12.08.2022 16:45, Mark Rotteveel wrote:
On 12-08-2022 15:13, Vlad Khorsun wrote:
12.08.2022 15:31, Jiří Činčura wrote:
Hi *,
does the isc_dpb_parallel_workers apply when running sweep via
isc_action_svc_repair + isc_spb_rpr_sweep_db?
Sure.
There is no isc_spb_parallel_workers, so I
On 12-08-2022 15:13, Vlad Khorsun wrote:
12.08.2022 15:31, Jiří Činčura wrote:
Hi *,
does the isc_dpb_parallel_workers apply when running sweep via
isc_action_svc_repair + isc_spb_rpr_sweep_db?
Sure.
There is no isc_spb_parallel_workers, so I would think it doesn't apply
to service
12.08.2022 14:25, Jiří Činčura WROTE:
Is there any prospect for more parallel operations in near future?
Especially around i.e. query processing, basically general database
operations. The reason I'm asking is whether to implement it in .NET
provider on connection string level or only for "gbak"
08.08.2022 9:57, Jiří Činčura wrote:
Is there any prospect for more parallel operations in near future? Especially around i.e. query
processing, basically general database operations. The reason I'm asking is whether to implement it
in .NET provider on connection string level or only for
12.08.2022 15:31, Jiří Činčura wrote:
Hi *,
does the isc_dpb_parallel_workers apply when running sweep via
isc_action_svc_repair + isc_spb_rpr_sweep_db?
Sure.
Regards,
Vlad
Firebird-Devel mailing list, web interface at
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/firebird-devel
Hi *,
does the isc_dpb_parallel_workers apply when running sweep via
isc_action_svc_repair + isc_spb_rpr_sweep_db?
--
Mgr. Jiří Činčura
https://www.tabsoverspaces.com/
Firebird-Devel mailing list, web interface at
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/firebird-devel
> Is there any prospect for more parallel operations in near future?
> Especially around i.e. query processing, basically general database
> operations. The reason I'm asking is whether to implement it in .NET
> provider on connection string level or only for "gbak" and "gfix".
Disregard this
> There isn't one.
>
> CREATE DATABASE immediately executes a ALTER CHARACTER SET SET
> DEFAULT COLLATION.
Thanks. I was hoping there's something on protocol level (to save some
roundtrips).
--
Mgr. Jiří Činčura
https://www.tabsoverspaces.com/
Firebird-Devel mailing list, web interface
>The BLOB_APPEND is not CONCATENATION, it is non-standard function
> with custom semantics.
Yes, it's non-standard function. But even non-standard function can behave in
similar way other functions behave in SQL world. It's not the first
non-standard function we have.
--
Mgr. Jiří
