Re: [Firebird-devel] FB 3.0 Encryption

2012-10-29 Thread Magnus Johansson
> -Original Message- > From: Alex Peshkoff [mailto:peshk...@mail.ru] > Sent: Monday, October 29, 2012 3:50 PM > To: For discussion among Firebird Developers > Subject: Re: [Firebird-devel] FB 3.0 Encryption > > On 10/29/12 18:39, Magnus Johansson wrote: > >

Re: [Firebird-devel] FB 3.0 Encryption

2012-10-29 Thread Alex Peshkoff
On 10/29/12 18:39, Magnus Johansson wrote: > If you don't mind I'm curious, is the BLR affected by encrypting datapages > containing metadata? May be I do not understand what exactly you mean under 'affected' here. BLR generation knows nothing about encrypted database or not. But because BLR f

Re: [Firebird-devel] FB 3.0 Encryption

2012-10-29 Thread Magnus Johansson
Hi Alex, > > And if so, does that also means that metadata is encrypted as well > > yes Great, so then we go from "Unknown" to "True" protection. I like the 1 byte Boolean to ;-) > > so that > > we don't have to set rdb$xxx_source to null anymore? > > > > > > that's not 1to1 related > > If in

Re: [Firebird-devel] FB 3.0 Encryption

2012-10-29 Thread Alex Peshkoff
On 10/29/12 16:04, Magnus Johansson wrote: > Hi, > > > > On one of the sessions on the conference (nice to meet you all again) Vlad > revisited encryption. > > > > Does I remember correctly that it is index, blob and data pages that is > encrypted? yes > And if so, does that also means that metad

[Firebird-devel] FB 3.0 Encryption

2012-10-29 Thread Magnus Johansson
Hi, On one of the sessions on the conference (nice to meet you all again) Vlad revisited encryption. Does I remember correctly that it is index, blob and data pages that is encrypted? And if so, does that also means that metadata is encrypted as well so that we don't have to set rdb$xxx_so