Re: [Firebird-devel] windows test build - least painful way?

2017-03-14 Thread Dmitry Yemanov
28.02.2017 17:18, Michal Kubecek wrote: > > The problem is the series also touches windows specific code (including > WNET and XNET) BTW, you may wipe out WNET at all. We seemed to have an agreement on that. Dmitry --

Re: [Firebird-devel] windows test build - least painful way?

2017-03-01 Thread Vlad Khorsun
01.03.2017 11:20, Dmitry Yemanov wrote: > 28.02.2017 17:18, Michal Kubecek wrote: >> >> as my Hackweek project, I played with struct rem_port and tried to turn >> it into class hierarchy with virtual functions. The plan is to use this >> to implement listening on multiple sockets (CORE-5219) and

Re: [Firebird-devel] windows test build - least painful way?

2017-03-01 Thread Dmitry Yemanov
28.02.2017 17:18, Michal Kubecek wrote: > > as my Hackweek project, I played with struct rem_port and tried to turn > it into class hierarchy with virtual functions. The plan is to use this > to implement listening on multiple sockets (CORE-5219) and possibly also > AF_UNIX socket support but I

[Firebird-devel] windows test build - least painful way?

2017-02-28 Thread Michal Kubecek
Hello, as my Hackweek project, I played with struct rem_port and tried to turn it into class hierarchy with virtual functions. The plan is to use this to implement listening on multiple sockets (CORE-5219) and possibly also AF_UNIX socket support but I didn't get that far yet. Current state of