30.11.2011 12:44, Alex Peshkoff wrote:
>
> Who knows which evil is lesser...
> If one downloads 32-bit build for 64-bit OS, he can always stay with it
> even not knowing that 64 builds exist.
But at least it will work fine for him, even being possibly a bit slower
than the x64 build. And those wh
Hello, Alex!
Wednesday, November 30, 2011, 12:44:50 PM, you wrote:
AP> Who knows which evil is lesser...
AP> If one downloads 32-bit build for 64-bit OS, he can always stay with it
AP> even not knowing that 64 builds exist.
I think this is design flaw of sf.net, and that's it.
Personally, I'd pl
On 11/30/11 12:33, Dmitry Yemanov wrote:
> 30.11.2011 12:24, Mark Rotteveel wrote:
>
>> Is it able to discern between 32 and 64 bit?
> Unfortunately, not.
>
>> On Windows Vista 64 bit (using Firefox 32 bit though)
>> I get the suggestion to download the Firebird 32 bit package.
> This is the lesse
30.11.2011 12:24, Mark Rotteveel wrote:
> Is it able to discern between 32 and 64 bit?
Unfortunately, not.
> On Windows Vista 64 bit (using Firefox 32 bit though)
> I get the suggestion to download the Firebird 32 bit package.
This is the lesser evil. You know that 32-bit builds can work in bot
On Wed, 30 Nov 2011 11:44:57 +0400, Dmitry Yemanov
wrote:
> 30.11.2011 11:37, Dmitry Yemanov wrote:
>
>> So the reason is elsewhere.
>
> Found it. SF has an ability to set the default download for the every
> major platform (Win/Lin/Mac/etc). This option was left empty for the
> server binarie
Dmitry Yemanov [2011-11-30 08:44] :
> Please test it and suggest any corrections.
For Linux 2.5.1 tar.gz is a better default choice than rpm
--
All the data continuously generated in your IT infrastructure
contains a de
30.11.2011 11:37, Dmitry Yemanov wrote:
> So the reason is elsewhere.
Found it. SF has an ability to set the default download for the every
major platform (Win/Lin/Mac/etc). This option was left empty for the
server binaries but set for the .NET provider packages.
I have it fixed now for Windo
30.11.2011 11:30, Dmitry Yemanov wrote:
> AFAIK, this is how SF advertises the latest package published by the
> project.
Well, this guess looks wrong. The .NET provider has been updated in June
while we had a v2.5.1 release in October. So the reason is elsewhere.
Dmitry
-
On 11/30/11 11:16, Dmitry Kuzmenko wrote:
> Hello, All!
>
> I'm sorry writing this question here, bit I have not
> access to firebird-admins.
>
> Is it normal that SF alway suggesting to download
> .Net driver?
>
> For example, when I open
> https://sourceforge.net/projects/firebird/
>
> I see hug
30.11.2011 11:16, Dmitry Kuzmenko wrote:
>
> Is it normal that SF alway suggesting to download
> .Net driver?
>
> For example, when I open
> https://sourceforge.net/projects/firebird/
>
> I see huge green button recommending me to
> download .Net driver.
> Under this button is link
> Browse All Fil
10 matches
Mail list logo
