On 10/20/14 12:35, Michal Kubecek wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 15, 2014 at 06:50:31PM +0400, Alex Peshkoff wrote:
>> On 10/15/14 17:08, Philippe Makowski wrote:
>>> Le 15/10/14 14:31, Alex Peshkoff a écrit :
Thread destructor function (from my today commit) was first tried in
FB2.5 but that time
On Wed, Oct 15, 2014 at 06:50:31PM +0400, Alex Peshkoff wrote:
> On 10/15/14 17:08, Philippe Makowski wrote:
> > Le 15/10/14 14:31, Alex Peshkoff a écrit :
> >> Thread destructor function (from my today commit) was first tried in
> >> FB2.5 but that time it did not work correctly due to bug in glib
---Original Message-
From: Philippe Makowski
To: firebird-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Sent: сб, 18 окт. 2014 22:17
Subject: Re: [Firebird-devel] Linux requirements for FB3
Alex Peshkoff a écrit le 2014-10-16 11:38 :
> Yes. One can try this
> http://web.firebirdsql.org/download/rabbit
Alex Peshkoff a écrit le 2014-10-16 11:38 :
> Yes. One can try this
> http://web.firebirdsql.org/download/rabbits/alex/sharedMutexTest.tgz
> and report results.
>
under Centos 6.5 kernel 2.6.32-431
it stop (hang ?) at PID 4341 step
there is 18 process owned by testuser (ShareMutexTest)
last
Le 16/10/14 10:08, Dimitry Sibiryakov a écrit :
> 15.10.2014 23:35, Philippe Makowski wrote:
>> marius adrian popa a écrit le 2014-10-15 18:08 :
>>> RHEL-6 will be supported it should be an yes in that table with 2.12
>>>
>> nope, too old kernel 2.6.32
>
> But Alex doesn't remember exactly if
On 10/16/14 12:08, Dimitry Sibiryakov wrote:
> 15.10.2014 23:35, Philippe Makowski wrote:
>> marius adrian popa a écrit le 2014-10-15 18:08 :
>>> RHEL-6 will be supported it should be an yes in that table with 2.12
>>>
>> nope, too old kernel 2.6.32
> But Alex doesn't remember exactly if kerne
15.10.2014 23:35, Philippe Makowski wrote:
> marius adrian popa a écrit le 2014-10-15 18:08 :
>> RHEL-6 will be supported it should be an yes in that table with 2.12
>>
> nope, too old kernel 2.6.32
But Alex doesn't remember exactly if kernel 2.6.32 has the bug he talked
about.
Besides, it i
Philippe,
> Leyne, Sean a écrit le 2014-10-15 17:45 :
> > RHEL-7 was released in September *2000*!!!
> >
> RHEL-6 release date : 10 November 2010
> RHEL-7 release date : 10 June 2014
Thanks
--
Comprehensive Server Monit
marius adrian popa a écrit le 2014-10-15 18:08 :
> RHEL-6 will be supported it should be an yes in that table with 2.12
>
nope, too old kernel 2.6.32
--
Comprehensive Server Monitoring with Site24x7.
Monitor 10 servers f
Leyne, Sean a écrit le 2014-10-15 17:45 :
> RHEL-7 was released in September *2000*!!!
>
RHEL-6 release date : 10 November 2010
RHEL-7 release date : 10 June 2014
--
Comprehensive Server Monitoring with Site24x7.
Monito
RHEL-6 will be supported it should be an yes in that table with 2.12
https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-US/Red_Hat_Enterprise_Linux/6/html/Developer_Guide/libraries.html#lib.version
current servers that i have seen in production they have ubuntu 12.04 ,
14.04 , rhel/centos 6/7 and debian
On 10/15/14 19:45, Leyne, Sean wrote:
> Dmitry,
>
Distro kernel glibc Firebird3 ok
Debian 6 2.6.32 2.11.2 no
Debian 7 3.2.41 2.13yes
RHEL-5 2.6.18 2.5 no
RHEL-6 2.6.32 2.12no
RHE
15.10.2014 19:20, Alex Peshkoff wrote:
> In that case we will have to keep suing a hack with a shared posix mutex
> to avoid an old bug in a kernel fixed in 2.6.33 or 24 (do not remember
> exactly). Showed itself on CS when accessing same db remotely (i.e. as
> firebird user from OS POV) and embed
Dmitry,
>
> >> Distro kernel glibc Firebird3 ok
> >>
> >> Debian 6 2.6.32 2.11.2 no
> >> Debian 7 3.2.41 2.13yes
> >> RHEL-5 2.6.18 2.5 no
> >> RHEL-6 2.6.32 2.12no
> >> RHEL-7 3.102.17yes
> >> SLE
On 10/15/14 19:12, Dmitry Yemanov wrote:
> 15.10.2014 18:50, Alex Peshkoff wrote:
>
>>> Distro kernel glibc Firebird3 ok
>>>
>>> Debian 6 2.6.32 2.11.2 no
>>> Debian 7 3.2.41 2.13yes
>>> RHEL-5 2.6.18 2.5 no
>>> RHEL-6
15.10.2014 18:50, Alex Peshkoff wrote:
>> Distro kernel glibc Firebird3 ok
>>
>> Debian 6 2.6.32 2.11.2 no
>> Debian 7 3.2.41 2.13yes
>> RHEL-5 2.6.18 2.5 no
>> RHEL-6 2.6.32 2.12no
>> RHEL-7 3.102.17
On 10/15/14 17:08, Philippe Makowski wrote:
> Le 15/10/14 14:31, Alex Peshkoff a écrit :
>> Thread destructor function (from my today commit) was first tried in
>> FB2.5 but that time it did not work correctly due to bug in glibc. Now
>> as it was tested by Pavel Zotov it works, at least starting w
Le 15/10/14 14:31, Alex Peshkoff a écrit :
> Thread destructor function (from my today commit) was first tried in
> FB2.5 but that time it did not work correctly due to bug in glibc. Now
> as it was tested by Pavel Zotov it works, at least starting with glibc
> 2.12. Pavel has rather old linux on t
18 matches
Mail list logo