Re: [Firebird-devel] CORE-5176

2016-03-28 Thread Dimitry Sibiryakov
28.03.2016 20:13, Alex Peshkoff wrote: > What do you think about backporting this interface to B3_0_Release? IMHO, it is pointless. In current form event interface has no value at all. -- WBR, SD. -- Transform

[Firebird-devel] CORE-5176

2016-03-28 Thread Alex Peshkoff
What do you think about backporting this interface to B3_0_Release? http://tracker.firebirdsql.org/browse/CORE-5176 Changed paths: M examples/interfaces/08.events.cpp M src/include/firebird/FirebirdInterface.idl M src/include/firebird/IdlFbInterfaces.h M

[Firebird-devel] [FB-Tracker] Created: (CORE-5176) Add interface replacing isc_event_block() and isc_event_counts() functions

2016-03-28 Thread Alexander Peshkov (JIRA)
Add interface replacing isc_event_block() and isc_event_counts() functions --- Key: CORE-5176 URL: http://tracker.firebirdsql.org/browse/CORE-5176 Project: Firebird Core

Re: [Firebird-devel] src_bundle.sh

2016-03-28 Thread Michal Kubecek
On Mon, Mar 28, 2016 at 04:58:56PM +0100, Wols Lists wrote: > On 28/03/16 15:59, Michal Kubecek wrote: > >> But still clone of Firebird repository is 10 times bigger than its > >> > sources. > > That's one way to look at it. Another way is to say it's about 0.18 EUR > > of disk space in case of a

Re: [Firebird-devel] src_bundle.sh

2016-03-28 Thread Wols Lists
On 28/03/16 15:59, Michal Kubecek wrote: >> But still clone of Firebird repository is 10 times bigger than its >> > sources. > That's one way to look at it. Another way is to say it's about 0.18 EUR > of disk space in case of a SSD and 0.02 EUR in case of classical > magnetic disk. Another way to

Re: [Firebird-devel] [firebird] increment build number (773c7bf)

2016-03-28 Thread Dimitry Sibiryakov
28.03.2016 17:26, Dmitry Yemanov wrote: > In Windows resources (aka FILEVERSION), all four parts A.B.C.D of the > version are 16-bit. Even YYMMDD is not going to fit. Yes, but what is shown in file properties dialog of the latest Windows is language-specific StringFileInfo where FileVersion

Re: [Firebird-devel] [firebird] increment build number (773c7bf)

2016-03-28 Thread Dimitry Sibiryakov
26.03.2016 15:46, Dmitry Yemanov wrote: > Or we may adopt a combined solution. For our own builds, both official > and snapshots, calculate the build number as commit count (as now, but > without storing in the repo). For external builds, gather LAST_COMMIT > and embed it into the version

Re: [Firebird-devel] src_bundle.sh

2016-03-28 Thread Treeve Jelbert
On Mon, 28 Mar 2016 18:07:43 +0300, marius adrian popa wrote: > On Mon, Mar 28, 2016 at 5:59 PM, Michal Kubecek > wrote: > >> On Mon, Mar 28, 2016 at 04:25:15PM +0200, Dimitry Sibiryakov wrote: >> > 28.03.2016 16:16, Jim Starkey wrote: >> > > nothing else was more suitable. >> >

Re: [Firebird-devel] src_bundle.sh

2016-03-28 Thread Jiří Činčura
One can do something like: git gc --prune=now --aggressive git repack -- Mgr. Jiří Činčura Independent IT Specialist -- Transform Data into Opportunity. Accelerate data analysis in your applications with Intel Data

Re: [Firebird-devel] src_bundle.sh

2016-03-28 Thread Dimitry Sibiryakov
28.03.2016 16:59, Michal Kubecek wrote: > BtW., the directory with my checked out trunk from Subversion has 636 MB > for some reason. You either have some temporary files there which you can find with "svn status --no-ignore |grep "^\?" or it is a known SVN problem with internal DB that can

Re: [Firebird-devel] src_bundle.sh

2016-03-28 Thread Michal Kubecek
On Mon, Mar 28, 2016 at 10:49:53AM -0400, Jim Starkey wrote: > On 3/28/2016 10:25 AM, Dimitry Sibiryakov wrote: > > But still clone of Firebird repository is 10 times bigger than its > > sources. > > That's an interesting question. I don't know the answer, but somebody > should research it --

Re: [Firebird-devel] src_bundle.sh

2016-03-28 Thread marius adrian popa
On Mon, Mar 28, 2016 at 5:59 PM, Michal Kubecek wrote: > On Mon, Mar 28, 2016 at 04:25:15PM +0200, Dimitry Sibiryakov wrote: > > 28.03.2016 16:16, Jim Starkey wrote: > > > nothing else was more suitable. > > > > But still clone of Firebird repository is 10 times bigger than its >

Re: [Firebird-devel] src_bundle.sh

2016-03-28 Thread Michal Kubecek
On Mon, Mar 28, 2016 at 04:25:15PM +0200, Dimitry Sibiryakov wrote: > 28.03.2016 16:16, Jim Starkey wrote: > > nothing else was more suitable. > > But still clone of Firebird repository is 10 times bigger than its > sources. That's one way to look at it. Another way is to say it's about 0.18 EUR

Re: [Firebird-devel] src_bundle.sh

2016-03-28 Thread Jim Starkey
On 3/28/2016 10:25 AM, Dimitry Sibiryakov wrote: > 28.03.2016 16:16, Jim Starkey wrote: >> nothing else was more suitable. > But still clone of Firebird repository is 10 times bigger than its > sources. > That's an interesting question. I don't know the answer, but somebody should research

Re: [Firebird-devel] src_bundle.sh

2016-03-28 Thread Artyom Smirnov
> 28 марта 2016 г., в 17:25, Dimitry Sibiryakov написал(а): > > 28.03.2016 16:16, Jim Starkey wrote: >> nothing else was more suitable. > > But still clone of Firebird repository is 10 times bigger than its sources. > If you do not need full history, you can do shallow

Re: [Firebird-devel] src_bundle.sh

2016-03-28 Thread Dimitry Sibiryakov
28.03.2016 16:16, Jim Starkey wrote: > nothing else was more suitable. But still clone of Firebird repository is 10 times bigger than its sources. -- WBR, SD. -- Transform Data into Opportunity. Accelerate data

Re: [Firebird-devel] src_bundle.sh

2016-03-28 Thread Jim Starkey
On 3/28/2016 10:06 AM, Dimitry Sibiryakov wrote: > 28.03.2016 15:29, Alex Peshkoff wrote: >> Somewhy that zip link is awfully slow - download took 2m 12s (compare >> with Firebird-3.0.0.32366-ReleaseCandidate2.tar.bz2 at SF mirror, 24s) > Git is not suitable for large projects with long

Re: [Firebird-devel] src_bundle.sh

2016-03-28 Thread Adriano dos Santos Fernandes
On 28/03/2016 11:06, Dimitry Sibiryakov wrote: > 28.03.2016 15:29, Alex Peshkoff wrote: >> Somewhy that zip link is awfully slow - download took 2m 12s (compare >> with Firebird-3.0.0.32366-ReleaseCandidate2.tar.bz2 at SF mirror, 24s) >Git is not suitable for large projects with long history

Re: [Firebird-devel] src_bundle.sh

2016-03-28 Thread Dimitry Sibiryakov
28.03.2016 15:29, Alex Peshkoff wrote: > Somewhy that zip link is awfully slow - download took 2m 12s (compare > with Firebird-3.0.0.32366-ReleaseCandidate2.tar.bz2 at SF mirror, 24s) Git is not suitable for large projects with long history such as Firebird: long time it has to spend on

Re: [Firebird-devel] src_bundle.sh

2016-03-28 Thread Alex Peshkoff
On 03/28/2016 02:09 PM, Adriano dos Santos Fernandes wrote: > On 28/03/2016 06:24, Alex Peshkoff wrote: >> I think that we do not need that additional problems and therefore >> should not change existing dumb method to generate tarball as long as we >> do not have same quality with new one. >> >>

Re: [Firebird-devel] src_bundle.sh

2016-03-28 Thread Adriano dos Santos Fernandes
On 28/03/2016 06:24, Alex Peshkoff wrote: > > I think that we do not need that additional problems and therefore > should not change existing dumb method to generate tarball as long as we > do not have same quality with new one. > > But for *who* you generate tarballs with this script? To put a

Re: [Firebird-devel] Firebird.pas for the windows build

2016-03-28 Thread Alex Peshkoff
On 03/25/2016 03:51 PM, Alex Peshkoff wrote: > On 03/25/2016 12:48 PM, preeves wrote: >> On Thu, 24 Mar 2016 12:35:25 +0300 >> Alex Peshkoff wrote: >> >>> On 03/23/2016 06:39 PM, preeves wrote: Firebird.pas is generated in the posix builds but it is not generated in

Re: [Firebird-devel] src_bundle.sh

2016-03-28 Thread Alex Peshkoff
On 03/27/2016 09:59 PM, Adriano dos Santos Fernandes wrote: > Em 27/03/2016 15:38, Michal Kubecek escreveu: >> On Sun, Mar 27, 2016 at 10:36:34AM -0300, Adriano dos Santos Fernandes wrote: >>> So, if we want these files for people build sources more easily, we >>> should include them in git. >>