Re: [Firebird-devel] [NO] RECORD_VERSION

2015-09-14 Thread Helen Borrie
At 08:28 p.m. 14/09/2015, Vlad Khorsun wrote: > NO RECORD_VERSION is the default for READ COMMITTED and it was not changed > since FB 0.x times. >I.e. if TPB containts "isc_tpb_read_committed" tag and contains nor >isc_tpb_rec_version, nor >isc_tpb_no_rec_version, engine will create READ COMMI

Re: [Firebird-devel] [NO] RECORD_VERSION

2015-09-14 Thread Jiří Činčura
On Mon, Sep 14, 2015, at 10:28, Vlad Khorsun wrote: > PS Some client access components/drivers have its own defaults. That was Dmitry Kuzmenko's wild ride 3-4 years back. ;) -- Mgr. Jiří Činčura Independent IT Specialist -

Re: [Firebird-devel] [NO] RECORD_VERSION

2015-09-14 Thread Vlad Khorsun
14.09.2015 11:00, Helen Borrie wrote: > According to both editions of The Firebird Book, for read/write read > committed transactions, RECORD_VERSION is the default. > According to the Firebird 2.5 Language Reference, NO RECORD_VERSION is the > default. > > So - which is it? Did it change at s

Re: [Firebird-devel] [NO] RECORD_VERSION

2015-09-14 Thread Mark Rotteveel
On 14-9-2015 10:00, Helen Borrie wrote: > According to both editions of The Firebird Book, for read/write read > committed transactions, RECORD_VERSION is the default. According to the > Firebird 2.5 Language Reference, NO RECORD_VERSION is the default. > > So - which is it? Did it change at so

[Firebird-devel] [NO] RECORD_VERSION

2015-09-14 Thread Helen Borrie
According to both editions of The Firebird Book, for read/write read committed transactions, RECORD_VERSION is the default. According to the Firebird 2.5 Language Reference, NO RECORD_VERSION is the default. So - which is it? Did it change at some point? If so, at which release/sub-release?