On 11/29/17 10:57, Jiří Činčura wrote:
OK, the Firebird-4.0.0.816-0_Win32 behaves correctly. Will this go into
3.0.3 as well?
As you can already see it's fixed in FB3 branch too.
--
Check out the vibrant tech
OK, the Firebird-4.0.0.816-0_Win32 behaves correctly. Will this go into
3.0.3 as well?
--
Mgr. Jiří Činčura
https://www.tabsoverspaces.com/
--
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging
> Committed to master.
Great. I'll check the snapshot build tomorrow and I'll let you know.
--
Mgr. Jiří Činčura
https://www.tabsoverspaces.com/
--
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
On 11/28/17 17:03, Jiří Činčura wrote:
Jiří, can you try with this patch? I'm 99% sure it will help you to but
if you can check it will be great.
Can you maybe commit it to some branch/master and I'll get the fresh
build from CI/nightly when it's done? I'm currently not in front of a
computer
> Jiří, can you try with this patch? I'm 99% sure it will help you to but
> if you can check it will be great.
Can you maybe commit it to some branch/master and I'll get the fresh
build from CI/nightly when it's done? I'm currently not in front of a
computer with toolset to build Firebird
On 11/27/17 20:39, Jiří Činčura wrote:
I've reproduced an issue. Somewhere between catching error in looper and
rethrowing it again when leaving looper tdbb_status_vector is cleaned
Great to know, you found it.
Jiří, can you try with this patch? I'm 99% sure it will help you to but
if you
> I've reproduced an issue. Somewhere between catching error in looper and
> rethrowing it again when leaving looper tdbb_status_vector is cleaned
Great to know, you found it.
> up. BTW, for me it's reproduced each time I logoff/logon from/to isql.
Yes. For me as well.
--
Mgr. Jiří
On 11/27/17 17:17, Jiří Činčura wrote:
Any ideas what could be wrong and where to look at?
I've reproduced an issue. Somewhere between catching error in looper and
rethrowing it again when leaving looper tdbb_status_vector is cleaned
up. BTW, for me it's reproduced each time I logoff/logon
>gfix -v -f ?
$ .\gfix.exe -v -fu -user sysdba -password masterkey
C:\Users\Jiri\Downloads\aaa\aaa\aaa.FDB
$
Nothing.
--
Mgr. Jiří Činčura
https://www.tabsoverspaces.com/
--
Check out the vibrant tech community
27.11.2017 16:50, Jiří Činčura wrote:
But mostly wierd is that even in theory crypt plugin can not affect
integrity constraints - encryption works a few logical levels deeper
than constraints violation, that's absolutely different parts of code.
Yeah. I though the database was somewhat
On 11/27/17 18:08, Jiří Činčura wrote:
What is the size of compressed database backup?
52 264 210 bytes, why?
Will not fit into email (32M limit on mail.ru), please put it to some
reasonable share.
--
Check out
> AES128 plugin also works fine for me:
Yeah, as I said. On a new database it works fine. It's something with
this database that triggers some undefined behavior.
--
Mgr. Jiří Činčura
https://www.tabsoverspaces.com/
On 11/27/17 17:17, Jiří Činčura wrote:
Any ideas what could be wrong and where to look at?
AES128 plugin also works fine for me:
localhost bin #
localhost bin # ./isql e1.fdb
Database: e1.fdb, User: SYSDBA
SQL> alter database encrypt with AES128;
SQL> insert into country values('Russia',
> What is the size of compressed database backup?
52 264 210 bytes, why?
--
Mgr. Jiří Činčura
https://www.tabsoverspaces.com/
--
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites,
On 11/27/17 17:55, Jiří Činčura wrote:
To be precise - it's IBSurgeon plugin.
Hmm. Of course, could be. Wondering why it fails only on this database?
Even more. Test table on this database works fine.
What is the size of compressed database backup?
On 11/27/17 17:43, Alex Peshkoff via Firebird-devel wrote:
Wierd - I could not reproduce it with . plugin.
To be precise - it's IBSurgeon plugin.
--
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the
Hi,
I have a weird behavior here. Database after b, no errors. I try to
insert non-unique value into table with unique constraint and it fails
as it should. I encrypt it (AES128 from IBPhoenix) and the same
statement does not fail. Only the next one will throw unique violation.
Here's a snap
17 matches
Mail list logo
