Re: [Firebird-devel] [FB3.0.0.30805]: incorrect(?) blr_type for [SEC$USERS].[SEC$ACTIVE]

2014-01-01 Thread Alex
On 12/31/2013 03:00 PM, Mark Rotteveel wrote: > On 31-12-2013 09:15, Alex wrote: >> On 12/29/2013 01:53 PM, Dmitry Kovalenko wrote: >>> Hi >>> >>> Why domain for [SEC$USERS].[SEC$ACTIVE] uses field_type with id: 71 ? >>> >>> But not 23 (blr_bool)? >>> >> Cause we already have blr_boolean, and when

Re: [Firebird-devel] [FB3.0.0.30805]: incorrect(?) blr_type for[SEC$USERS].[SEC$ACTIVE]

2014-01-01 Thread Kjell Rilbe
Den 2014-01-01 09:00 skrev Alex såhär: > On 12/31/2013 03:00 PM, Mark Rotteveel wrote: >> Out of curiosity: what is the difference between blr_boolean and blr_bool? > blr_boolean is a node in execution tree, containing boolean expression > blr_bool is datatype > > Though both are called BLR, they d