Den 2011-04-02 19:56 skrev Thomas Steinmaurer såhär:
>> On Sat, Apr 2, 2011 at 2:02 PM, Thomas Steinmaurer
>> wrote:
> in respect to the sub-release policy, I guess that forthcoming V2.5
> sub-releases also won't include new features. But, would it be
> *technical* possible to add th
> On Sat, Apr 2, 2011 at 2:02 PM, Thomas Steinmaurer
> wrote:
in respect to the sub-release policy, I guess that forthcoming V2.5
sub-releases also won't include new features. But, would it be
*technical* possible to add the Window functions to the V2.5 branch or
is there too
>> in respect to the sub-release policy, I guess that forthcoming V2.5
>> sub-releases also won't include new features. But, would it be
>> *technical* possible to add the Window functions to the V2.5 branch or
>> is there too much needed from the V3 code base?
>
> Too much, sorry.
Ok. Thanks!
Th
02.04.2011 12:53, Thomas Steinmaurer wrote:
>
> in respect to the sub-release policy, I guess that forthcoming V2.5
> sub-releases also won't include new features. But, would it be
> *technical* possible to add the Window functions to the V2.5 branch or
> is there too much needed from the V3 code b
On Sat, Apr 2, 2011 at 2:02 PM, Thomas Steinmaurer
wrote:
>>> in respect to the sub-release policy, I guess that forthcoming V2.5
>>> sub-releases also won't include new features. But, would it be
>>> *technical* possible to add the Window functions to the V2.5 branch or
>>> is there too much nee
>> in respect to the sub-release policy, I guess that forthcoming V2.5
>> sub-releases also won't include new features. But, would it be
>> *technical* possible to add the Window functions to the V2.5 branch or
>> is there too much needed from the V3 code base?
> good question
> it would be nice ye
> in respect to the sub-release policy, I guess that forthcoming V2.5
> sub-releases also won't include new features. But, would it be
> *technical* possible to add the Window functions to the V2.5 branch or
> is there too much needed from the V3 code base?
Especially as V3 has a long way to go ..
Thomas Steinmaurer [2011-04-02 10:53] :
>
> in respect to the sub-release policy, I guess that forthcoming V2.5
> sub-releases also won't include new features. But, would it be
> *technical* possible to add the Window functions to the V2.5 branch or
> is there too much needed from the V3 code
Hello,
in respect to the sub-release policy, I guess that forthcoming V2.5
sub-releases also won't include new features. But, would it be
*technical* possible to add the Window functions to the V2.5 branch or
is there too much needed from the V3 code base?
Thanks!
Thomas
---