Re: [Firebird-devel] Conversion of CVS to Subversion

2012-07-16 Thread Mark Rotteveel
On Mon, 16 Jul 2012 01:01:31 +0200, Roman Rokytskyy wrote: > - should be integrated with Eclipse at least on the same level as CVS. The latest versions of Eclipse supports git and the Eclipse project itself has moved all their code to git, so I assume (without checking) that it provides a similar

Re: [Firebird-devel] Conversion of CVS to Subversion

2012-07-16 Thread Pavel Cisar
Hi, I did the conversion of main Firebird modules to SVN. Dne 14.7.2012 17:19, Mark Rotteveel napsal(a): > Now that Jaybird 2.2 is released we want to migrate the CVS client-java > module to Subversion. Is there any documentation on how this was done > for firebird? Nope. As it was one-way, do-o

Re: [Firebird-devel] Conversion of CVS to Subversion

2012-07-16 Thread Frank
On 16/07/12 10:05, Mark Rotteveel wrote: > On Mon, 16 Jul 2012 01:01:31 +0200, Roman Rokytskyy > wrote: >> - should be integrated with Eclipse at least on the same level as CVS. > > The latest versions of Eclipse supports git and the Eclipse project itself > has moved all their code to git, so I

Re: [Firebird-devel] Conversion of CVS to Subversion

2012-07-16 Thread Michal Kubecek
On Sun, Jul 15, 2012 at 12:30:23PM +0100, Lester Caine wrote: > Will Subversion actually add anything other than wasting time and > requiring people to rewrok their end of things. >From my point of view, there is one big drawback of CVS: it doesn't keep information about which changes to different

Re: [Firebird-devel] Trusted auth like on Linux/Mac

2012-07-16 Thread Alex Peshkoff
On 07/11/12 17:36, Dalton Calford wrote: > If possible, the linux servers should support pam authentication Probably will be done in FB3. That's just plugin writing question... > (default > linux security authentication) which means they can also support microsoft > active directory once the li

Re: [Firebird-devel] Trusted auth like on Linux/Mac

2012-07-16 Thread Alex Peshkoff
On 07/11/12 17:15, marius adrian popa wrote: > I wonder if the trusted auth should be enabled on linux too for > embedded mode for example It's not trusted auth, it's OS auth, and it works in embedded mode. > I didn't checked yet but the linux embedded library should use the > current user if you

[Firebird-devel] Name of service manager

2012-07-16 Thread Dimitry Sibiryakov
Hello, All. Currently service manager has fixed name service_mgr, but AFAICS in code, this name isn't used anywhere. Is it possible to ignore the name then? I have a problem: I got a connection string from user for creation of database. Say, I want to check server (engine) version

Re: [Firebird-devel] Name of service manager

2012-07-16 Thread Dmitry Yemanov
16.07.2012 16:06, Dimitry Sibiryakov wrote: > > If service manager name was ignored, > I could just feed the same connection string to isc_service_attach() The whole connection string? And what should the service do with the database pathname? Dmitry -

Re: [Firebird-devel] Name of service manager

2012-07-16 Thread Alex Peshkoff
On 07/16/12 16:27, Dmitry Yemanov wrote: > 16.07.2012 16:06, Dimitry Sibiryakov wrote: >> If service manager name was ignored, >> I could just feed the same connection string to isc_service_attach() > The whole connection string? And what should the service do with the > database pathname? Look

Re: [Firebird-devel] Name of service manager

2012-07-16 Thread Dmitry Yemanov
16.07.2012 17:05, Alex Peshkoff wrote: > Looks like Dimitry wants to make it ignore database pathname. If so, then this looks crappy, sorry. Dmitry -- Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover al

Re: [Firebird-devel] Name of service manager

2012-07-16 Thread Alex Peshkoff
On 07/16/12 16:06, Dimitry Sibiryakov wrote: >Hello, All. > >Currently service manager has fixed name service_mgr, but AFAICS in code, > this name > isn't used anywhere. >Is it possible to ignore the name then? > >I have a problem: I got a connection string from user for creation

Re: [Firebird-devel] Name of service manager

2012-07-16 Thread Dimitry Sibiryakov
16.07.2012 14:27, Dmitry Yemanov wrote: > And what should the service do with the > database pathname? Whatever it likes. From ignoring to checking ODS and decide whether to handle the connection or to let other service a chance. What current service manager does with "service_mgs" string?

Re: [Firebird-devel] Name of service manager

2012-07-16 Thread Dimitry Sibiryakov
16.07.2012 15:24, Alex Peshkoff wrote: > I understand what do you want. But before doing something with this let > me mention that there are some more service manager names that are > accepted by engine. Version1 services contain a part of utility's > command line internally - for example service n

[Firebird-devel] FB_API_VER

2012-07-16 Thread Treeve Jelbert
both fb2.5 and fb3.0 report #define FB_API_VER 25 but fb3,0 also defines SQL_BOOLEAN is this normal? -- Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat land

[Firebird-devel] [FB-Tracker] Created: (CORE-3891) New service information items to get parts of server version in binary form

2012-07-16 Thread Dimitry Sibiryakov (JIRA)
New service information items to get parts of server version in binary form --- Key: CORE-3891 URL: http://tracker.firebirdsql.org/browse/CORE-3891 Project: Firebird Core

[Firebird-devel] [FB-Tracker] Created: (CORE-3892) /var/lib/firebird/2.5/

2012-07-16 Thread Arx (JIRA)
/var/lib/firebird/2.5/ -- Key: CORE-3892 URL: http://tracker.firebirdsql.org/browse/CORE-3892 Project: Firebird Core Issue Type: Bug Affects Versions: 2.5.1 Environment: ubuntu 12.04 server, apt-get install

Re: [Firebird-devel] Name of service manager

2012-07-16 Thread Alex Peshkoff
On 07/16/12 18:18, Dimitry Sibiryakov wrote: > 16.07.2012 15:24, Alex Peshkoff wrote: >> I understand what do you want. But before doing something with this let >> me mention that there are some more service manager names that are >> accepted by engine. Version1 services contain a part of utility'