10.08.2016 3:35, Adriano dos Santos Fernandes wrote:
> Em 09/08/2016 12:46, Dimitry Sibiryakov escreveu:
>> Hello, All.
>>
>> With applied patch f532dda9d8207e0d8cfdcd55eb916121fefedcb4, debug build
>> of current
>> master fails on Win64 with following call stack.
>>
>
> This in delete_nod
Em 09/08/2016 12:46, Dimitry Sibiryakov escreveu:
> Hello, All.
>
> With applied patch f532dda9d8207e0d8cfdcd55eb916121fefedcb4, debug build
> of current
> master fails on Win64 with following call stack.
>
This in delete_node looks suspicious at least:
tempData = tempBuf.getB
On 08/05/2016 07:40 PM, Dimitry Sibiryakov wrote:
> 05.08.2016 18:18, Alex Peshkoff wrote:
>> On 08/05/2016 07:01 PM, Dimitry Sibiryakov wrote:
>>> 05.08.2016 17:48, Alex Peshkoff wrote:
That's priority byte. If 2 different clumplets of data from auth block
both map into same authenticati
Hello, All.
With applied patch f532dda9d8207e0d8cfdcd55eb916121fefedcb4, debug build of
current
master fails on Win64 with following call stack.
> msvcr120d.dll!07fe49ca7642()Unknown
> msvcr120d.dll!07fe49dd2044()Unknown
>> engine13.dll!`anonymou