On 6-1-2018 18:08, Mark Rotteveel wrote:
On 6-1-2018 18:02, Mark Rotteveel wrote:
I just bought a copy of SQL:2016-2, and it says nothing about Infinity
and NaN (or sNaN) for DECFLOAT (nor does it for double or float for
that matter).
I wonder if that means those values are not allowed and sh
> > Would this issue be part of the 3 tracker cases you opened, today, or
> > a separate case?
>
> This would be a separate case.
I'll leave it for you to create a case, since you will be in the best position
to test any fix.
> The case for literals for Infinities and NaNs (CORE-5698) can be
On 2018-01-06 19:10, Leyne, Sean wrote:
Not allowing +/-Infinity, +/-NaN, +/-sNaN for DECFLOAT seems to be
supported by the rules of 6.29 :
Would this issue be part of the 3 tracker cases you opened, today, or
a separate case?
This would be a separate case. The case for literals for Infinitie
> Not allowing +/-Infinity, +/-NaN, +/-sNaN for DECFLOAT seems to be
> supported by the rules of 6.29 :
Would this issue be part of the 3 tracker cases you opened, today, or a
separate case?
Sean
--
Check out the vib
On 6-1-2018 18:02, Mark Rotteveel wrote:
I just bought a copy of SQL:2016-2, and it says nothing about Infinity
and NaN (or sNaN) for DECFLOAT (nor does it for double or float for that
matter).
I wonder if that means those values are not allowed and should instead
raise an exception when inse
I just bought a copy of SQL:2016-2, and it says nothing about Infinity
and NaN (or sNaN) for DECFLOAT (nor does it for double or float for that
matter).
I wonder if that means those values are not allowed and should instead
raise an exception when inserted, or the result of a calculation.
Ma
