Helen Borrie wrote Thu, 17 Sep 2015 03:45:43 +0300:
> The new FBLangref 25 says RDB$VIEW_RELATIONS is not used in current
> versions.
It seems to me there is not quite correctly written. Since Firebird 3 this
table even expanded.
--
Simonov Denis
At 01:40 p.m. 17/09/2015, Claudio Valderrama C. wrote:
>Strange assertion in FBLangRef.
It's not a perfect world. ;-)
Muchas gracias!
Helen
--
Monitor Your Dynamic Infrastructure at Any Scale With Datadog!
Get real-tim
> -Original Message-
> From: Helen Borrie [mailto:hele...@tpg.com.au]
> Sent: Miércoles, 16 de Septiembre de 2015 21:46
>
> The new FBLangref 25 says RDB$VIEW_RELATIONS is not used in
> current versions. As Mark R. has pointed in his review (and
> as I meant to ask before, and forgot t
Em 16-09-2015 21:45, Helen Borrie escreveu:
> The new FBLangref 25 says RDB$VIEW_RELATIONS is not used in current versions.
> As Mark R. has pointed in his review (and as I meant to ask before, and
> forgot to!) it clearly *is* used or, at least, populated when a view is
> created.
>
> What's
The new FBLangref 25 says RDB$VIEW_RELATIONS is not used in current versions.
As Mark R. has pointed in his review (and as I meant to ask before, and forgot
to!) it clearly *is* used or, at least, populated when a view is created.
What's the back-story?
Helen
