On 2020-06-16 11:04, Dmitry Yemanov wrote:
16.06.2020 10:49, Alex Peshkoff via Firebird-devel wrote:
Is "constexpr" allowed for usage?
IMO it should.
I'm also playing with some containers I think we should allow:
shared_ptr (with adaptor for our pools), unique_ptr.
I plan to talk more o
16.06.2020 02:35, Adriano dos Santos Fernandes wrote:
You mean: imagine if the normal thing happen? :)
Every Firebird pointer is deleted with global delete.
Didn't overriding of global delete operator cause compilation and runtime problems on
MacOSX at least? And doesn't it require strictly
16.06.2020 10:49, Alex Peshkoff via Firebird-devel wrote:
Is "constexpr" allowed for usage?
IMO it should.
I'm also playing with some containers I think we should allow:
shared_ptr (with adaptor for our pools), unique_ptr.
I plan to talk more on this in the future.
Do we have some sho
On 2020-06-15 21:03, Adriano dos Santos Fernandes wrote:
On 15/06/2020 14:56, Dimitry Sibiryakov wrote:
Hello All.
Is "constexpr" allowed for usage?
IMO it should.
I'm also playing with some containers I think we should allow:
shared_ptr (with adaptor for our pools), unique_ptr.
I pla
On 15/06/2020 18:55, Dimitry Sibiryakov wrote:
> 15.06.2020 23:37, Adriano dos Santos Fernandes wrote:
>> AFAIK unique_ptr does not allocate memory.
>
> Yes, but it deallocates. Imagine mistakenly called delete on a pointer
> got from pool. That's my concern.
>
>
You mean: imagine if the norm
15.06.2020 23:37, Adriano dos Santos Fernandes wrote:
AFAIK unique_ptr does not allocate memory.
Yes, but it deallocates. Imagine mistakenly called delete on a pointer got from pool.
That's my concern.
--
WBR, SD.
Firebird-Devel mailing list, web interface at
https://lists.sourceforg
On 15/06/2020 16:27, Dimitry Sibiryakov wrote:
> 15.06.2020 20:03, Adriano dos Santos Fernandes wrote:
>> I'm also playing with some containers I think we should allow:
>> shared_ptr (with adaptor for our pools), unique_ptr.
>
> unique_ptr is fine if you know a sure way to prevent its usage with
15.06.2020 20:03, Adriano dos Santos Fernandes wrote:
I'm also playing with some containers I think we should allow:
shared_ptr (with adaptor for our pools), unique_ptr.
unique_ptr is fine if you know a sure way to prevent its usage with default allocator
by mistake.
shared_ptr AFAIK uses
On 15/06/2020 14:56, Dimitry Sibiryakov wrote:
> Hello All.
>
> Is "constexpr" allowed for usage?
>
IMO it should.
I'm also playing with some containers I think we should allow:
shared_ptr (with adaptor for our pools), unique_ptr.
I plan to talk more on this in the future.
Adriano
Fire
Hello All.
Is "constexpr" allowed for usage?
--
WBR, SD.
Firebird-Devel mailing list, web interface at
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/firebird-devel
10 matches
Mail list logo
