(name-value pairs) to users (which are stored in
the security database
and can be managed in some way)
In-Reply-To:
<1530443172.32511386349983825.javamail.tom...@tracker.firebirdsql.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-JIRA-FingerPrint:
On 12/08/13 17:57, Mark Rotteveel wrote:
> What is the meaning of the blob_id in the response to op_open_blob(2)?
Number of that object at the server site.
> It is not the same as the original blob_id.
Definitely not.
> Is it something that can
> (should?) be ignored?
If we want to work with t
Welcome,
Le 04/12/2013 04:24, W O a écrit :
> Which are the requeriments and steps to follow? (if such thing is possible,
> of course).
We have more or less std procedure - one who wants to take part in FB
development sends some patches to us. If we like them we commit them and
give that person co
On 12/09/13 12:55, Philippe Makowski wrote:
> Welcome,
>
> Le 04/12/2013 04:24, W O a écrit :
>> Which are the requeriments and steps to follow? (if such thing is possible,
>> of course).
> We have more or less std procedure - one who wants to take part in FB
> development sends some patches to us.
On Mon, 09 Dec 2013 12:50:50 +0400, Alex Peshkoff
wrote:
> On 12/08/13 17:57, Mark Rotteveel wrote:
>> What is the meaning of the blob_id in the response to op_open_blob(2)?
>
> Number of that object at the server site.
That is the object handle, which is a different entity from the blob id in
t
On 12/09/13 13:57, Mark Rotteveel wrote:
> On Mon, 09 Dec 2013 12:50:50 +0400, Alex Peshkoff
> wrote:
>> On 12/08/13 17:57, Mark Rotteveel wrote:
>>> What is the meaning of the blob_id in the response to op_open_blob(2)?
>> Number of that object at the server site.
> That is the object handle, whi
On Mon, 09 Dec 2013 14:12:44 +0400, Alex Peshkoff
wrote:
> On 12/09/13 13:57, Mark Rotteveel wrote:
>> On Mon, 09 Dec 2013 12:50:50 +0400, Alex Peshkoff
>> wrote:
>>> On 12/08/13 17:57, Mark Rotteveel wrote:
What is the meaning of the blob_id in the response to
op_open_blob(2)?
>>> Number of
On 12/09/13 14:22, Mark Rotteveel wrote:
>> Code of network operation? Something else? Upon this depends an answer.
> I think it is safe to assume that I will almost always be talking from the
> perspective of the wire protocol.
>
> Both op_create_blob and op_open_blob respond with a p_resp, which
On Mon, 09 Dec 2013 14:35:33 +0400, Alex Peshkoff
wrote:
> On 12/09/13 14:22, Mark Rotteveel wrote:
>
>>> Code of network operation? Something else? Upon this depends an
answer.
>> I think it is safe to assume that I will almost always be talking from
>> the
>> perspective of the wire protocol.
>
On 12/09/13 14:45, Mark Rotteveel wrote:
>> Yes. For open_blob only p_resp_object is returned.
> I thought I saw it also returns something in p_resp_data (currently
> ignored by Jaybird), but I was too busy to look deeper into that. Any idea
> what it could be, maybe info on the opened blob, which
Thank you Philippe, but I still don't have the self confidence of send some
patch, for now just reading and trying to understand the source code and
the logic used.
Greetings.
Walter.
On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 4:55 AM, Philippe Makowski wrote:
> Welcome,
>
> Le 04/12/2013 04:24, W O a écrit :
>
Hello Alex
Yes, I have some ideas but I don't know if are they good or not, I think
that I need to dive deep into the source code before discuss them.
Greetings.
Walter.
On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 5:09 AM, Alex Peshkoff wrote:
> On 12/09/13 12:55, Philippe Makowski wrote:
> > Welcome,
> >
> > L
On 09/12/2013 11:07, W O wrote:
> Thank you Philippe, but I still don't have the self confidence of send
> some patch, for now just reading and trying to understand the source
> code and the logic used.
>
>
If you don't, start following the firebird-checkins mailing list.
There you see the evoluti
Thank you very much Adriano.
Greetings.
Walter.
On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 9:13 AM, Adriano dos Santos Fernandes <
adrian...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 09/12/2013 11:07, W O wrote:
> > Thank you Philippe, but I still don't have the self confidence of send
> > some patch, for now just reading and tryi
Hello,
On multiple machines 2k3 32 64 2k8, 2k12 64, no way to configure
FB3.0.0.30776
335544421 error systematically whatever settings.
Initialization via GSEC ok
a better idea or a config that works? :-)
Norbert
--
..
TetraSys
http://www.tetrasys.eu
--
On 9-12-2013 20:17, Norbert wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On multiple machines 2k3 32 64 2k8, 2k12 64, no way to configure
> FB3.0.0.30776
> 335544421 error systematically whatever settings.
> Initialization via GSEC ok
>
> a better idea or a config that works? :-)
Error 335544421 is "connection rejected by
On 9-12-2013 12:11, Alex Peshkoff wrote:
> On 12/09/13 14:45, Mark Rotteveel wrote:
>
>>> Yes. For open_blob only p_resp_object is returned.
>> I thought I saw it also returns something in p_resp_data (currently
>> ignored by Jaybird), but I was too busy to look deeper into that. Any idea
>> what i
> Error 335544421 is "connection rejected by remote interface". How are
> you connecting to Firebird: fbclient.dll (if so 3.0 version or a 2.5 or
> earlier?), or Jaybird, .NET provider or another driver?
>
> Is anything in the firebird.log? Did you change anything in
> firebird.conf, or did you
On 9-12-2013 21:49, Norbert wrote:
>> Error 335544421 is "connection rejected by remote interface". How are
>> you connecting to Firebird: fbclient.dll (if so 3.0 version or a 2.5 or
>> earlier?), or Jaybird, .NET provider or another driver?
>>
>> Is anything in the firebird.log? Did you change any
Mark Rotteveel a formulé ce lundi :
> On 9-12-2013 21:49, Norbert wrote:
>>> Error 335544421 is "connection rejected by remote interface". How are
>>> you connecting to Firebird: fbclient.dll (if so 3.0 version or a 2.5 or
>>> earlier?), or Jaybird, .NET provider or another driver?
>>>
>>> Is anyt
20 matches
Mail list logo
