On 12/16/11 13:39, Adriano dos Santos Fernandes wrote:
> On 16/12/2011 05:24, Vlad Khorsun wrote:
> So now we're spending time while the database is not even completely
> created.
While we can restore previous behavior (put FW ON flag at header page
when database is created
On 16/12/2011 05:24, Vlad Khorsun wrote:
So now we're spending time while the database is not even completely
created.
>>> While we can restore previous behavior (put FW ON flag at header page
>>> when database is created but create db file with this flag switched off) i
>>> prefer
>>> So now we're spending time while the database is not even completely
>>> created.
>>
>> While we can restore previous behavior (put FW ON flag at header page
>> when database is created but create db file with this flag switched off) i
>> prefer
>> to ask - are we really want to maintain
On 15-12-2011 18:11, Vlad Khorsun wrote:
>> As I said before, ext4 performance with FW=ON is much slower than ext3,
>> but I now found something new.
>>
>> I've verified that with FB 2.5, TCS times was ok (0s - 3s), and only
>> with FB 3 they are very bad (first test takes 16s, then 12s, 8s, 7s, 7s
> As I said before, ext4 performance with FW=ON is much slower than ext3,
> but I now found something new.
>
> I've verified that with FB 2.5, TCS times was ok (0s - 3s), and only
> with FB 3 they are very bad (first test takes 16s, then 12s, 8s, 7s, 7s,
> etc)
>
> What I found is that:
>
> Time
All,
As I said before, ext4 performance with FW=ON is much slower than ext3,
but I now found something new.
I've verified that with FB 2.5, TCS times was ok (0s - 3s), and only
with FB 3 they are very bad (first test takes 16s, then 12s, 8s, 7s, 7s,
etc)
What I found is that:
Times was bad only
