[Firebird-devel] eliminating pedantic warnings

2011-05-20 Thread marius adrian popa
If i compile firebird 3.x with clang++ i have a lot of warnings also you reproduce with g++ if you add -Wparentheses (maybe it should be added to the default g++ flags in devel flags on linux/posix) "using the result of an assignment as a condition without parentheses" https://gist.github.com/98265

Re: [Firebird-devel] eliminating pedantic warnings

2011-05-20 Thread Dmitry Yemanov
20.05.2011 13:57, marius adrian popa wrote: > If i compile firebird 3.x with clang++ i have a lot of warnings also > you reproduce with g++ if you add > -Wparentheses (maybe it should be added to the default g++ flags in > devel flags on linux/posix) > "using the result of an assignment as a condi

Re: [Firebird-devel] eliminating pedantic warnings

2011-05-20 Thread marius adrian popa
On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 1:14 PM, Dmitry Yemanov wrote: > 20.05.2011 13:57, marius adrian popa wrote: > >> If i compile firebird 3.x with clang++ i have a lot of warnings also >> you reproduce with g++ if you add >> -Wparentheses (maybe it should be added to the default g++ flags in >> devel flags

[Firebird-devel] [FB-Tracker] Created: (CORE-3487) sometimes fbtracemgr segfaults when ending with ctrl+c

2011-05-20 Thread Paulius Pazera (JIRA)
sometimes fbtracemgr segfaults when ending with ctrl+c -- Key: CORE-3487 URL: http://tracker.firebirdsql.org/browse/CORE-3487 Project: Firebird Core Issue Type: Bug Components: En

Re: [Firebird-devel] Is correct the use of RAM in classic server

2011-05-20 Thread Alex Peshkoff
On 05/19/11 22:22, Jesus Garcia wrote: > Hello, i don't know if it is a bug or is the correct behavior, and before > open a report in tracker i would like to confirm it. > > I have one database with 1031 Tables, 1441 SP and 3173 triggers. I'm trying > fb 2.1 and 2.5 classic server. Cache pages is

Re: [Firebird-devel] Is correct the use of RAM in classic server

2011-05-20 Thread Jesus Garcia
> > > > >If this does not grow after repeating that action in an unlimited manner > >- I do not see problems. > The problem is that FB 2.5.1 requiere 60% more RAM than fb 2.1.4 for the same database, same metadata and same process, and i think that 60% is so much. If it is normal, is a problem for

Re: [Firebird-devel] Is correct the use of RAM in classic server

2011-05-20 Thread Vlad Khorsun
> The problem is that FB 2.5.1 requiere 60% more RAM than fb 2.1.4 for the > same database, same metadata and same process, and i think that 60% is so > much. If it is normal, is a problem for me to use classic server and fb 2.5. Could you provide minimal reproducible test case ? Regards, Vl

Re: [Firebird-devel] Is correct the use of RAM in classic server

2011-05-20 Thread Jesus Garcia
2011/5/20 Vlad Khorsun > > The problem is that FB 2.5.1 requiere 60% more RAM than fb 2.1.4 for the > > same database, same metadata and same process, and i think that 60% is so > > much. If it is normal, is a problem for me to use classic server and fb > 2.5. > > Could you provide minimal re

Re: [Firebird-devel] Is correct the use of RAM in classic server

2011-05-20 Thread Vlad Khorsun
>> > The problem is that FB 2.5.1 requiere 60% more RAM than fb 2.1.4 for the >> > same database, same metadata and same process, and i think that 60% is so >> > much. If it is normal, is a problem for me to use classic server and fb >> 2.5. >> >> Could you provide minimal reproducible test cas

Re: [Firebird-devel] Is correct the use of RAM in classic server

2011-05-20 Thread Jesus Garcia
Ideally would be to upload it somewhere and send url to me (privately, > if necessary) > > Regards, > Vlad > > I have sent you the links to hv...@users.sourceforge.net, to decompress the password is hvlad Regards, Jesus Garcia ---