пн, 6 дек. 2021 г. в 23:07, Dimitry Sibiryakov :
>
> Roman Simakov wrote 06.12.2021 18:50:
> > It looks so and we've returned to my original question)
>
>Actually no. It is still unknown which version of Firebird 3.0 you watched
> and which hash was used.
Actually, yes. I use the up-to-date
Roman Simakov wrote 06.12.2021 18:50:
It looks so and we've returned to my original question)
Actually no. It is still unknown which version of Firebird 3.0 you watched
and which hash was used.
--
WBR, SD.
Firebird-Devel mailing list, web interface at
пн, 6 дек. 2021 г. в 15:26, Dimitry Sibiryakov :
>
> Roman Simakov wrote 06.12.2021 13:16:
> > Can you point me to the commit? I see no difference between 3 and 5
> > versions of InternalHash::hash implementation.
>
>It looks like using of CRC32C was backported into some 3.0.X. Original
>
Roman Simakov wrote 06.12.2021 13:16:
Can you point me to the commit? I see no difference between 3 and 5
versions of InternalHash::hash implementation.
It looks like using of CRC32C was backported into some 3.0.X. Original commit
was
Can you point me to the commit? I see no difference between 3 and 5
versions of InternalHash::hash implementation.
пн, 6 дек. 2021 г. в 14:35, Dimitry Sibiryakov :
>
> Dimitry Sibiryakov wrote 06.12.2021 12:26:
> > Hashing function has been changed to one with supposedly "more even"
> >
Dimitry Sibiryakov wrote 06.12.2021 12:26:
Hashing function has been changed to one with supposedly "more even"
distribution of values.
BTW a side effect of this change is that number of slots doesn't have to be
prime anymore.
--
WBR, SD.
Firebird-Devel mailing list, web interface at
Roman Simakov wrote 06.12.2021 12:21:
3.0. Were there any changes in 4 or 5?
Yes. Hashing function has been changed to one with supposedly "more even"
distribution of values.
--
WBR, SD.
Firebird-Devel mailing list, web interface at
пн, 6 дек. 2021 г. в 14:08, Dimitry Sibiryakov :
>
> Roman Simakov wrote 06.12.2021 10:24:
> > We can see:
> > Hash slots: 65521, Hash lengths (min/avg/max):0/ 13/ 30
> > Under heavy load.
>
>On which version do you see it?
3.0. Were there any changes in 4 or 5?
>As long as the
Roman Simakov wrote 06.12.2021 10:24:
We can see:
Hash slots: 65521, Hash lengths (min/avg/max):0/ 13/ 30
Under heavy load.
On which version do you see it?
As long as the first number is zero increasing number of slots won't help.
--
WBR, SD.
Firebird-Devel mailing list, web
пн, 6 дек. 2021 г. в 12:47, Alex Peshkoff via Firebird-devel
:
>
> On 12/6/21 12:24, Roman Simakov wrote:
> > Hello!
> >
> > Isn't it time to increase the maximum number of HashSlots and make it
> > ULONG instead of USHORT? We can see:
> > Hash slots: 65521, Hash lengths (min/avg/max):0/ 13/
On 12/6/21 12:24, Roman Simakov wrote:
Hello!
Isn't it time to increase the maximum number of HashSlots and make it
ULONG instead of USHORT? We can see:
Hash slots: 65521, Hash lengths (min/avg/max):0/ 13/ 30
Under heavy load.
In FB5?
Firebird-Devel mailing list, web interface at
11 matches
Mail list logo
