On 30/07/2015 13:22, Vlad Khorsun wrote:
> 30.07.2015 19:01, Adriano dos Santos Fernandes пишет:
>> Hi!
>>
>> I purposely put a MODIFY of system tables in epp file without
>> considering dbb->readOnly() flag.
>>
>> And it worked (changed the database) and committed the change.
>>
>> Shouldn't that
30.07.2015 19:32, Dimitry Sibiryakov wrote:
> What's the point to have system transaction read-write?
I will celebrate when (if) it will be readonly.
Regards,
Vlad
--
Firebird-Devel mailing list, web interface at
On 7/30/2015 12:06 PM, Claudio Valderrama C. wrote:
>> I purposely put a MODIFY of system tables in epp file without
>> considering dbb->readOnly() flag.
>>
>> And it worked (changed the database) and committed the change.
>>
>> Shouldn't that be prevent in lower layers?
> Ideally, the low level la
30.07.2015 18:22, Vlad Khorsun wrote:
> To be serious, it also prevents on TRA layer - when you start transaction
> at read-only database, engine adds TRA_readonly flag to it. But you run
> MODIFY in system transaction and bypass this barrier.
>
> BTW, it seems we could add more safety movi
30.07.2015 19:01, Adriano dos Santos Fernandes пишет:
> Hi!
>
> I purposely put a MODIFY of system tables in epp file without
> considering dbb->readOnly() flag.
>
> And it worked (changed the database) and committed the change.
>
> Shouldn't that be prevent in lower layers?
>
> Then I chmod -w the
> -Original Message-
> From: Adriano dos Santos Fernandes [mailto:adrian...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Jueves, 30 de Julio de 2015 13:02
>
> Hi!
>
> I purposely put a MODIFY of system tables in epp file without
> considering dbb->readOnly() flag.
>
> And it worked (changed the database) and com
Hi!
I purposely put a MODIFY of system tables in epp file without
considering dbb->readOnly() flag.
And it worked (changed the database) and committed the change.
Shouldn't that be prevent in lower layers?
Then I chmod -w the database. Then it fails at commit time with:
Statement failed, SQLST
