On 5-3-2015 20:52, Jim Starkey wrote:
On Mar 5, 2015, at 2:30 PM, Roman Simakov roman.sima...@gmail.com wrote:
5 марта 2015 г., в 20:26, Jim Starkey j...@jimstarkey.net написал(а):
read imaginary»
Is it not the same as read uncommited? :)
Oh, certainly not! Read imaginary invents whole
On Mar 5, 2015, at 2:30 PM, Roman Simakov roman.sima...@gmail.com wrote:
5 марта 2015 г., в 20:26, Jim Starkey j...@jimstarkey.net написал(а):
read imaginary»
Is it not the same as read uncommited? :)
Oh, certainly not! Read imaginary invents whole new record(s) conforming to
the
On Mar 5, 2015, at 1:04 PM, Ann Harrison aharri...@nimbusdb.com wrote:
On Mar 5, 2015, at 11:26 AM, liviusliv...@poczta.onet.pl
liviusliv...@poczta.onet.pl wrote:
Hi,
It is usefull for testing purposes. Consider monitoring what actually is in
some table from other connection or
On Mar 5, 2015, at 11:26 AM, liviusliv...@poczta.onet.pl
liviusliv...@poczta.onet.pl wrote:
Hi,
It is usefull for testing purposes. Consider monitoring what actually is in
some table from other connection or software before some long task has
finished.
Nothing is in a table until
Hi,
It is usefull for testing purposes. Consider monitoring what actually is in
some table from other connection or software before some long task has finished.
Regards,
Karol Bieniaszewski
- Reply message -
Od: Mark Rotteveel m...@lawinegevaar.nl
Do: For discussion among Firebird
5 марта 2015 г., в 20:26, Jim Starkey j...@jimstarkey.net написал(а):
read imaginary»
Is it not the same as read uncommited? :)
--
Roman Simakov
--
Dive into the World of Parallel Programming The Go Parallel
