Den 2013-08-13 06:52 skrev Dmitry Yemanov såhär:
> All,
>
> There are some kinds of queries that have data access methods linked to
> each other. Windowed functions are the obvious example, but it happens
> even for regular aggregate functions. For example, COUNT(DISTINCT) needs
> not only read the
Dmitry Yemanov писал(а) в своём письме Tue, 13 Aug
2013 08:52:02 +0400:
>
> Select Expression
> 1: -> Aggregate
> 2:-> Table "RDB$RELATIONS" Access By ID
> 3: -> Index "RDB$INDEX_0" Scan
> 4:-> Sort (unique)
> 5: -> $(2)
>
> all methods are globally enumerated. The output is
13.08.2013 6:52, Dmitry Yemanov wrote:
> Comments anyone? Other suggestions?
Because plans are read from bottom to the top, I would prefer something like
this:
(A)
Select Expression
-> Aggregate
-> Sort (unique)
-> Table "RDB$RELATIONS" Access By ID
-> Index "RDB$INDE
13.08.2013 11:55, Dimitry Sibiryakov wrote:
>
> Because plans are read from bottom to the top, I would prefer something like
> this:
>
> (A)
>
> Select Expression
> -> Aggregate
>-> Sort (unique)
>-> Table "RDB$RELATIONS" Access By ID
> -> Index "RDB$INDEX_0" Scan
No
13.08.2013 11:28, Kjell Rilbe wrote:
>
> I fear that I know too little about the inner workings, but I'm a bit
> surprised... I would have thought that this is what actually happens:
>
> Select Expression
> -> Aggregate
>-> Sort (unique)
> -> Table "RDB$RELATIONS" Access By ID
13.08.2013 10:07, Dmitry Yemanov wrote:
> Select Expression
> -> Aggregate
> -> Sort (unique)
> -> Sort (unique)
> -> Table "RDB$RELATIONS" Access By ID
> -> Index "RDB$INDEX_0" Scan
> Is it understandable that sorts are independent from each other but both
Unable to read MON$-tables when run few ISQLs that all make bulk updates of
huge table (10E8 rows for each of them)
---
Key: CORE-4179
URL: http://trac
Den 2013-08-13 10:23 skrev Dimitry Sibiryakov såhär:
> 13.08.2013 10:07, Dmitry Yemanov wrote:
>
>> Select Expression
>>-> Aggregate
>> -> Sort (unique)
>> -> Sort (unique)
>> -> Table "RDB$RELATIONS" Access By ID
>>-> Index "RDB$INDEX_0" Scan
>> Is it
Wrong results after creating collation or win1251 from unicode case
insensitive: strings are considered as distinct while they don't
Key: CORE-4180
isql should be able to use the new API
--
Key: CORE-4181
URL: http://tracker.firebirdsql.org/browse/CORE-4181
Project: Firebird Core
Issue Type: Improvement
Components: ISQL
Affects Versions:
10 matches
Mail list logo