> public delegate* unmanaged[Cdecl] FIREBIRD_IStatus*> getStatus;
I completely ruled out function pointers because I still support .NET Framework
and it's not supported there. But on the second thought this might be a nail in
the coffin of .NET Framework support. Thanks for kicking me.
On 17/01/2022 17:31, Jiří Činčura wrote:
>> I suspect you didn't understand well how easy it is.
>
> I'm all ears. Or actually eyes - I'll be glad to learn some new C#/.NET
> interop tricks.
>
I'd not say it's tricks, certainly not for you.
I just see no difficulty in this more than the C
> I suspect you didn't understand well how easy it is.
I'm all ears. Or actually eyes - I'll be glad to learn some new C#/.NET interop
tricks.
--
Mgr. Jiří Činčura
https://www.tabsoverspaces.com/
Firebird-Devel mailing list, web interface at
On Mon, Jan 17, 2022 at 4:49 PM Jiří Činčura wrote:
> > Similar thing could be done for C#.
>
> Again, I'm not saying it couldn't be done.
>
> It's just with simple export I can call it right here, right now (i.e.
>
> Similar thing could be done for C#.
Again, I'm not saying it couldn't be done.
It's just with simple export I can call it right here, right now (i.e.
https://github.com/FirebirdSQL/NETProvider/blob/master/src/FirebirdSql.Data.FirebirdClient/Client/Native/IFbClient.cs#L83-L85).
It's there,
On 17/01/2022 15:36, Jiří Činčura wrote:
>> The "C library" is just another way to call things.
>>
>> It's binary compatible with the C++ interface. In fact the C++ interface
>> is a wrapper around C objects to be multi compiler compatible.
>
> Sure, I'm not saying it isn't.
>
> It's just way
> The "C library" is just another way to call things.
>
> It's binary compatible with the C++ interface. In fact the C++ interface
> is a wrapper around C objects to be multi compiler compatible.
Sure, I'm not saying it isn't.
It's just way way harder to do this type of interop from C# compared
On 17/01/2022 11:00, Jiří Činčura wrote:
>> Yes - because we can generate pure C OO API in a form I've attached here
>> for illustration.
>
> That would work for me. :)
>
>> No - we never included it into distribution because currently it's not
>> ready for use, some tuning will be needed.
> Yes - because we can generate pure C OO API in a form I've attached here
> for illustration.
That would work for me. :)
> No - we never included it into distribution because currently it's not
> ready for use, some tuning will be needed. Next, you will have to use
> shared library based on
On 1/17/22 15:02, Jiří Činčura wrote:
Hi *,
I'm looking at 12.batch_isc.cpp and wondering whether there's a way to do batching using
pure C methods [1]. Something like simply calling isc_dsql_prepare instead of
IAttachment::prepare. I know I can handle the "this" manually, but that's PIA.
:)
Hi *,
I'm looking at 12.batch_isc.cpp and wondering whether there's a way to do
batching using pure C methods [1]. Something like simply calling
isc_dsql_prepare instead of IAttachment::prepare. I know I can handle the
"this" manually, but that's PIA. :)
--
Mgr. Jiří Činčura
11 matches
Mail list logo
