Re: [Firebird-devel] Google Summer of Code 2013

On 02/16/13 23:34, Mark Rotteveel wrote: > On 16-2-2013 19:02, Ann Harrison wrote: >> On Sat, Feb 16, 2013 at 8:38 AM, marius adrian popa > > wrote: >> >> Are there some tasks in or around Firebird that could be submitted? I >> believe there are many students out

Re: [Firebird-devel] Google Summer of Code 2013

On 02/16/13 22:02, Ann Harrison wrote: > On Sat, Feb 16, 2013 at 8:38 AM, marius adrian popa wrote: > >> Are there some tasks in or around Firebird that could be submitted? I >> believe there are many students out there who would love to join in the >> DBMS project and learn about DB internals. > >

Re: [Firebird-devel] Google Summer of Code 2013

16.02.2013 22:52, Roman Rokytskyy wrote: > I agree with Mark, server makes more sense. You can strip quite a lot > of code, since one hardly needs multiple connections, I am not sure > about concurrent transactions, most likely they can be stripped as > well. What should remain is the JDBC API, the

Re: [Firebird-devel] Google Summer of Code 2013

> Actually, server makes a lot more sense than client, eg the embedded > engine for clientside datastorage. IMHO you shouldn't connect directly > from a mobile phone to an external databaseserver, it is inefficient and > a lot harder to secure than for example a specific webservice. I agree with M

Re: [Firebird-devel] Google Summer of Code 2013

On 16-2-2013 19:02, Ann Harrison wrote: > > On Sat, Feb 16, 2013 at 8:38 AM, marius adrian popa > wrote: > > Are there some tasks in or around Firebird that could be submitted? I > believe there are many students out there who would love to join in the > DBMS p

Re: [Firebird-devel] Google Summer of Code 2013

On Sat, Feb 16, 2013 at 8:38 AM, marius adrian popa wrote: > Are there some tasks in or around Firebird that could be submitted? I > believe there are many students out there who would love to join in the > DBMS project and learn about DB internals. Probably true. > > > Some of the ideas : > >