> That's parser error.
Dammit. I thought it's complaining about not knowing int128 (expecting
numeric(38)). :o
--
Mgr. Jiří Činčura
https://www.tabsoverspaces.com/
Firebird-Devel mailing list, web interface at
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/firebird-devel
On 2020-09-02 15:51, Dimitry Sibiryakov wrote:
02.09.2020 14:49, Alex Peshkoff via Firebird-devel wrote:
You've forgotten keyword OF in SET BIND statement
I wonder why parser don't throw error in this case...
SQL> set bind int128 to legacy;
Statement failed, SQLSTATE = 42000
Dynamic SQL
02.09.2020 14:49, Alex Peshkoff via Firebird-devel wrote:
You've forgotten keyword OF in SET BIND statement
I wonder why parser don't throw error in this case...
--
WBR, SD.
Firebird-Devel mailing list, web interface at
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/firebird-devel
On 2020-09-02 14:06, Jiří Činčura wrote:
Nobody? Seems like a bug to me...
You've forgotten keyword OF in SET BIND statement:
SQL> set sqlda_display on;
SQL> select sum(cast(1 as bigint)) from rdb$database;
INPUT message field count: 0
OUTPUT message field count: 1
01: sqltype: 32752
Nobody? Seems like a bug to me...
--
Mgr. Jiří Činčura
https://www.tabsoverspaces.com/
Firebird-Devel mailing list, web interface at
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/firebird-devel
>Windows snapshot build seems to be broken for now, use artefacts from CI:
SQL> select sum(cast(1 as bigint)) from rdb$database;
INPUT message field count: 0
OUTPUT message field count: 1
01: sqltype: 32752 INT128 Nullable scale: 0 subtype: 0 len: 16
: name: SUM alias: SUM
: table:
31.08.2020 14:28, Jiří Činčura wrote:
The firebirdsql.org show Beta 2:https://snipboard.io/Rbgm7L.jpg .
Windows snapshot build seems to be broken for now, use artefacts from CI:
https://github.com/FirebirdSQL/firebird/actions/runs/231772533
--
WBR, SD.
Firebird-Devel mailing list, web
>Current version is RC1.
The firebirdsql.org show Beta 2: https://snipboard.io/Rbgm7L.jpg .
--
Mgr. Jiří Činčura
https://www.tabsoverspaces.com/
Firebird-Devel mailing list, web interface at
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/firebird-devel
31.08.2020 14:14, Jiří Činčura wrote:
SQL> show version;
ISQL Version: WI-T4.0.0.1963 Firebird 4.0 Beta 2
Current version is RC1.
--
WBR, SD.
Firebird-Devel mailing list, web interface at
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/firebird-devel
Hi,
why is the result still numeric(38) and not numeric(18) (the "legacy" type)?
SQL> set bind of numeric(38) to legacy;
SQL> select sum(cast(1 as bigint)) from rdb$database;
INPUT message field count: 0
OUTPUT message field count: 1
01: sqltype: 32752 NUMERIC(38) Nullable scale: 0 subtype: 0
On 05.08.2020 v 11:19 Mark Rotteveel wrote:
If you want to map that one as well, you will have to execute SET BIND
OF INT128 TO LEGACY (which will also cover NUMERIC and DECIMAL)
Thanks, now it works as I want.
I have to say, I am a bit surprised that 5.5 * 6.6 leads to an INT128
with scale
Ivan please use for snapshot docs in ~/doc, not b2 RN.
Sent from MailDroidFirebird-Devel mailing list, web interface at
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/firebird-devel
On 05-08-2020 10:09, Ivan Přenosil wrote:
I want numeric values returned as LEGACY, i.e. BIGINT instead of INT128.
However SET BIND converts only NUMERIC or DECIMAL, not NUMERIC with
subtype 0.
(I tried with FB4 Beta 2 and snapshot Firebird-4.0.0.2126)
I am not sure whether this is a bug or I
I want numeric values returned as LEGACY, i.e. BIGINT instead of INT128.
However SET BIND converts only NUMERIC or DECIMAL, not NUMERIC with
subtype 0.
(I tried with FB4 Beta 2 and snapshot Firebird-4.0.0.2126)
I am not sure whether this is a bug or I am just using SET BIND incorrectly?
Here
On 2020-04-30 12:12, Tony Whyman wrote:
In the README.time_zone, the SET BIND OF TIME ZONE TO EXTENDED is
described as being intended to "solve a problem of representing
correct time on clients missing ICU library".
All the text I can find, discusses how this is used when reading a
TIMESTAMP
In the README.time_zone, the SET BIND OF TIME ZONE TO EXTENDED is
described as being intended to "solve a problem of representing correct
time on clients missing ICU library".
All the text I can find, discusses how this is used when reading a
TIMESTAMP WITH TIME ZONE data type from a
On 2019-12-26 18:43, Mark Rotteveel wrote:
128-bit literal - is it Numeric or Decimal?
Given the lack of an int128, we should consider it an exact numeric
literal of either DECIMAL or NUMERIC. The standard says (5.3 ):
"""
22) The declared type of an ENL is an
implementation-defined
On 2019-12-26 19:01, Mark Rotteveel wrote:
On 26/12/2019 16:43, Mark Rotteveel wrote:
Formally, I take this to mean we should choose one type, eg DECIMAL,
but that would probably not match people assuming that literal
without decimal points are integral literals.
We could consider a middle
On 26/12/2019 16:43, Mark Rotteveel wrote:
Formally, I take this to mean we should choose one type, eg DECIMAL, but
that would probably not match people assuming that literal without
decimal points are integral literals.
We could consider a middle ground where literals without decimal point
On 26/12/2019 16:11, Alex Peshkoff via Firebird-devel wrote:
On 2019-12-26 17:40, Mark Rotteveel wrote:
On 25/12/2019 12:11, Alex Peshkoff via Firebird-devel wrote:
On 2019-12-11 18:06, Mark Rotteveel wrote:
In other words, it looks like the mapping:
of INTEGER-backed types
1. ignores
On 2019-12-26 17:40, Mark Rotteveel wrote:
On 25/12/2019 12:11, Alex Peshkoff via Firebird-devel wrote:
On 2019-12-11 18:06, Mark Rotteveel wrote:
In other words, it looks like the mapping:
of INTEGER-backed types
1. ignores subtype information and
Ignoring subtype is as designed
On 25/12/2019 12:11, Alex Peshkoff via Firebird-devel wrote:
On 2019-12-11 18:06, Mark Rotteveel wrote:
In other words, it looks like the mapping:
of INTEGER-backed types
1. ignores subtype information and
Ignoring subtype is as designed here. The aim of SET BIND is to help
client
On 2019-12-11 18:06, Mark Rotteveel wrote:
In other words, it looks like the mapping:
of INTEGER-backed types
1. ignores subtype information and
Ignoring subtype is as designed here. The aim of SET BIND is to help
client deal with fields values in cases when it for some reason can not
The SET BIND OF (and isc_dpb_set_bind) behaviour for NUMERIC / DECIMAL
is a bit odd to me:
For example (using isc_dpb_set_bind) NUMERIC to VARCHAR will map:
- NUMERIC(n, *) where 5 <= n <= 9
- DECIMAL(n, *) where n <= 9
- INTEGER
Given the behaviour for other types, I would expect to map:
-
Alex Peshkoff via Firebird-devel
писал(а) в своём письме Sun, 08 Dec 2019 18:59:12 +0300:
On 2019-12-08 16:39, Simonov Denis via Firebird-devel wrote:
Alex Peshkoff via Firebird-devel
wrote Sun, 08 Dec 2019 15:12:03 +0300:
Thank you, not needed - fixed that.
Fixed, but not
On 2019-12-08 16:56, Mark Rotteveel wrote:
On 08/12/2019 14:39, Simonov Denis via Firebird-devel wrote:
Alex Peshkoff via Firebird-devel
wrote Sun, 08 Dec 2019
15:12:03 +0300:
Thank you, not needed - fixed that.
Fixed, but not completely.
SET BIND OF DECFLOAT(16) NATIVE; -- work OK
On 2019-12-08 16:39, Simonov Denis via Firebird-devel wrote:
Alex Peshkoff via Firebird-devel
wrote Sun, 08 Dec 2019 15:12:03
+0300:
Thank you, not needed - fixed that.
Fixed, but not completely.
SET BIND OF DECFLOAT(16) NATIVE; -- work OK
But
SET BIND OF DECFLOAT(16) TO CHAR;
select
On 2019-12-08 16:55, Mark Rotteveel wrote:
On 08/12/2019 13:12, Alex Peshkoff via Firebird-devel wrote:
On 2019-12-07 18:18, Simonov Denis via Firebird-devel wrote:
I try snapshot 4.0.0.1683. Basically, the new SET BIND OF statement
works as expected. But using a form to return a native type
On 08/12/2019 14:39, Simonov Denis via Firebird-devel wrote:
Alex Peshkoff via Firebird-devel
wrote Sun, 08 Dec 2019 15:12:03 +0300:
Thank you, not needed - fixed that.
Fixed, but not completely.
SET BIND OF DECFLOAT(16) NATIVE; -- work OK
But
SET BIND OF DECFLOAT(16) TO CHAR;
When
On 08/12/2019 13:12, Alex Peshkoff via Firebird-devel wrote:
On 2019-12-07 18:18, Simonov Denis via Firebird-devel wrote:
I try snapshot 4.0.0.1683. Basically, the new SET BIND OF statement
works as expected. But using a form to return a native type does not
work.
SET BIND OF DECFLOAT (34)
Alex Peshkoff via Firebird-devel
wrote Sun, 08 Dec 2019 15:12:03 +0300:
Thank you, not needed - fixed that.
Fixed, but not completely.
SET BIND OF DECFLOAT(16) NATIVE; -- work OK
But
SET BIND OF DECFLOAT(16) TO CHAR;
select
NORMALIZE_DECFLOAT(4300) as n1,
QUANTIZE(2, 9.9) as n2,
On 2019-12-07 18:18, Simonov Denis via Firebird-devel wrote:
I try snapshot 4.0.0.1683. Basically, the new SET BIND OF statement
works as expected. But using a form to return a native type does not
work.
SET BIND OF DECFLOAT (34) TO CHAR (46); - OK
SET BIND OF DECFLOAT (34) NATIVE;
Can not
I try snapshot 4.0.0.1683. Basically, the new SET BIND OF statement works
as expected. But using a form to return a native type does not work.
SET BIND OF DECFLOAT (34) TO CHAR (46); - OK
SET BIND OF DECFLOAT (34) NATIVE;
Can not convert decfloat (34) to unknown.
In addition, I did not see
33 matches
Mail list logo
