I really dont remember if I was able to retest with > 32K, but I found
this message that suggests that the effect of changing this parameter
is different with FB 2.5 compared to 2.1:
- 21-Dec-2011
I ran more tests tonight, and results were very different from the
past year test
16.10.2013 17:01, Leyne, Sean wrote:
> Is this buffer size setting configurable thru a connection/API setting?
AFAIK, no.
--
WBR, SD.
--
October Webinars: Code for Performance
Free Intel webinars can help you acce
> 16.10.2013 14:58, Alex Peshkoff wrote:
> > Telling true I do not remember it...
> > But quite possible.
>
>Most likely my memory doesn't serve me well. Google shows me only
> thread where Carlos H. Cantu tested it up to current limit and got 3x speed
> up, then DE suggested to test it beyo
Raise limit and default value for TcpRemoteBufferSize
-
Key: CORE-4245
URL: http://tracker.firebirdsql.org/browse/CORE-4245
Project: Firebird Core
Issue Type: Improvement
Componen
16.10.2013 14:58, Alex Peshkoff wrote:
> Telling true I do not remember it...
> But quite possible.
Most likely my memory doesn't serve me well. Google shows me only thread
where Carlos
H. Cantu tested it up to current limit and got 3x speed up, then DE suggested
to test it
beyond the limit
On 10/16/13 13:25, Dimitry Sibiryakov wrote:
> Hello, All.
>
> IIRC, couple of years ago Alex tested effect of increasing
> TcpRemoteBufferSize
Telling true I do not remember it...
But quite possible.
> to
> network performance and the tests showed that size 1M results in significant
>
Hello, All.
IIRC, couple of years ago Alex tested effect of increasing
TcpRemoteBufferSize to
network performance and the tests showed that size 1M results in significant
performance
boost for applications that fetch large volumes of data.
But in current firebird.conf in 3.0 I still s
