> But approaches are so different that both should be supported.
Absolutely. I'm creating the implementation for isc_action_svc_validate right
now. It was just my personal curiosity.
--
Mgr. Jiří Činčura
https://www.tabsoverspaces.com/
Firebird-Devel mailing list, web interface at
On 1/17/19 2:38 PM, Jiří Činčura wrote:
I.e. isc_action_svc_repair is services frontend for gfix utility (needs
exclusive DB access, can repair broken DB) but isc_action_svc_validate
is used for online validation.
OK, so both do validation (in case of isc_spb_rpr_validate_db), it's just
On 1/17/19 1:41 PM, Jiří Činčura wrote:
Hi,
what's the difference between isc_action_svc_repair + isc_spb_rpr_validate_db
and isc_action_svc_validate?
#define isc_action_svc_repair 3 /* Starts database repair
process on the server */
#define isc_action_svc_validate 30
Hi,
what's the difference between isc_action_svc_repair + isc_spb_rpr_validate_db
and isc_action_svc_validate?
--
Mgr. Jiří Činčura
https://www.tabsoverspaces.com/
Firebird-Devel mailing list, web interface at
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/firebird-devel
