[Firebird-devel] [SPAM] Re: RFC: Timeouts

2017-02-19 Thread Vlad Khorsun
19.02.2017 5:21, Leyne, Sean wrote: > > >>> If I read the documentation correctly, a statement which performed >>> (say) a SELECT against a table that >> > follows a NATURAL scan, which is 'paused' awaiting the next Fetch, would >> run into the timeout, even > though there is no "cost" to the

Re: [Firebird-devel] [SPAM] Re: RFC: Timeouts

2016-08-18 Thread Alex Peshkoff
On 08/18/2016 06:26 PM, Vlad Khorsun wrote: > 18.08.2016 18:08, Dimitry Sibiryakov wrote: >> 18.08.2016 16:55, Vlad Khorsun wrote: >>> Global timeout is a last line of defense for DBA against bad apps, >>> wrong queries, >>> developer mistakes, unlucky days (dropped some indices last week but

[Firebird-devel] [SPAM] Re: RFC: Timeouts

2016-08-18 Thread Vlad Khorsun
18.08.2016 18:08, Dimitry Sibiryakov wrote: > 18.08.2016 16:55, Vlad Khorsun wrote: >>Global timeout is a last line of defense for DBA against bad apps, wrong >> queries, >> developer mistakes, unlucky days (dropped some indices last week but now >> some queries >> got crazy) and so on. It

Re: [Firebird-devel] [SPAM] Re: RFC: Timeouts

2016-08-18 Thread liviuslivius
Hi Vlad, >> I.e interactive Delphi application that fetch only really shown records will >> get error > > when user press "Down" key, > > If user fetch one record per hour - yes, such application should be > better rewritten Is this query in different state that can be distinguished from

[Firebird-devel] [SPAM] Re: RFC: Timeouts

2016-08-18 Thread Vlad Khorsun
17.08.2016 22:07, Dimitry Sibiryakov wrote: > 17.08.2016 20:44, Vlad Khorsun wrote: >>- can't be greater than (non-zero) value at config > >I.e there is no way for DBA to make exceptions for some queries that are > known to be > good, but long, right? Right. Smart DBA should set