2013 15:58, Nick Upson wrote: > Hi Dmitry, > > yes, that why I made changes there. > > my changes just had no effect, even hardcoding the po